THE GUILTY MIND SYNDROME (GMS)

 Yes, ‘Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder’ ".

For years I have heard conservatives call liberalism a mental disease and have generally viewed this as hyperbole. Recently, however, it has occurred to me that people like Michael Savage, the talk show host, are right. For if the essence of liberalism is self-hatred – hatred of one’s race, of one’s sex, of one’s ‘sexual orientation’, of one’s religion, of one’s ethnicity, of one’s nation(ality), indeed, even of one’s species (vis a vis ‘animal rights’) – and if the essence of such self-hatred is taking the enemy’s side and being against one’s own interests – then what better measure of mental illness could there be than acting in furtherance of one’s own destruction? Think about it. If suicidal impulses makes an individual ‘sick’, then surely it makes a society, a people and a race just as sick – and just as certainly, doomed.

Feminism and the Homosexual Lobby: Truly A Sickness Unto Death

Notice how this self-destructive self-hatred, which lies at the heart of liberalism, fits seamlessly with feminism and the promotion of homosexuality. While feminism is inherently destructive because it leads to negative population growth, it has become increasingly – and openly – anti-family, anti-marriage and anti-child-bearing. When a friend, teaching at a junior college in Los Angeles, played a video about the dangers of women not having children, his female students were outraged. They were going to have good jobs – and that was that!! Reasoning with them, he assured me, was out of the question. This is bedrock feminism.

Moreover, it is clear that this assault on marriage and child-rearing is part and parcel of the agenda to legitimize homosexuality – and, preposterous as it might seem, to de-legitimize heterosexuality. Precisely because they are so aware of the abhorrent nature of their own behaviour sodomists will savagely insist on precisely the opposite; hence, e.g., the campaign to institutionalize homosexual marriage.

Thus, two of the dominant ‘liberation’ movements of our time – feminism (with its pro-abortion zealotry) and the promotion of homosexuality – have identical goals and consequences: a suicidally reduced birth rate. Add to this their penchant for taking the side of an enemy sworn to their destruction (...).and what you have, are people whose goal seems to be the destruction of their own society: discouraging marriage and child-rearing is anti-life, as of course is abortion, as is the active encouragement of homosexuality.

Ergo, to the extent these ideas become dominant, they point in only one direction: death. A people who refuse to reproduce obviously has no future. Whites may bury their heads in the sand, but hispanic groups like La Raza, advocating the reconquista of the American southwest, know better.

"Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die. Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” [My emphasis.] Truly, a sickness unto death.

Explaining The Rise of the Homosexual Movement

It may seem that the rapid acceptance of homosexuality (since the 1960s) was somehow inevitable. Nevertheless, specific circumstances are relevant. The New York Times has an enormous influence on public opinion in America, far out of proportion to its circulation (in November 2008 only about one million). This is apparently due to the fact that what appears on the Times’ front page largely determines the lead stories on network TV news – which, for the vast majority of Americans, is their only source of news. And who determines what is on that front page? Frequently, says Richard Berke, the Times’ National Political Correspondent and himself a homosexual, ‘literally three-quarters of the people deciding what’s on the front page are not-so-closeted homosexuals’.

It is disturbing, to say the least, that such a relative handful of people, completely hidden from public view, could have such a profoundly insidious impact on the very survival of the Western world. And make no mistake about it, homosexual advocacy groups are often genuinely evil. ...

THE GUILTY MIND SYNDROME (GMS)

Over the past several years an idea has been gestating in the back of my mind, which I have dubbed The Guilty Mind Syndrome (GMS).

Examples (1) In the early 1980s I heard an item on the BBC about a high-ranking Soviet defector who had said that many of the top Communist leaders lived in constant dread of an nuclear attack from America, almost, he said, as if they were looking over their shoulders expecting it at any moment.

(2) In 1973 homosexual activists stormed a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) ‘demanding’ that homosexuality be removed from their compendium of illnesses. Though successful in their intimidation, a small group resisted and formed a subgroup within the APA offering their services to anyone wishing to become straight, claiming a small but significant success rate. The ‘activists’ were incensed by this, insisting that such therapy, though strictly voluntary, must be prohibited and the group disbanded.

3) In The Mail & Guardian, a leftwing weekly in South Africa, there are these paragraphs about Thabo Mbeki, President of South Africa (“Mbeki in bizarre Aids outburst”, by Drew Forrest and Barry Streek, week of 26 Oct – 1 November 2001, p.4; all emphases added):

… after referring to medical schools where black people were “reminded of their role as germ carriers”, [Mbeki] says: “Thus does it happen that others who consider themselves to be our leaders take to the streets carrying their placards, to demand that because we are germ carriers, and human beings of a lower order that cannot subject its passions to reason, we must perforce adopt strange opinions, to save a depraved and diseased people from perishing from self-inflicted disease”.
… “Convinced that we are but natural-born, promiscuous carriers of germs, unique in the world, they proclaim that our continent is doomed to an inevitable moral end because of our unconquerable devotion to the sin of lust”.

(4) In late 1999, during a visit to the US, my recently divorced brother had acquired a much younger girlfriend whom his teenage son Clark despised. Approaching the living room, through which he had to pass to exit, my brother says in a conspiratorial whisper, “Is Clark there?”. No, I said, but why are you whispering? Oh, he said, he was carrying a bag with some shoes for his girlfriend. And so? “I don’t want him to see!” Satisfied that the room was ‘clear’, he left.

(5) In Johannesburg, a lesbian couple were convicted of murdering a four year old child. The headline says it all: “SLAIN because he refused to call his mother’s lesbian lover ‘Daddy’” (The Star, 23 March 2006, p.1). (For a frighteningly similar example from the U.S., involving black lesbians, see here.)

Examples Analyzed

(i) Let us assume that Soviet leaders did in fact expect to be attacked by America. The question is, How can one explain this, given that it was totally at odds with reality?

The defector had said that most of these leaders were guilty of terrible crimes, and let us assume that that is also true. I would claim that, with few exceptions, people who do wicked and evil things know that they are wicked and evil – and that they deserve to be punished.

These beliefs – that they were evil and deserved to be punished – were basically true. But they also believed things which were flagrantly false, specifically, that American leaders knew, as the Soviet leaders did, that these Soviets were criminals who deserved to be punished. In fact, nothing could have been further from the truth. 

The Glaring Light Phenomenon (GLP)

So why did the Soviet leaders believe these things? First – and what is typical of someone who’s aware that he’s doing wrong – he assumes that his behaviour and its wrongness are glaringly apparent to everyone and anyone, like a flashing neon light, even when this is not remotely the case (The Glaring Light Phenomenon [GLP]). And secondly, they believed that American leaders not only knew this but would act upon it.

Note, therefore, that what these communists were assuming with regards to what the Americans believed – that they (the Soviet leaders) were evil and deserved to be punished – is nothing more nor less than what these Soviets themselves believed, viz., that they deserved to be and would be punished. And what could be less surprising and more natural than that they should think that others would believe about them precisely what they believed about themselves?

Hence, we get exactly what the defector said: the Soviet leadership living in dread of a nuclear attack from America. GMS.

(ii) Why did homosexual activists demand that psychiatrists offering to help homosexuals wishing to become straight be stopped? First, I would assert that they feel shame and revulsion about their lifestyle and assume that everyone else feels the same way. Anything, therefore, which could even remotely be interpreted as casting aspersions on their behaviour will immediately be seen as a neon light broadcasting their disgusting behaviour for all to see (GLP). ‘What could these psychiatrists be saying other than that our lifestyle is filthy and disgusting?’ (After all, that’s what we think!) And that will not be tolerated! Once again, they are merely assuming that others feel towards them precisely what they feel towards themselves. GMS.

iii) Thabo Mbeki’s accusations against whites are remarkable on several counts. First, the idea of whites ‘carrying placards’ with such allegations is not only false but absurdly so.

Even in America, where whites are still a large majority, this is unimaginable; how much more so in South Africa where they are a small minority recently stripped of political power?

How does one explain Mkebi making such a charge? Well, virtually everything Mbeki accuses whites of saying about blacks is true – and uncannily accurate: they are promiscuous; black men do have higher levels of testosterone and hence are more ‘lustful’; they are more impulsive and have less self-control; and they are ‘disease-carriers’ – besides AIDS and TB, the rate of other sexually transmitted diseases amongst blacks is astronomical; and whether or not Africa is ‘doomed’, it is clear that Mbeki, for one, thinks it is.

But why does he make these ‘bizarre’ charges? Well, once again, he is assuming, first, that blacks’ numerous moral malfeasances are glaringly obvious to everyone (GLP) and hence he is merely assuming that others believe about his group what he himself believes. And so he expects them to say such things because that’s what he thinks they ought to say. In other words, the GMS.

(iv) Though really doing nothing wrong, my brother nevertheless felt like a child-with-his-hand-in-the-cookie-jar. He therefore assumed that everyone somehow ‘knew’ what he was doing (GLP), and that his son Clark, like his namesake Clark Kent, would use his x-ray vision to see through the bag and know immediately who these shoes were for and would (of course!) ‘challenge’ him. Hence, his need to ‘sneak out’. Once again, a clear case of the GMS.

(v) When I saw the photographs of the lesbian couple I thought it was a mistake, because one of them was clearly a man. But no, this was the ‘male’ partner and, as I guessed, the one who beat the child to death.

Inner Turmoil

Why would the child’s refusing to call her ‘daddy’ provoke her so? First of all, and like most homosexuals, she feels (genuine and warranted) self-loathing. Combine this with the unrelenting drumbeat promoting homosexuality as healthy, normal, even desirable, and you get an inner turmoil resulting from the clash between the fantasies she hears and the reality she knows. And once again, she assumes that others regard her with the same disgust with which she regards herself; consequently she expects to be treated with the contempt which she feels towards herself, and, which she thinks she deserves.

Thus, extraordinary as it might seem, when this four year old boy refused to call her ‘daddy’ – which would have been an affirmation of her normality – she can only ‘see’ this as an accusation of what she herself believes and expects to hear: that she is abnormal and disgusting. And so she lashes out. GMS.

How ‘’Liberation’ Has Made Things Worse for Homosexuals

I believe it is precisely this inner turmoil which causes the numerous pathologies so common amongst (male) homosexuals – promiscuity, drug abuse, pedophilia, et. al. – all of which are attempts to reaffirm their sexuality, something which is only necessary because of the self-loathing intrinsic to their lifestyle.

I would further conjecture that this self-loathing has been greatly exacerbated by homosexual ‘liberation’, as a result of which they are constantly having to confront the reality of their behaviour vs. the ‘normality’ they are supposed to believe in, making it much more difficult to ‘ignore’ this reality than before, when the ethos was pretty much: ‘you keep to yourselves and we’ll keep to ourselves’. They were, indeed, living ‘in the shadows’; but that, after all, is pretty much where this behaviour should be. Not in jail, certainly; but not ‘parading’ down main street either.
This murder underscores the very real consequences of Sickness-Unto-Death

Political Correctness: this little boy had a father who wanted to take care of him; instead, he was – of course! – given to this ‘perfectly healthy and normal’ lesbian couple!

Gedaliah Braun
From: Racism Guilt Self-Hatred and Self-Deceid

How can you be against clean air, public transportation, affordable housing, and protecting the beauty of the natural environment?

 ‘The idea was OK,’ she said, ‘it was the execution that was disastrous.’ This is a signature of UN Agenda 21. How can you be against clean air, public transportation, affordable housing, and protecting the beauty of the natural environment? The idea is OK but the execution--BY DESIGN--is disastrous. That is the point. The idea is the candy coating, the execution IS the desired outcome. As Joseph Conrad wrote in The Heart of Darkness: The horror.

You must know by now that every crisis we’ve seen (Stock Market, Housing Crash, Energy Cost Spike) has been engineered in accordance with UN Agenda 21. Gretchen Morgenson puts the blame on ‘greed’ but it’s much more than that. Greed was used as the leverage for drawing these high level thieves into position to allow the markets to crash. As long as banks were guaranteed bailouts, individual CEOs were made wealthy, and regulators looked the other way, UN Agenda 21 could be implemented. Another way to look at this is to say that everything that did happen was meant to happen by your government. Inflated bubbles that were enabled and created by lack of government oversight point to your government as the source. What are the consequences? None. Huge bailouts, no jail time, no confiscated personal assets.

This was the sinking of our country, the devaluation of our land, the crash of our economy, and the systemic vulnerability that we recognize as the antidote to the “unsustainable affluence of Americans.” Now we are ripe for Smart Growth (stacked apartments along transit corridors), public transportation (loss of individual mobility due to high costs), domestic spying (Community Oriented Policing programs), deep unemployment (willingness to do whatever it takes to feed ourselves), and loss of our basic freedoms.

Because in Communitarianism, the ‘problem’ is created, the ‘solution’ is the outcome that you never would have agreed to without the urgency of the problem. So the ‘problem’ is: not enough low income home ownership. The ‘solution’ is: trick a lot of people who don’t qualify for loans into escalating debt situations and bankrupt them. I got three real estate loans myself during the 2003-2005 period and my mortgage broker really pressured me to take adjustable rate loans. I asked him if they came with a handbook on bankruptcy and I took the fixed rate. But that was because I have some experience—even he has now lost his home to foreclosure.

The real result of the dialectic? The housing crisis (shift of private property ownership) and financial system collapse. Except the financial system didn’t collapse, did it? No. It got bailed out and the smaller players got absorbed into their larger rivals. Consolidation of wealth and power. And you’re paying for it with double digit unemployment and total market uncertainty for the long term. The poor became destitute, the middle class is evaporating, and the rich are partying on the moon. Wonder where the money went? Take a look at some of the fabulous buildings that have been constructed in Dubai. The famous rotating skyscraper is a good one. I hear that George Bush has an apartment there. Seriously. Private property ownership will be reserved for the super-rich only.

Now our cities have far-flung suburbs with many empty buildings that are not contributing to the tax base. Remember that one of the goals of UN Agenda 21 is to ‘reduce sprawl?’ Here’s something you may not have heard of yet: A proposed one trillion dollar federal program to enable local governments to purchase vacant residential, commercial, and industrial properties from banks and demolish them. Why?

So that more green space can be created in cities. They call this turning redfields (vacant bank-owned properties in the ‘red’) to greenfields (parks and open space).

In this fantasy world of more and more federal money created out of thin air, underperforming property held in private ownership will be converted to publicly-held open space. Your city, which now can’t keep your existing parks watered and maintained, will acquire bank-owned land. In this sort of perfect UN Agenda 21 spin, all of the people in Smart Growth buildings downtown need a place to play. It has to be a public place because government can’t observe you when you’re in your backyard. In another ‘rescue’ of banks and as a part of UN Agenda 21’s war on private property, existing buildings will be demolished and private land taken off of the property tax rolls. Demolition of buildings (how’s that for a greenhouse gas/carbon generating/landfill glutting solution) and building parks will ‘create jobs’ in this scenario.

Let’s say it again: ONE TRILLION DOLLARS of federal money is proposed for this ‘land-based approach to solving America’s economic crisis.’ That quote is from the Urban Land Institute’s January/February 2010 article From Vacant Properties to Green Space. It covers the ‘story’ that City Parks Alliance, of Washington, DC is developing a federal funding strategy for this scheme.

Can we put this together?

Step by step: UN Agenda 21 sets the stage for high density development in cities.

Redevelopment agencies subsidize development for Smart Growth. Only some favored builders are in on the money train.

Banks were urged in the Clinton administration to loosen their loan criteria and let the money flow.

Developers built more and more commercial and residential buildings, glutting the market.

The economic collapse was engineered to cover the migration of business and production out of the US.

The stock market crash was engineered to suck wealth out of the middle class and destabilize their retirement.

The TARP bail-out was pay-back for the banks and consolidated their power by allowing them to take over smaller banks.

The crashed economy is a staged event and encourages agitation for more social programs, along with the vilification of property ownership. Those who own private property are ‘greedy.’

As people lose their homes to foreclosure and their steady employment vanishes, they will be more willing to live in government subsidized apartments in the center of cities. Neighborhood cohesiveness will be a thing of the past. There will be less people to object to loss of private property rights. Proposals to stop the federal mortgage interest tax deduction will be more easily accepted, thus threatening private home ownership. The press obligingly writes articles about the miseries of home ownership and extols the virtues of living in a condo (maintenance-free!) or apartment (move when you want!) next to the train tracks.

Instead of ‘social equity’ we’re seeing a transfer of wealth from the middle class to the rich, as foreclosed property gets snapped up at deep discounts by those with cash.

High unemployment and government assistance contributes to overall government indebtedness and continues the spiral of reducing our standard of living.

Private car ownership will become unaffordable through high gasoline prices, high parking costs in city centers, and vehicle miles traveled taxes, and wages can be lowered to reflect the ‘savings.’

The redfields to greenfields conversions in the suburbs allow cities to demolish buildings and close off services to those areas. Redevelopment dollars, your property tax dollars, will be used for these projects.

Rural roads will not be paved, making rural property less valuable, banks will foreclose and local government will buy for pennies on the dollar. Less and less land will be available for agriculture, for production, for small scale living. Government-owned land will be managed by or given to non-profit land trusts in public private partnerships.

Lands will be closed off to public use. Rural areas closed. Suburban areas closed. Forest areas closed. Rural roads closed. Logging roads closed. Camping areas closed. State park areas closed.

Restrictions on travel. Personal identification required at all times. Health records. School records. Communication records. Email, Facebook, Global positioning mapping, Virtual Reality---all serve to narrow your world.

Community oriented policing, Fusion Centers, expanded domestic surveillance powers for the FBI, redefining torture, continuous war for peace, eternal war on terror, regular renewal of the USA Patriot Act.

Picking winners and losers is the official blood sport of the Agenda for the 21st century.

Regionalization of government will take the planning decisions away from local government and out of your control; the little you still have. Rural councils, regional boards, neighborhood associations, condominium boards, residents’ associations---all speak for you without your ability to stop them. They all want the same thing. Control, total information, and social engineering. Think you’ll be able to stop Smart Meters when you live in a 200 unit building owned by your local low income (government subsidized) housing developer?

More information is being indexed and categorized and retained about you than ever before in the history of the world. It is being used to sell, manage, monitor, control, and restrict you. Your government, through your elected officials, unelected boards and commissions, local neighborhood associations and groups is balancing your individual rights with the ‘rights of the community’, and you are losing. Keeping you quiet, sedated, passive, compliant, consuming, exhausted, distracted, frightened, ignorant, and confused is the order of the day. The New World Globalist Order.

The Neo-Feudalism of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is reviving serfdom as the condition of the future. If you let it.

From the book

BEHIND THE GREEN MASK:

 U.N. Agenda 21

ROSA KOIRE

Modern taboo

 Distilling this book’s message to a succinct, perhaps provocative statement would produce something like this:

Today’s Germany is a dictatorship where some ten to twenty thousand criminal investigations are launched every year for mere expressions of opinions, and where hundreds of political prisoners are locked up for the sole reason of having expressed in a peaceful way their peaceful views which those in power don’t like.

Of course that’s nonsense, the average person will say, because everyone knows that Germany grants civil rights to its citizens and has a well-maintained legal system that is highly regarded. 

I have written the present book exactly in order to burst that delusory bubble with a heavy load of evidence.

In order to understand the discrepancy between self-image and reality of today’s German society, one has to deal with Germany’s taboos which prevent Germans from perceiving that which our wishful thinking does not want to be true. In order to deal with a taboo, one has first to violate it. 

Hence, please permit me to violate right in this introduction Germany’s most-strictly enforced taboo, which is at once also the strongest taboo of all the other societies of the cultural western hemisphere. By doing this, we put ourselves in a position where we can then analyze the effects of that taboo.

What is a taboo? Read the motto again that I’ve put at the very top of the first page of this introduction. A truly effective taboo prohibits that one dare call it a taboo in the first place, because taboos are something archaic, something that an enlightened, tolerant society shouldn’t have. Hence, to call a taboo just that amounts to an indictment of that very regime that enforces it, accusing it of being primitive, unenlightened, oppressive. In the end, calling a taboo by its name amounts already to violating it, an act which the regime imposing this taboo will punish. 

So, what exactly is this taboo of western societies in general and Germany in particular? As an enlightened citizen, about which topic don’t you dare talk publicly in a manner not conforming with the expectations of your society? There may be some topics that come to your mind. But I’m not talking about just any topic.

Well, it is actually quite easy to find the answer to this question, and by this I don’t even mean reading the present book, which deals almost exclusively with that taboo and the impact its violation had for me. Actually, the answer is in plain sight for all who are willing to see it. Just ask yourself what events in your society have turned once-prominent personalities into social lepers overnight, making them lose jobs and positions and in some countries getting them even prosecuted and jailed?

One instance of Germany’s taboo was that of the German member of parliament Martin Hohmann, who in 2003 mused during a presentation whether Jews were not merely victims but also perpetrators at some points in modern European history.1 And there’s the snag: The topic JEW and all that is connected to it is the taboo.

Already when writing this sentence, when violating this taboo, my hackles still get up, even after years of dealing with this taboo, and I am sure the average reader will feel mightily uncomfortable when reading these lines. Had I used any other word than JEW, nobody would mind.

Have you ever asked yourself what kind of subliminal conditioning you were subjected to in order to develop such strong emotions which are aroused, just because I have written this unspeakable word?

Or do you think this is no taboo at all? Well, on December 1, 2016, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a bill in a related matter. Even though that bill lapsed in the House due to the end of the session – it probably will be reintroduced in 2017 in some form – this bill still reveals the sentiments of evidently all leading politicians of the U.S. The intention behind that bill was to amend the flawed Civil Rights Act of 1964. That act merely prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin, but not of religion. The above bill wanted to change that.

Unfortunately, however, it did not do this for all religions, but only for Jews, as it merely aimed at banning discrimination by anti-Semitism.2 The way anti-Semitism was defined in it is revealing. In the “Fact Sheet” on this, it says, for instance, and I quote only some of what I find troubling:3

“– Making […] stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective—especially but not exclusively, the myth about […] Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. […]
– Accusing […] Israel as a state, of […] exaggerating the Holocaust.
– Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel […] than to the interest of their own nations. […]
– Using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism to characterize Israel or Israelis – Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Na-zis […]
– Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, and denying Israel the right to exist.” Of course, everyone should be against judging by stereotype, and for most people, all the other statements sound nice, too, but here are some tough questions:

– Who defines what is an unjustified stereotype and what is actually true?

– How can we inquire whether the State of Israel has contributed to exaggerating claims of the Holocaust, if the (negative) answer has been pre-scribed by law?

– If Jews are members of a people rather than a religion, as the last sentence of the above quote clearly suggests, then they inevitably must have a conflict of interest when living amongst the people of other nations. If so, then why is questioning their primary loyalty outlawed?

– And why is the use of the symbols and images in cartoons associated with classic anti-Islamism to characterize Muslims or Muslim countries, or classic anti-Germanism to characterize Germans or Germany fine (you can add many more examples here), but banned when the shoe is on a Chosen foot?

– Moreover, comparing something does not mean equating it. Historical comparisons can be a very powerful revelatory tool, so why ban them?

– Finally, Israel is not any other country. It came into existence by brutal-ly denying the original inhabitants of its land their right to self-determi-nation, and by ethnically cleansing many of them from that land. That policy of denial and ethnic cleansing has been maintained ever since Is-rael was incepted. So, either you deny the Palestinians their right to self-determination, and deny their country the right to exist, or you do this for the Jews and Israel. Either way, unless an all-encompassing so-lution can be found where both Jews and non-Jews can live with equal rights peacefully side by side, you are a denier one way or the other.

But only one form of denial is outlawed. Again: why?

– Who has the power over the minds of the members of Congress, and in extension to all who applaud this act, to make them so blind to this unwarranted “special treatment” of Jews and Israel?

– Once this act will have become the law of the land, how is one to criticize Jews and Israel, if any such criticism can be construed as unlawful discriminatory anti-Semitism?

If you want to know who rules a country, find out whom you are not allowed to criticize. Under a law like this, of course, that statement alone would already be called discriminatory anti-Semitism, because it is a “stereotypical allegations about […] the power of Jews as a collective.”

Welcome to the New World Order!
(Swap the N with a J, if you want to get in trouble) 

Having said all this, would you dare talk publicly in a critical way about the political influence that Jews have in the U.S., in Germany and many other countries, and why you dislike it – if you dislike it? The topic is a taboo, for it leads to certain social death for everyone touching this “third rail.” If you violate that taboo anyway, you might find yourself in trouble faster than you think, or even get prosecuted and jailed in many western countries. It’s as simple as that.

Well, the United States of America and its offspring the Federal Republic of Germany guarantee basic civil rights, right?

Of course, there is a reasoning behind all that, I know. After all that has happened, Jews may not be attacked, be it physically or verbally. But you may of course criticize the influence of any other group, correct? So, for a change, it’s not Jews that are being persecuted by the State, but “only” those who criticize Jews. Serves them right… And it immunizes Jews from any effective criticism. Serves them well, I’m sure.

But don’t worry; I will not elaborate any further on this topic in the present book. It is present merely between the lines, for this book deals with an issue which is one of the most important reasons why the topic JEW has become such a strong taboo to begin with: The dogma that Jews are the victims per se; that they are the personification of good; that anyone attack-ing or criticizing them must automatically be evil. What is this dogma?

To understand this, let’s delve deeper into this taboo, into a deeper, more “wicked” layer of the “Jew taboo.” What we are dealing with here may be explained by way of an exemplary victim of this taboo. It concerns a former official of the former German protest party Die Piraten (The Pirates), Bodo Thiesen. In May 2008 he wrote the following momentous sentences in an email to the party’s mailing list:4

“Well, until a few months ago, I believed as well that those ‘denying Auschwitz’ are mere adolescent cranks. Back then, however, I had not yet read Germar Rudolf. Sorry, but the book leaves a mark – at least if one approaches it objectively.”

That was the end of Thiesen’s political career. During the aftershocks of this “scandal”, which was rehashed by the German media in early 2012, the Pirate Party adopted a resolution during its membership convention with 1499 Yeas and only one abstention which reads as follows:5

“The Holocaust is an undeniable part of history. It is against the party’s principles to deny or relativize it under the cover of freedom of expression.”

If the members of any other German party left of the radical right had been asked to vote on a similar resolution, the results would have been the same, and that’s probably true for almost all political parties in all western coun-tries, some radical right parties on the fringe excepted. This is so in spite of the fact that many of these western countries have no legal enforcement of such policies. Such almost universal compliance with this taboo is nowa-days achieved with much more refined methods than Hitler or any other dictator in history could ever have dreamed of: by way of 70+ years of brainwashing an entire cultural hemisphere.

How else could it be explained that almost everyone is outraged as soon as someone merely hints at disregarding this übertaboo, the HOLO-CAUST? Anyone can express any kind of controversial opinion about any other subject of history without causing excessive reactions.
The Holocaust is that event by which the Jews became the victims par excellence. As the victims of evil incarnate, of the ultimate evil, they were themselves promoted to the epitome of the morally Good. Hence, the Jew taboo is a derivative taboo of the Holocaust taboo.

To this you may respond that the Holocaust is no taboo at all, because there is no other historical topic which is as omnipresent as this one. Even though it is true that no other historical event gains more attention than this one, that does not prove it’s not a taboo. Jews as such aren’t a taboo either, merely criticizing them in a manner that is considered unfair or anti-Semi-tic, which seems synonymous. The same is true for the Holocaust. While it is still possible to criticize Jews to some degree without getting in deep trouble, try even mildly criticizing the orthodox Holocaust narrative. You can doubt whether all is always kosher with the Jews or at least certain Jews, but try the same with the Holocaust or merely certain aspects of it:

Get up in a public place and give a speech expressing any doubt of the accuracy of the orthodox Holocaust narrative. I’m sure you’d find out fast where the limits are of what is accepted in your community. In some coun-tries, if you still insist on your human right to doubt and to express those doubts publicly, you sooner or later breathe filtered air (within a prison cell), as they say in Germany. There is no compromise and no mercy in this regard.

However, isn’t the foremost lesson to learn from the horrors of the Holocaust that everything needs to be done to prevent a repetition, for which eternal commemoration is the most important prerequisite, and denying it is the first step toward a repetition?

I know how difficult it is to free yourself from the psychological fetters with which we all were raised in our respective societies – or put differently: we were brainwashed. I want to offer some assistance here to achieve this act of liberation.

Imagine you are an alien arriving in a spaceship from a different planet.

You study the various human societies. You determine that western societies have high ideals about civil rights, but realize that there is one excep-tion with regards to one minority and one historical event involving this minority.

The earthlings justify this to the aliens as follows: In order to prevent that books are again burned, dissidents are again imprisoned, and minorities are again persecuted, this time some other books have to be burned, some other dissidents have to be imprisoned, and some other minority persecuted.

How would you justify this evidently paradoxical situation to the alien?

The objective answer lies in research done by individuals who can detach themselves from their society, think outside the box. I quote here the German professor of sociology Dr. Robert Hepp, who has done some research and experiments on the issue of the taboos of “primitive” as well as “progressive” societies in order to be able to compare the two. Here is the summary of what he has found out:6

“Occasional experiments that I have conducted in my seminars convince me that ‘Auschwitz’ [the most well-known site of the Holocaust] is strictly ethnologically speaking one of the few taboo topics that our ‘taboo-free society’ still preserves […]. While they did not react at all to other stimulants, ‘enlightened’ central European students who refused to accept any taboos at all, would react to a confrontation with ‘revisionist’ [denialist] texts’ about the gas chambers at Auschwitz in just as ‘elemental’ a way (including the comparable physiological symptoms) as members of primitive Polynesian tribes would react to an infringement of one of their taboos. The students were literally beside themselves and were neither prepared nor capable of soberly discussing the presented theses. For the sociologist, this is a very important point because a society’s taboos reveal what it holds sacred. Taboos also reveal what the community fears […].
Basically, a ‘modern’ society does not react differently to violations of taboos than does a ‘primitive’ society. Violating a taboo is generally perceived as ‘outrageous’ and ‘atrocious’ and produces spontaneous ‘revulsion’ and ‘horror.’ In the end the perpetrator is isolated, excluded from society, and himself ‘tabooed.’”

That’s the explanation you should to give to your alien visitor: minorities have to be persecuted and their books burned because they have violated a taboo. This does not require any further justification. As a result, the alien would probably consider human societies to be primitive, and rightly so, as Prof. Hepp’s research results have clearly revealed.

How exactly does one taboo a minority in a “modern” society to such a degree that merely mentioning them triggers revulsion, horror and disgust?

How do you get to the point in a “modern” country like Germany where almost everybody agrees that such a minority has to be persecuted, cen-sored and thrown into the dungeons? 

Very easily. During medieval times, you called such persons witches, and all the rest followed automatically. That persons so stigmatized were no witches at all was not revealed, because the topic was taboo, the victims tabooed.

Today we call persons “Nazis”, and exactly the same psychological mechanisms of automatic and generally accepted ostracism and persecution kick in.

Now you may ask, am I against punishing Nazis?
In turn, I ask you: Are you against punishing witches?

What I am trying to point out with this question is the fact that you are asking the wrong question. Nobody deserves being persecuted or punished because some stereotype has been attached to them.

The issue is not whether I am opposed to punishing people who have committed crimes. Whether the ideological background of that crime, if there is any, was witchcraft, black magic, devil worship or National Socialism does not matter at all. The issue is whether someone called a “witch” or a “Nazi” has committed any crime to begin with.

Today’s western societies, and the German society leading among them, have reached a point where curtailing civil rights is justified for the sole reason that this infringement is directed against “Nazis” (or anti-Semites, for that matter). If that is the justification, the public at large is quick to accept that infringement. No one asks anymore whether the individuals who have been slandered, ostracized and cast to the wolves in this way, have done anything to deserve such a punishment.

That’s what my book is about. It shows the many facets of the mechanism which turns innocent people into social pariahs, muzzles them, defames them, drags them into courts of law, sentences them in show trials, punishes them, incarcerates them, ruins their professional existence and turns them into social lepers, with the mass media standing by applauding, and the society at large gawking with satisfaction that once more a dangerous sorcerer (or “Nazi”) has been hunted down successfully.

I wonder whether even a single politician will ever grasp upon which dangerous, monstrous path their society is moving.

In the name of the more than a quarter million Germans who had to suffer criminal investigations for peaceful expressions of their opinions since 1994 – evidence for this can be found in this book – I will not give up hope that one of these days light will shine once more in a country that has, with many other countries, slipped back into the dark Middle Ages*.

Germar Rudolf Red Lion, December 2016

* Middle Ages were as "dark" as Germar Rudolf is "evil Nazi". But since at that time Jews were considered as an alien element, potentially dangerous Middle Ages presently are stigmatized.
We should wish to slipp back into the Middle Ages.

Jewish Messiah fell to his knees and begged the sultan to accept him as a convert

The idea that Zevi was the Messiah had taken such firm root in the mind of his Jewish followers that now they were convinced the moment of his triumph had arrived. The time had come when Zevi was to take the crown from the head of the sultan. After charming him into submission with song, Zevi would place that crown on his own head and inaugurate the kingdom of heaven on earth. Robert de Dreux, a chaplain at the French embassy, recounted later that crowds of Jews ran about spreading carpets over the streets of Adrianople in anticipation of his arrival. When de Dreux gave voice to his skepticism, he was told by an innkeeper's son "there is nothing to scoff at, for before long you will be our slaves by the power of the messiah."274

The Turks had lost none of their shrewdness during the months of Zevi's captivity. They knew that Zevi's death would almost certainly mean a rebellion by the Jews, who were already primed for the arrival of Armageddon. After consulting with the sultan's physician, the apostate Jew Mustapha Fawzi Hayati Zade, the Turks came up with a better strategy. Dragged before the divan, Zevi was given an opportunity to prove he was indeed the messiah. Zevi was to be stripped naked and tied to a post outside the gate of the seraglio, where the sultan's archers would shoot arrows at him. If he were indeed the Messiah, the arrows would not harm him. If he were unsure of whether he were the Messiah and, therefore, unwilling to undergo the test, there was a simpler alternative. Zevi could become a Muslim.

It didn't take Zevi long to decide. Faced with either death or apostasy, Zevi chose apostasy. The Jewish Messiah fell to his knees and begged the sultan to accept him as a convert. For emphasis, Zevi "threw his [Jewish] hat down and spat on it and reviled the Jewish religion publicly desecrated the name of Heaven .... 75 He then "slandered and denounced his faithful believers.".176 Impressed with Zevi's zeal for his new religion, the sultan changed Zevi's name to his own, calling him Mehmed Effendi and granted him a pension of 150 piatres per day as kapici bahsi or keeper of the palace gates. To prove his sincerity in adopting his new faith, Zevi agreed to take one of the queen's slave girls as an additional wife. Sarah didn't seem upset by this arrangement. She was, according to Scholem, "already familiar with the expe-rience of outwardly professing another religion":'77 because of her days in Poland.

Under the tutelage of the sultan's mother, Zevi's wife apostatized too, taking the name Fatima Cadin.

According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, the apostasy of the man the over-whelming number of synagogues in Europe had acknowledged as the Messiah was the greatest catastrophe to strike the Jewish people since the destruction of the Temple. Because of the time lag inherent in communication then, letters were still arriving from Europe offering homage to the failed Jewish messiah a month after his apostasy. On October 9, 1666, the day of Atonement, the Jews of Hamburg pronounced a five-fold blessing over his name. The rabbis of Amsterdam, afflicted by the same time lag, sent a letter of homage that arrived at the time of his apos-tasy. Like Cromwell, Zevi tried to shift the blame for his apostasy onto God. A few days after his conversion, Zevi explained in a letter to one of his brothers, "God has made me an Ishmaelite.">78

Gradually, word of Zevi's apostasy trickled back to Europe during the fall of 1666. On November 10, 1666 Henry Oldenburg wrote he had just received news from Amsterdam that "the King ofthe Jews was turned Turk.">79 He noted that "our Jews">80 didn't believe the news, but by December, news of the apostasy was accepted as undeniably true. Jews who not long before had warned Christians that the tables would soon be turned when Zevi ascended his throne, now had to endure the scorn of Muslims and Christians who ridiculed them mercilessly as blind and credulous fools. Now that Zevi had been marginalized, the sultan could move against the Jews of Turkey with impunity, which he did by having 50 rabbis executed:

Repression was the most common Jewish response to Zevi's apostasy. The rab-bis of Constantinople threatened to expel from the synagogue anyone who even pronounced Zevi's name, and, as if that weren't enough, threatened to hand vio-lators of the ban over to Turkish authorities once they had been expelled. Conversion to Christianity was another response. Jakob Melammed, who taught at a school run by Ashkenazi community in Hamburg, converted with his family in 1676 when he realized "the noise which the Jews had made about their Shabbetai Zevi, for which we had waited for a whole year with fasts and mortifications was all lies." Zevi's apostasy "had aroused in him the first doubts about the Jewish religion."'8.

Docetism was another common response, especially among followers of the cabala. Zevi, according to this explanation, hadn't really converted to Islam. A phantom that resembled Zevi had converted, but the real Zevi had repaired to the vicinity of the Ten Lost Tribes and was even then preparing to lead them back to Jerusalem. Nathan of Gaza claimed Zevi's conversion presented a deep mystery whose meaning Nathan would reveal shortly. Samuel Primo, Zevi's spin doctor, claimed Zevi had undergone a "mock conversion," and that Zevi's duplicity proved he was the real Messiah, because like Moses at Pharaoh's court he was "outwardly sinful" but "inwardly pure.">8.

from the book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit And Its Impact on World History by E. Michael Jones

Quotes from the book Angels Don't Play This HAARP - Advances in Tesla Technology

 

Some of the people were concerned about possible military applications of a technology that could knock out the Internet or blackout the power grid. More close at hand, they figured, what goes up must come down, especially if the radiations bounce off the ionosphere. Wally worried when he heard talk of the HAARP technicians planning to install filters on the radio and satellite receiving dishes in and around every home in the vicinity. The filters would screen out incoming radio wave interference, he was told. He got together with an electronics whiz who lived on an even more remote homestead, to study the proposal for high power beaming. Concerned about their families' health, they came to a conclusion. "It's not innocuous."

Nor was the proposed violation of Earth's atmospheric electrical system, he said. "You read about a tremendous heated plume rising, and raising part of the upper atmosphere with it, and that it could change weather conditions and that the actual effects can be intensified. Then (HAARP spokesmen) come back and say 'don't worry'."

He did worry - about his family on the ground receiving reflected radiation, and then about swans, ducks, geese and other frequent flyers that could be fried in the intense radio frequency beam above the project site. The ionospheric heater, as the HAARP antennae were called, would beam upward in a prime corridor for migrating waterfowl.

Another of the guys in the bush worried that migrating salmon might lose tlieir way, as they use the geomagnetic field as part of tlieir road map for returning to spawning grounds. The magnetically- sensitive material magnetite had been found in salmon, as it had in human brains. Therefore changes in the magnetic field would be confusing, he said. A powerful ionospheric heater such as HAARP could create an artificial electromagnetic storm high above the earth.

"All we have is John Heckscher's comments that there'll be no more magnetic disturbances than what occurs naturally," Wally said skeptically.

The bush dwellers and their science advisors, on the other hand, contended that even naturally occurring disturbances, caused by solar storms, do disrupt living systems. A psychologist at the University of Alaska did a study trying to connect Alaska's high rate of suicides to disturbances from geomagnetic storms generated by the aurora borealis.68 And scientific articles about the sensitivities of living cells and nervous systems said it doesn't take strong magnetic fields to make a difference; 68 Vancouver Province newspaper, "Electric Impulse", Apr. 4, 1995 fluctuations of very weak fields can dramatically affect the cellular level of life. Leaning against the passenger side window of the truck, Nick nodded agreement with tlie NO HAARP researcher. His yeaTS of research had uncovered studies that proved this point.
*
Van Bise, an electronics and biomedical engineer, says bluntly "They're suicidal!" He made the comment after reading about HAARP, the military's plan to pump unprecedented levels of radio frequency power up through the upper atmosphere to heat parts of the unpredictable ionosphere. His concern is that the experimenters admit they do not know what the outcome might be.72

Surprisingly few scientists know about ionospheric heaters. "Why in the world would anyone want to heat up the ionosphere? It's already hot enough," said one head of a large university's physics department. Co-author Manning gave him the benefit of the doubt, but as it turned out, he was not joking. Other department heads at universities with sizable atmospheric physics departments had heard about ionospheric heaters but said their knowledge of the research was vague.

The University of Alaska's geophysical department knows what an ionospheric research instrument is, because their university is directly involved in HAARP funding. But although "auroral research" involvement of the University of Alaska is played up in press releases, HAARP's internal documents say the goal of the experiments is to control ionospheric processes so that they can be exploited by the Department of Defense.

Concerned scientists such as van Bise are doubly discouraged, because the people who want to control the electrojet or make "nuclear-sized explosions"73 or an "artificial cyclotron"74 in the upper atmosphere are the most difficult to stop. Traditionally they have held the biggest handfuls of taxpayers' money. Their power base includes mega-corporation defense contractors and their lobbyists. Few physicists are willing to risk their livelihood (government contracts) by contradicting these people.

Elizabeth Rauscher has a Ph.D., a long and impressive career in high energy physics, and has been published in prestigious science journals and books.75 Yet her warnings apparently go unheeded. For example, in 1984 she presented scientific findings at a Pentagon briefing and then tried to address the colonels and generals person to person about global environmental issues. They refused to respond to her blunt question, "Don't you worry about your children and grandkids?"

Seven years ago Rauscher and her partner William van Bise wrote a paper76 that discussed the earth's magnetic field emanations in technical language, but ended with a strongly worded warning.

Earth and life forms on it vibrate and resonate in harmony, they noted; radiant energy from the sun and materials and vibrations of the earth support life. "Is there a symbiosis between the earth and the life forms upon it?" After mentioning chemical and radioactive pollution of our life support systems, they injected a less-publicized concern, "some of the electromagnetic waves generated by man may have global significance..."
*
As if natural disasters weren't bad enough, the CIA reported that national governments were already able to manipulate weather for military purposes. The editorialist had an impertinent thought: "It is difficult to read the CIA report without wondering whether some of the climatic aberrations in recent years may not have been part of military experimental programs."

Saturday Review's 1977 editorial used strong words to describe the desensitization of the public and decision makers - a deadening of moral indignation tliat came from seeing an endless procession of super-weapons. That process was described as mass insanity. "If the collective conscience does not now respond, then all our philosophy and religion and education,..have been abstract, irrelevant, futile."

The collective conscience was silent, however, and by 1995 the military has had another 18 years to work on weather warfare methods, which it euphemistically calls weather modification. For example, rainmaking technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The DoD sampled lightning and hurricane- manipulation studies in Project Skyfire and Project Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated technologies that would give big effects. Lowell Ponte, author of The Cooling, says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which they figured could damage the ozone layer over an enemy. Looking at ways to cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of the project code named Prime Argus, decades ago. The money for tliat came from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, now under the acronym ARPA.)
*

*
The next year the Air Force revealed a bit more - its Spacecast 2020 master plan includes weather control as a possible new weapons initiative. Defense News excerpted the report. Under "weather control", the article said that scientists have experimented with weather control since the 1940's, but Spacecast 2020 noted that "using environmental modification techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state are prohibited". Having said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in technology "compels a reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic. "92

What could the new technology do? For one, military forces may have the tool for zapping a hole through a cloud in order to target their enemy. That would be costly and risky, but "the potential benefits for national security could be even higher".

Air Force officials said the weather control section of their report is classified and won't be released. 40

YEARS OF ZAPPING THE SKY?

As far back as 1958, the chief White House advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. DoD was studying "ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the weather" by using an electronic beam to ionize or deionize the atmosphere over a given area.93

In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald, associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee, and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental control technologies for military purposes. MacDonald made a revealing comment:

"The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy. "94

MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, "How To Wreck The Environment", for the book Unless Peace Comes.95 he was not kidding around. In the text he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation utilizing the planet's energy fields. He also said that these types of
weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by their victims. He was not some wire haired fanatic when he made these observations in 1966 - he had the credentials of a world recognized scientist. What his futuristic concepts became, are tlie tilings which projects like HAARP are made of...

U.S. Congress' subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International Environment looked into military weather and climate modification conducted in the early 1970's. "What emerged was an awesome picture of far ranging research and experimentation by the DoD into ways environmental tampering could be used as a weapon," said Lowell Ponte.96

The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into the state of tlie art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may find out that technologies developed out of the HAARP experiments in Alaska could deliver on Gordon MacDonald's vision, because leading edge scientists are describing global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems, but also as an electrical system.

'SMALL INPUT, BIG EFFECT'

A point to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with Earth's magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to the earth's surface, says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina. HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable.

"If the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently disturbed. "97

It is reasonable to expect Earth's relatively thin atmosphere of insulating gas (water vapor) to be mechanically pushed and pulled by tlie surrounding electrical forces, Yost says. Electrical currents in tlie ionosphere are said to be 100 times larger than those produced lower down at any moment by all tlie world's thunderstorms. Yost concludes that electrical forces should be included along with thermodynamics, gravity waves and effects of Earth's rotation, as causes of weather variations. According to his experiments and analyses, ionospheric currents and changing magnetic fields in Hie ionosphere must produce "global oscillating gradients" that go down as far as the ground.
*
What about HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not much compared to the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP documents admit that thousandfold greater amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than injected. As with MacDonald's "key to geophysical warfare", "nonlinear" effects (described in the literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small input and large output.

At a 1983 science conference in Atlanta, one of the presentations held clues about where engineers and physicists were heading with that small input/ large output goal.99 E.E. Richards talked about the above mentioned Stanford University experiment in beaming VLF radio waves to the magnetosphere. The signals followed the curves of the magnetic field and swung back to Earth. They were detected halfway around the world away from their origin in California. In some cases the signals were amplified a thousand times.

What strengthens these radio signals a thousandfold? According to Richards' research, the signals gather energy from electrons within the Van Allen radiation belts which surround Earth's atmosphere. Each time one of the world's fifty or so VLF (3 to 30 KHz) transmitters sends out its signal; streams of excited particles from the outermost regions of the magnetosphere cascade into our atmosphere. "Even low frequency (LF: 30-300 KHz) radio waves leak into the upper layers, causing this same phenomenon. The injection of small signals into the energy belts creates something like a super-transistor effect, altering the motion of free electrons thousands of miles out from the earth's surface. This Tesla Magnifying Resonance effect can control enormous energies by minuscule triggering signals." As did Nikola Tesla, Richards works with the principle of resonance. (...)

E.E. Richards reported the following conclusions from his search of the literature. "The conducting ionosphere can affect the instability by short circuiting the electrostatic part of the earth electric field, thus requiring less energy to release charge from the upper layers. These auroral arcs result in an acceleration process called ring currents, precessing along the magnetic field lines that connect the magnetotail with the ionosphere. This is the primary supply of energy for the auroras..."

He explains how electrostatic waves stimulate the ionosphere, allowing the powerful radiations described above to flow in from space. He adds that observations from satellites and from the ground tend to confirm Nikola Tesla's claims about his Colorado Springs experiments. "With his oscillator he was able to stimulate the ionosphere through high voltage, and then allow the cascading of the upper layer currents, thereby simulating the natural action of the aurora and also of lightning."

Tesla was one of several inventors cited by E.E. Richards who were on the path to using the "abundant energy source that surrounds us each minute". Humanity lives within the cosmically stimulated bubble of the magnetosphere, Richards said, and upon the twirling spherical generator that is the earth. In the spirit of previous generations of scientists called natural philosophers, he is awed by the beauty of the system. 

*
There was another unexpected discovery of an atmospheric phenomenon in 1993. It was found that the Earth's lower atmosphere contains "rivers of water vapor rivaling the Amazon in the massiveness of their flow". 104 Reginald E. Newell of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reported that these vapor rivers were the main mechanism for moving water from the equatorial regions of the earth to the poles. However, he did not expect to find that the water vapor was contained in narrow bands which are 420 to 480 miles wide and up to 4,800 miles long. These bands are about 1.9 miles above the earth, and have flow volumes of 165 million kilograms of water per second. The observers found that there are five atmospheric rivers in the Northern Hemisphere and five in the Southern Hemisphere, each with these typical flow rates.

We speculate that if HAARP were located at the right place, it could be used to deflect these flows in a way that alter weather patterns. This is another concern which should be considered in the operation of HAARP - a fact not known before HAARP was planned.

BEAMING ABOUT TESLA'S ELECTRIC GUN

Weapons-oriented researchers, on the other hand, are quite interested in other, more invasive, aspects of Tesla's knowledge besides resonance, such as the "explosive channelization of air" which he is said to have learned about this phenomena as he injected successive pulses of energy along the same channel, According to Dr. J.F.X.Daum, Ken Corum and Dr. James Corum, Teste experimented with atmospheric tunneling. By the 3930's Teste had invented a "channelized beam composed of a coherent burst of electrically charged material particles" moving as fast as the speed of light. The three scientists calculated that such a particle beam would easily pierce armored vehicles. 105

COULD THEY SHORT CIRCUIT EARTH?

Earth as a spherical electrical system is a fairly well accepted model. However, those experimenters who want to make unnatural power connections between parts of this system might not be thinking of possible consequences. Electrical motors and generators can be caused to wobble when their circuits are affected. Could human activities cause a significant change in a planet's electrical circuit or electrical field? A quote plucked from a lengthy paper in the respected journal Science deals with manmade ionization from radioactive material, but perhaps it could also be studied with HAARP-type skybusters in mind:

"For example, while changes in the earth's electric field resulting from a solar flare modulating conductivity may have only a barely detectable effect on meteorology, the situation may be different in regard to electric field changes caused by manmade ionization,,." 106

Meteorology, of course, is the study of the atmosphere and weather. Ionization is what happens when a higher level of power is zapped into atoms and knocks electrons off the atoms. The resulting charged particles are the stuff of HAARP. "One took at the weather should tell us that we are on the wrong path," says Paul Schaefer, electrical engineer, commenting on HAARP-type technologies.

An administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration once said, "It is not possible to draw clear distinctions between research and technological development on weather modification for hostile and non-hostile purposes."
*
Manning thought about the enthusiastic attitude of the scientists and military contractors whom tlie NO HAARP group called "tlie big boys with Hie big toys". Those big time experimenters admit that they don't know what will happen when they push ionospheric heating experiments into the next level of effects. They seem to be excited about the macho adventure of passing tlie next "threshold of effects" in tlie ionosphere, and do not hesitate to pump gigawatts of power up there and intentionally accelerate particles in the ionosphere to "relativistic" speeds - nearly the speed of light. Why would they be so irresponsible?

Trombly answered in a word - denial. The decision makers are not being malicious, Trombly said; they are just refusing to face the facts about how flimsy is tlie web of life on Earth. "We do not want to admit that we are in a situation that is tenuous, where there are gradual (planetary) processes that are punctuated by catastrophic processes."

Specialists tend to look at their own experiments as isolated incidents, without seeing long term effects on larger systems, Trombly noted. As Manning heard him talk about lack of respect for Earth's systems, she thought about a professor she had interviewed who was connected with HAARP. The professor's enthusiasm encompassed the possibility of HAARP creating a massive airglow in the ionosphere, and of giving his doctoral students some technical challenges so they could get their Ph.D.s.

Could their experiments set off a catastrophe? The research of the Institute for Advanced Studies looks into such questions. For example, earth monitoring with sensitive instruments revealed a connection between underground nuclear tests and earthquakes.

While nuclear explosions zap more high energy particles into our global environment, HAARP specifically gives a sharp jab to the ionosphere. Trombly is concerned about atmospheric storms "once you create a point-like stress differential... What is it going to do in terms of gating influx from particles, from the magnetosphere down?...we already have real problems with particle influx into this planet, now."
*
Flanagan's Brain Tool

In 1958 when Dr. Patrick Flanagan was 14 years old, he invented the Neurophone, which won him world recognition as one of the brightest inventors of our time. The Neurophone device can convert sound (like words and music) into electrical impulses which can be transferred through any point on the body directly into the brain, bypassing the ear and associated hearing mechanisms entirely. For more than six years the United States Patent Office refused to issue a patent for the device while they debated the fine points of the technology. In the end, the government declared that the Neurophone would never work, and refused the patent. Patrick and his lawyer then went to Washington D.C. with a working model of the device to show the patent examiner. The examiner told the duo that if the device could make one of their employees who was deaf hear, he would reopen the case and issue the patent. The device was tested, the employee "heard" and the patent was granted. (...)

The Neurophone was one of the most powerful brain entrainment devices developed until new advances were made in tlie science in Europe in 2001. In recent years, these other researchers have advanced the technology and continued to work on the possibilities it offers, with an emphasis on other modes of transmission. Given tlie Defense Intelligence Agency's interest in the earlier device, it is very likely that they have also continued to woTk to improve it. Discussions with several inventors over the last few years about the HAARP project revealed that this radio transmitter, tlie ionospheric heater, could possibly be used as a wireless brain entrainment device. This use has the greatest invasive possibilities.234

It is pure charity to call the political dealings of those officials stupidity instead of treason,

Two degrees of political stupidity are to be found in diplomacy. The first is short-range: lack of political skill, inability to carry on any negotiations successfully and to recognise short-term advantages. The second is long-range: lack of political far-sightedness, ignorance of deeper power-currents and the Ponderables of the Becoming. These two kinds of political stupidity stand in the same relation to each other as the Military stands to the Political.

The Military is the weapon and the servant of the Political. Only disaster can come of military thought dominating political thought. “Win the War!”

can never be an expression of Politics, for Politics is concerned with identifying the power-currents, choosing the Enemy, and weighing in relation to the national interest all happenings, inner and outer, accord-ing to how the war develops. To elevate the slogan “Win the War!” to the rank of policy, as America did during the Second World War, is the equivalent of saying that there is nothing political about the war. Military thought is simply not political thought. The permanent ambition of all military thought is to win a military victory; the corresponding ambition of all political thought is to win more power. That may or may not be implicit in a policy that seems to desire military victory at whatever cost, for one can probably adduce just as many historical examples of politi-cal and military victory occurring separately as of both coinciding neu-trally. Likewise, if short-range political thinking constantly prevails over the long-range in the policy decisions of a state, the only possible result is that state’s political extinction. No matter how skillfully executed its political manoeuvres, if a state has ignored the larger power-currents in puzzling out its policy, it will suffer a political defeat.

All these explanations and definitions apply only to real political units, for the microscopic destinies of such dwarfish “states” as San Marino, Monaco, and Belgium are completely determined by the Destinies of the true political units, the Great Powers, as the diplomatic concert of the 19th century liked to call them.

The Polish officials of 1939 were politically stupid in the first sense.
Their country encircled by two Great Powers that had just concluded a non-aggression pact, they nonetheless chose to enter upon a war that would mean for it direct, permanent political extinction in the least desirable form: occupation and partition. Actually, it is pure charity to call the political dealings of those officials stupidity instead of treason, for shortly after the beginning of the War, they disappeared, going abroad to live on the capital they were able to amass owing to their policy.

Treason and political stupidity are closely related to each other. In The Proclamation o f London it is stated: “Treason is nothing but incapacity when it becomes resolute.” As used here, the word “treason” refers to treasonous conduct on the part of individuals. An individual may be able to better his personal-economic circumstances through an act of treason, 14 but no group, no class, no organic stratum within a country is ever able to better the power-position of the country through a large-scale act of treason.

In this sense, all treason is political stupidity.

The English officials of 1939 were politically stupid in the second sense in that they completely failed to identify the larger power-currents and likewise totally lacked statesmanlike feeling for the Definition of Enemy: The Enemy is the state that one can defeat and thereby gain more power. * Thus military victory over an opponent whose defeat proves so costly that one must take in the bargain a greater loss of power elsewhere must be called political defeat.

These English officials approached diplomatic preparations for the Second World War according to the old tried and true methods. They attempted to isolate Germany, concluding wherever possible war-alliances with Germany’s neighbours (the “Peace Front”). They counted on American aid, trusting in the Washington regime’s assurances that it would be able to lead America to war-despite the geopolitical position of America, despite the unanimous opposition of the American people, despite the conflict between intervention and the national interests of America, and finally, despite the fundamental spiritual indifference of Americans towards even a victorious war against Europe.

The question they failed to ask was: What is the final political aim? Or in other words: How will England’s power be increased through a victorious American war against Germany? Had they asked this question, it would have been obvious to them that, since England could not win this war alone, any extension of power derived from a defeat of Germany would be for the benefit of America, or some other power. The result of their failure to ask this question was England’s total defeat.

The suicide-policy of the English regime in 1939-it was continued throughout the War-has various roots, and the ultimate explanation of it will keep scholars and archivists busy. The essential facts are already well-known.

First, political stupidity alone is not to blame: Some members of the government consciously and deliberately pursued a policy that was not pro-English, only anti-German. Second, some members of this regime were not officially part of the government, indeed, not even part of the English organism. Third, and most importantly, with Joseph Chamberlain the rich political tradition of England had been laid to rest. The succeeding statesmen were of lesser calibre; class-warriors, like Lloyd George and MacDonald; pure egotists, capable of representing any alien interest, like Churchill and Eden; even obsessed psychopaths, like Duff Cooper.

Thomas Hardy did well to introduce the Spirit of Irony into his Napoleonic drama, The Dynasts, in which the paradoxical and the ironic make up the favourite conversation of Clio. How ridiculous in retrospect now seem the efforts of those officials in London during the period from 1939 to 1941:

They sought to drag America into the War! In reality, the War was from beginning to end a creation of the Washington regime. If it ended in victory, victory could mean only an increase in power for that regime, or some other political unit, but in no case for England. The English nation was impressed into the War as a vassal that had been made to believe it was acting independently, and it emerged from the War with every characteristic of a colony. Only the definitive, legalistic formulation was wanting. Those at the head of the London regime who were honest, if also stupid, schemed to use America for their purposes. And precisely because of their scheming, they were used to forward the ambitions of the Washington regime.

from the book Yockey Francis Parker - The enemy of Europe

Gulf War illness and Joyce Riley

 Joyce Riley came from a military family. Her father had been a belly gunner on a B-17. Every night before she went to bed, he played the US Air Force song:

Off we go into the wild blue yonder,

Climbing high into the sun

Here they come zooming to meet our thunder

At ’em boys, Give ’er the gun!

Down we dive, spouting our flame from under

Off with one helluva roar!

We live in fame or go down in flame. Hey!

Nothing can stop the US Air Force!

Wanting to improve the world by helping the sick, Joyce studied nursing at the University of Kansas and graduated with a Bachelor of Science. As a director of nursing in four institutions, she specialised in medical surgical nursing and organ transplantation. She assisted in heart, lung, liver and kidney transplants and helped cancer patients. She flew around the US transporting organs to operating rooms. 

By 1990, the year of Bush’s Gulf War, Joyce was in the military serving as a flight nurse, but she wasn’t dispatched to the Middle East. In one day, she received ten injections and wrote in her journal, “I would have taken a hundred shots today just to save my country.” She knew about people passing out receiving shots, but she didn’t know what it meant. 

Six months after the vaccinations, Joyce became so ill that she could barely walk or function. After the Gulf War ended in February 1991, Joyce was hospitalised in Houston and told that she had an illness like MS. As she hadn’t been deployed to the Middle East and therefore hadn’t been exposed to oil-well fires or chemical or biological weapons, she suspected that her illness might be related to the vaccines. She decided never to take a vaccine again as long as she lived or to give any vaccines. 

Within six months of taking their vaccines, other nurses became sick. When Joyce told her superiors, she was told she had a mental problem. “There are so many of us who are sick here,” Joyce said. “So many! What are we gonna do?”

“They’re not sick,” said Colonel Mountain, the commander of the unit. “You’re not sick. Nobody’s sick.”

Joyce and the sick nurses went to the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The VA told them that because they were in the reserves, they were ineligible for treatment. Joyce was shocked, not because of the lack of treatment, but because she wanted to find out why they were all sick. 

Further research led her to discover that the Reagan-Bush administration had sold chemical and biological weapons worth billions to Iraq before the Gulf War. Aware that Saddam Hussein had repeatedly used chemical weapons on Iranian soldiers and Iraq’s Kurdish minority, the Reagan-Bush administration helped Iraq develop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs. Joyce even obtained the batch numbers and dates that the weapons were sold. With billions from oil revenues and loans from its Arab neighbors, Iraq became one of the biggest arms importers in the world. Countries competed to sell arms to Saddam Hussain as he built a million-man army and spent over $50 billion on military hardware.

By attacking Iraq, a country that Bush had helped to arm – a manoeuvre that probably made Prescott Bush smirk in his grave – US weapons manufacturers reaped billions of dollars from US taxpayers and money staked by Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Destabilising the Middle East made the price of a barrel of oil soar from $15 to $42, generating billions in revenue for the multinational oil companies controlling the oilfields in which the Bush family and their associates held investments. 

Joyce also discovered that huge profits were being made from the Gulf War by pharmaceutical companies – another fertile area of Bush family investments and directorships. She found out about secret vaccine trials undertaken by the Tri-Service Vaccine Task Force, and that the Bush government was doing experiments with the same chemical and biological weapons they’d sold to Iraq in order to develop a vaccine that would be effective against what they knew the troops would be exposed to.

Joyce believes that anthrax, hepatitis B and experimental vaccines made numerous soldiers sick, a situation that was exacerbated in cases were the shots had been administered on the same day. The military introduced a new policy. You could get compensation for MS if you reported it within one year of leaving the military. MS is rarely seen in the male population from seventeen to twenty, but numerous Gulf War veterans in that age bracket started to have symptoms of a demyelinating disease – a disease in which the myelin sheath comes off the nerve ending and it misfires horribly. It’s like having a seizure where you’re awake and alert, but your body can’t stop doing the things it’s doing.

Joyce took all of the documents to her attorney and spread them out on a big table.

Examining the documents, he turned pale. “I’m no longer your attorney. I will not watch after you. I cannot do anything for you. I couldn’t handle the tax audit that I’d get if I helped you.” She never saw him again.

Joyce travelled across the country speaking at veterans’ groups such as the American Legions and the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Her tour infuriated Bush’s Department of Defense. The commander of the American Legion in Washington DC issued a memo banning Joyce from any American Legion venue on the grounds that she was falsely trying to make veterans think that they were sick. They ejected her from their facilities. Other organisations tried to destroy her credibility. She had a sign on her car: American Veterans Gulf War Association. She got stopped by the police so much that she had to remove the sign.

In one state, a highway-patrol pulled her over. 

“What’s wrong, officer?” she said.

“Ma’am, I could get fired for what I’m doing,” the policeman said. “I’m not supposed to stop you. I don’t have a reason to stop you.”

“What’s the matter?”

“Ma’am, I think I’ve heard you. Are you the nurse on Art Bell [a radio show]?”

“Yes.”

“I just had a baby born that’s deaf. I wanna know have you heard about any other babies that have been born deaf because their parents had served in the Gulf War?”

“Yes, I’m sorry to tell you.”

The officer’s eyes filled with shock and sadness. “Because I called the DOD and the VA, and they told me that no other babies had been born deaf.”

“They’re lying to you.”

He began to cry. 

She received a letter from a veteran, who’d been a highway patrolman for twenty-nine years. Never in his career had he felt the need to shoot anybody. After Desert Storm, he had an urge to kill himself or someone else. Thinking he was crazy, his wife left him after over twenty years of marriage. He felt his life was ruined and wanted to die. Joyce offered to contact his wife. She explained about the prevalence of Gulf War syndrome. It wasn’t her husband’s fault. He needed help. They reconciled and sent Joyce a thank-you letter with a picture of them.

In California, Joyce was speaking at a Veterans auditorium about the large amount of veterans coming home from the Gulf War with herpes, yet they hadn’t been unfaithful. The audience was shocked. A couple on the third row began to cry and hold each other. Joyce stopped the meeting. “Can I help you? What’s going on?”

“I’m a pastor of my local church here,” the man said. “I was a chaplain in the Gulf War. I came home from the Gulf War with herpes and I was never unfaithful to my wife. My wife and I have gone through hell because she could never trust me. She never believed me.”

“Now we have a marriage again,” his wife said, in-between sobbing. “If only I would have known this.”

In Indiana, Joyce was talking to a group about veterans’ children who had been affected by Gulf War illness. Uniforms brought home from the Gulf War were contaminating kids. The uniforms contain depleted uranium and traces of chemical and biological weapons, none of which washed out. 

“If anybody brought home uniforms,” Joyce said, “be very careful of the equipment that you have and where you store it. The chemicals in the uniforms and equipment can affect your family members, and make them ill.” 

At the back of the room, a lady started crying. Joyce called a break and approached the lady. “What’s going on?”

“When my husband came back from the war,” she said, “shortly after that, my son started behaving really bizarre and started throwing up and being sick. They told me he was just imagining it and acting out. He was really sick and he’s only four, but they put him in a psychiatric facility and started giving him all these drugs. He got worse and worse on the drugs and he’s in that psych facility now. He’s been there for two months and they’re saying that it’s just because he wants to be sick for whatever reason. Now I know why my son is really sick, but I can’t get him out of there.”

“Do you have any of your husband’s equipment?” The woman began to get hysterical and couldn’t talk. “What’s the matter?”

“All of my husband’s uniforms and all of his equipment are stored under my boy’s bed.”

“Oh dear God! You’ve got to get that out of there.”

“I’m going to the hospital right now. I’m going to tell them what you just told me and I’m going to get my son out of the hospital.” The mother was able to retrieve her son.

A US representative sent his team to see her talk. During the meeting, five team members furiously scribbled notes. At the half-time break, they called her over. “The representative has a message for you.”

“Really,” Joyce said.

“The representative wants you to know that he’s not gonna support you.”

“Well, nobody else has either… But why is he not gonna support this?”

“He says you know a lot about this, but you don’t know it all. If you knew the rest of the story and the public knew, it would bring down this country as we know it. His message to you is, ‘Keep doing what you’re doing. Don’t stop.’”

Joyce helped make a documentary, Beyond Treason, about Gulf War illness. It included testimony from Lieutenant Doug Rokke, a US Army Health Physicist Nuclear Medicine Sciences Officer with expertise in nuclear, biological and chemical warfare operations. He stated that exposure to depleted uranium was a major cause of his Gulf War illness. The US military granted him disabled status due to depleted uranium and other exposures. “All of the Iraqi equipment and a lot of the US equipment contained radiological components. When that equipment was blown up, the radiological materials were released into the environment, exposing and contaminating. And then to top it all off, we used uranium munitions known as depleted uranium. They’ve been used back in 1973 by the Israelis against the Egyptians, but during Gulf War One, Desert Shield and Desert Storm, we took it to a totally new level. The use of radioactive materials on the battlefield. Deliberately taking tons and tons, actually taking over 350 tons of solid radioactive materials and dispersed it across Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Taking our radioactive waste and throwing it in somebody else’s backyard.”

 Depleted uranium has a half-life of 4.468 billion years. Iraq and all of the countries contaminated with it since the Gulf War will be toxic for a while – exacerbated by Bush’s son who employed the same war strategies as his father. Dust storms recycle the DU onto civilian populations. DU is invisible and the particles are so small that they get through the protective masks and clothing issued by the military. 

Birth defects and cancer rates, including leukaemia, have skyrocketed in Iraq. In 2004, Fallujah was bombarded, causing cancer and infant mortality rates to exceed those reported after atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Babies have been born with organs outside their bodies, one eye on the forehead, known as Cyclops babies, limbs growing out of heads, multiple heads, spina bifida, brain dysfunction, spinal conditions, unformed limbs and cleft palate… The first question parents in Iraq have started asking isn’t about the sex of their baby, but rather, whether it’s normal. Many mothers have watched their babies die shortly after birth. Some women in Fallujah have avoided pregnancy. 

Joyce got a call from a navy commander at the Pentagon about her documentary, Gulf War Illness Fact or Fiction. “I want you to know that you are not to give out that documentary to anyone in the military.”

“Pardon,” Joyce said. “What’s inaccurate in it?”

“It’s not that. It’s that you are one of us. It’s not allowed to be given out.”

“No, sir. If you think I’m going to participate in the wholesale manslaughter of our military, you’re wrong. Until you can show me what’s inaccurate, I’m going to continue to give it out.” Immediately, Joyce had a thousand extra DVDs made because she feared her home would be raided and her inventory seized. 

Bush’s Department of Defense tried to sabotage her talks. Joyce was asked to speak at a college in Michigan. The night before, Joyce received a call from the college: “Joyce, we’ve got a problem. The DOD has called here three times. They don’t want you to speak and they told us not to allow you to speak.”

“Really! What are you going to do?”

“We’ve decided that if they would call three times to tell us that we shouldn’t hear it, we probably need to hear it.”

“Great. I’ll be there.”

Joyce arrived at the college at 4 pm for dinner with the PR people and the alumni. The PR director was summoned to the phone. When he returned, he told Joyce, “We’ve got a problem. The DOD just landed at the airport in a DOD plane. They’re coming to the meeting.” 

“Fantastic. That is the best thing that I could imagine.”

Before the talk, he said, “Are you sure you want to do this? Three people from the DOD are here.”

“Absolutely! Everything I have to say is true and accurate or I wouldn’t be saying it.”

Joyce entered a full auditorium. After introducing herself, she said, “How many of you are students?” Numerous hands shot up. “How many of you are professors?” They raised their hands. “How many of you all were paid to be here tonight?” Not one hand went up. “I understand there are three people from the DOD here, from the Secretary of Defense’s Office and I’d like to have them recognised.” No hands went up. “Since I’m only a captain and I understand that Lieutenant Colonel Thompson is here, I defer the rank. I’d like for you to be recognised, sir. I don’t want to continue until you’re recognised.” For a few seconds, it remained quiet until suddenly, three people stood up on the back row. “I want to welcome you here tonight and I want you to know that I’m going to say some of the most damning evidence ever against the Department of Defense and I’m going to prove it with your own documents. But before I begin, I want you to agree that if there is anything that I say that’s inaccurate here tonight, I want you to stop me or it will stand as accurate.” Joyce began to speak and go through all of the documents. Not once did any of the men stand. At the end of the three hours, they scurried away.

Upset by Joyce, the DOD called a press conference. They invited media people who’d attended Joyce’s talk. In a light blue uniform, Colonel Thompson did a PowerPoint on the magnificence of the military and how wrong Joyce Riley was. 

After ten minutes, an investigative reporter stood up. “Colonel Thompson, I think I need to stop you and tell you that I don’t think there’s one person in this audience who believes a word that you’re saying. Is it true, like Captain Riley said, that the US sold weapons to Iraq before the Gulf War. Is that accurate?”

“There’s no way that we could possibly know that because that’s all compartmentalised information. I’m sure Joyce doesn’t have anything that could prove that.”

“You saw her show the evidence of the sale of those biologicals to Iraq last night. There’s not a person believing anything that you are saying here.”

An aide emerged from the side of the curtain. “Colonel Thompson, you’re needed in Washington immediately. Your plane is ready to leave.”

The colonel abandoned the press conference. 

As an increasing amount of troops got sick from Bush’s Gulf War, Joyce refused to shut up. She started her own radio show, The Power Hour, talking about Gulf War illness. She received letters from thousands of ill people, who were being told there was nothing wrong with them. The government had lied to them so continuously that they didn’t understand their situations. They’d served their country their whole lives. They were told to obey and take orders and if they got sick they’d be taken care of. After registering as sick, they were told they had mental problems and placed on psychotropic drugs manufactured by companies that had contributed to Bush’s election campaign. This didn’t make any sense to them. It made financial sense to the companies supplying vaccines and drugs. SSRI drugs were being used to keep veterans quiet and so their illnesses could be classified as mental. The abandonment by the military is one of the causes of so many veterans committing suicide.

“They’re just writing me off,” a veteran said on a call to Joyce. “I’m non-commissioned. I’ve been in the military for twenty-seven years and they won’t take care of me. I’m going to be going over to the VA one last time because now I’m in a wheelchair. I cannot walk. So now they’re gonna have to listen to me. My wife is gonna take me over there and our children are gonna go over there and we’re gonna get an answer today regardless.”

“Great. Call me after you go the meeting with them and let me know.”

He went to the meeting. “I’m in a wheelchair. Now will you guys believe me that I am sick and I don’t have a mental problem?”

The doctor went over to the veteran’s wife. “Look, I hate to have to tell you this, but we gave your husband a psych evaluation and we think he’s a latent homosexual and that’s why he’s doing this to himself.”

Angry, the veteran’s wife grabbed the physician’s white jacket. “How dare you say that to my husband in front of his family! You know that is so far from being true!” The family was ejected from the VA hospital.

Joyce became familiar with the tricks of the medical staff who’d stop at nothing to convince veterans that their problems were psychological. The first thing they did was to give psych evaluations, so they could always find a fall-back reason for the illness. If that didn’t work, they humiliated or embarrassed them. 

While the Bush dynasty fortune increased from war profiteering, officials continued to tell veterans that the government had played no role in their Gulf War illness, even though the government knew it was a lie.

From: American MadeWho Killed Barry Seal? Pablo Escobar or George HW Bush

War on Drugs Book 2

by Shaun Attwood