American History Z - extracts

 The devastating crack ultimately peeked out on September 2nd, 2024, when Tucker Carlson decided to release a new podcast episode. In the episode, Tucker had brought on a man named Darryl Cooper. Darryl had a podcast of his own called MartyrMade in which he covered all kinds of extensive and nuanced history. He often provided a fairly novel perspective that challenged the traditionally presented story about things. Not too many people in the mainstream had heard of Darryl before his appearance on Tucker. That was about to change.

Tucker provocatively introduced Cooper to the world as the most important and popular historian in the country, immediately piquing the curiosity of his viewers. The two men went on to have a conversation that covered many things, but most notably, World War II. However, this wasn’t your typical discussion about “the war.”

Darryl’s perspective on World War II wasn’t anything like the narrative that we’d heard growing up. His viewpoint basically rejected most of the fundamental, foundational facts that we’d been taught over the course of our entire lives, and on which so much of American — and more broadly Western — political discourse had been based. Surprisingly, Tucker didn’t contest these views. In fact, Tucker egged him on.

A nuclear bomb was set off across the West as soon as Darryl said:

I think, and maybe I’m being a little hyperbolic, maybe, but I told him, maybe trying to provoke him a little bit, that I thought Churchill was the chief villain of the Second World War. Now, he didn’t kill the most people. He didn’t commit the most atrocities. But I believe — I think when you really get into it and tell the story right and don’t leave anything out, you see that he was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did. Becoming something other than an invasion of Poland.

When Darryl suggested that Winston Churchill could’ve perhaps been a villain, rather than an indisputable hero, most people couldn’t handle it. The magic protecting Churchill was far too strong for the average man to grapple with this type of a challenge. The majority of the West assumed Darryl had to be deviously twisting the narrative here. There was no other explanation for this.

After his first devastating comment, Darryl then followed it up with another atomic blast:

You know, Germany, look, they put themselves into a position — and Adolf Hitler is chiefly responsible for this, but his whole regime is responsible for it — that when they went into the East in 1941, they launched a war where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war, of local political prisoners and so forth that they were going to have to handle. They went in with no plan for that, and they just threw these people into camps, and millions of people ended up dead there. You know, you have, you have like letters as early as July-August 1941 from commandants of these makeshift camps that they’re setting up for these millions of people who were surrendering or people they’re rounding up and they’re — so it’s two months after, a month or two after Barbarossa was launched, and they’re writing back to the high command in Berlin saying, ‘We can’t feed these people, we don’t have the food to feed these people.’ And one of them actually says, ‘Rather than wait for them all to slowly starve this winter, wouldn’t it be more humane to just finish them off quickly now?

When Darryl’s words implied that the Holocaust may not have been an entirely ruthless, calculated extinction event, people were almost universally horrified. No part of that could be true based on what we’d been taught growing up.

The public’s reaction to Cooper’s appearance was so visceral for one very specific reason. Darryl’s propositions had directly challenged the validity of two of the greatest load-bearing myths in our society. Those myths being that the Holocaust was the most evil, intentional act in all of history, and that Hitler was the devil incarnate. The meltdown from Conservative Inc., as well as from liberals, was cataclysmic.

A senior deputy press secretary for the White House came out and said: “giving a microphone to a Holocaust denier who spreads Nazi propaganda is a disgusting and sadistic insult to all Americans, to the memory of the over six million Jews who were genocidally murdered by Adolf Hitler, to the service of the millions of Americans who fought to defeat Nazism, and to every subsequent victim of Antisemitism.”

The Anti-Defamation League then posted to X: “Tucker Carlson’s praise of Nazi apologist Darryl Cooper is an insult to the memory of the 6,000,000 Jews who were murdered by Hitler’s Nazi regime.” Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL, fiercely reiterated the same sentiment.

The denunciation didn’t come purely from the left, though. Lots of conservatives also took shots at Darryl.

Ben Shapiro called Cooper a “fake historian and pseudo-Nazi apologist” and went on to complain about the rise of antisemitism. It was curious that Shapiro had never cared about the rampant anti-White rhetoric within our society.

Liz Cheney also chimed in: “Actually, this is pro-Nazi propaganda, including, ‘Churchill was the chief villain of WW2’ and Hitler ‘didn’t want to fight.’ No serious or honorable person would support or endorse this type of garbage.”

Darryl was predictably smeared as a Holocaust denier, antisemite, and overall traitor to Western civilization. This was totally in line with the standard reaction that we’d always seen from the older generations whenever these topics were broached. Almost nobody was surprised by it. What those who run our society were not prepared for was the reaction from Gen Z.

Gen Z was not innately triggered by Darryl’s comments. We did, however, notice that every critical response to Darryl seemed to be an automatic, over-the-top condemnation that reinforced the approved narrative. It was a reflex. There was absolutely no substantive refutation of Darryl’s actual claims. We didn’t see any real attempt to prove Darryl wrong. Instead, Cooper got a sweeping denunciation. He was a pseudo-historian!

We’d seen this before.

The reactions to Darryl’s statements were a little bit too hysterical for us not to notice. It had reminded us an awful lot of some of the establishment’s reactions that we’d witnessed in the recent past. Particularly when other clearly false yet mythologized societal narratives had been challenged by those who weren’t part of the expert class.

While the other narratives hadn’t gone down easy, this one was much, much stronger than anything we’d come across before. We’d found ourselves up against some of the most ancient magic within our civilization. Up to that very moment in time, the force field surrounding World War II had essentially been impenetrable for a full eight decades. Previously, nobody could’ve imagined questioning the details surrounding the unambiguously evil Nazi regime. The aura protecting these incantations was starting to waver for the very first time.

The liberal order had sowed the seeds of its own destruction. They thought that if they were loud enough in their insistence that their claims were so unbelievably and indisputably true, nobody would dare to question them. But their hubris over the last decade had loosened far too much of their grip. Young men now had the strength to resist even their most potent charms.

We then started to wonder why the Holocaust was considered to objectively be the worst thing to have happened in all of history. Why did we spend so much time learning about it in American schools? Why was there a Holocaust museum in every single city? This had happened in another century, on another continent, and involved groups of people that none of us were a part of. What was going on here?

We started to also wonder what technically made Hitler the incontrovertibly worst human to ever live. Of course, we were always told that it was because of the Holocaust. The death of 6 million Jews was definitely a gruesome outcome. But if it were merely about the death count, then Stalin should surely be thought of as the greater evil. Yet, America had partnered with Joseph Stalin. If the evil of Hitler rested primarily in the number of people he killed, as well as his use of concentration camps, then Stalin would’ve blown Hitler away based on that metric. So, how was it possible that the West had teamed up with Stalin, someone statistically worse, and still retained its position as the good guys in this great war against evil?

We had also been told that Britain had entered the war because of Hitler’s invasion of Poland. If that were distinctly true, then why did we decide to give Poland over to the Soviet Union once the war concluded? That was a pretty substantial contradiction. The border of Poland couldn’t have been that important if we’d been willing to cede it to the communists when it was all said and done. But we’d been happy to force a global war because Poland’s border had been threatened?

For our whole lives, most of us had basically assumed that the Nazis must’ve been the most horrifying thing to ever happen. It had been beaten into us that this was the case. With how much time had passed, Gen Z now felt like we could view the Germans as fellow human beings. No one seemed to agree with us, but the cartoonish portrayal of Nazi Germany as the irredeemably evil empire from Star Wars was starting to look like pure propaganda. These were people, after all, not literal demons. The veneer around the Nazis had already started to fade a bit, even before Darryl had made his infamous statements.

Once we discovered that two of the most fundamental claims surrounding the war narrative were so obviously logically inconsistent, we were severely disoriented. So much of what we thought about the rest of history started to break down along with it. Our lens that we had once used to decipher good and evil had been cracked.

We didn’t know who or what we could trust. We did, however, know for certain that we were being lied to. Like before, we didn’t know to what extent, or to what end, but we knew.

**

The Last Dose  Gen Z had spent a decade being forged in the fires of chaos and insanity. Our journey had been full of broken promises, cowardice, betrayal, and the blackest of magic. Nevertheless, we’d withstood it all despite the failures of everyone we’d put our faith in.

It looked like we were totally alone in this new world that we’d been damned to. We thought we’d won with Trump’s return, but we were quickly realizing that it wasn’t going to be so simple. We continued to be deceived. There appeared to be one last road that we needed to venture down.

As we watched the magic protecting World War II start to falter, we knew that we were on the verge of a pivotal discovery. The metamorphosis was almost complete. But we didn’t have anyone that seemed capable of guiding us through this last doorway.

We didn’t know it, but the teacher who would complete our journey had actually been toiling in manufactured obscurity for a decade. He’d been waiting. In fact, he was even one of us. He was part of Gen Z.

Not many people in the general masses had heard the name Nicholas J. Fuentes before 2025. The gatekeepers of truth had successfully excluded him from the conversation, but they couldn’t do it forever.

In a suburb just outside of Chicago, Nick Fuentes grew up as a regular kid. He hailed from a typical middle-class, Catholic family. He didn’t have rich parents and his dad wasn’t some well-connected man. Despite his humble beginnings, Fuentes always had a deep pull toward the political realm.

Growing up, Nick had pretty much been a standard conservative. He was the classic Republican kid. He did all the things that an ambitious, precocious young man usually would. He was a member of the debate club, played in the school band, and his high school graduating class had even voted him “most likely to be future president.”

When Nick finished high school in 2016, he went on to study at Boston University. It was during his first year of college that Nick would make his initial entrance into politics.

During Trump’s presidential campaign, Fuentes had become well known on his college campus as the kid who wore a red MAGA hat wherever he went. His unapologetic support for Donald Trump predictably incited all the expected enemies. Nick was eventually asked to debate the student body president of Boston University over his support for Trump.

Fuentes, who basically held standard neo-conservative and libertarian views at the time, argued the typical talking points in the debate. When the topic of racial differences and outcomes came up, he commented that “it has nothing to do with race, everything to do with culture. Asia has taken our culture and done well for themselves. The Middle East? Not so much.” He was just a regular old conservative back then.

Although Nick’s performance wasn’t publicized in any meaningful mainstream way, it managed to grab the attention of some of the prominent right wing outlets that were trying to recruit the budding Gen Z youth. Nick was then befriended by a circle of right wing activists who had recognized his potential. Following the election in 2016, Fuentes was given a show on the Right Side Broadcasting Network. He decided to call it America First.

Though Nick didn’t have much of an audience, he kept at it. At only 18, Fuentes himself was still trying to figure out what he believed. Who can blame him? Great is the burden on the young shoulders of Gen Z.

Nick then started to challenge his own opinions. He dug into the fringe right wing ideology circulating across the internet — one of the few “free spaces” for uncensored questions and discussion in our present world. Over the course of his investigations, Nick noticed something about the mainstream conservative movement that he had just become part of. He recognized that a particular exception to the America First doctrine always got made for the State of Israel. This was repeatedly excused due to the fact that Israel was insisted to be America’s “greatest ally.” But that qualifier wasn’t a good enough reason on its own. Nick wanted to understand what exactly made Israel our greatest ally. Surely, there must’ve been a perfectly good reason for them to have received such a significant label and unrelenting preference.

As Nick continued to ask his new friends in the right wing sphere why Israel was the number one recipient of foreign aid, he was met with a peculiarly consistent response. His basic questions about the obvious double standard were immediately deflected and marked as antisemitic. Nick didn’t get it. He wasn’t antisemitic, he just wanted to know the reason why Israel was supposedly so valuable to America.

Trump had been extremely vocal in his criticisms of foreign aid during his 2016 campaign. So, why was everyone on Team Trump clamoring to support this foreign country? Why did no one have a real answer as to why this was our greatest ally? Why did we have politicians like Ted Cruz who explicitly said that he originally sought political power so that he could be the leading supporter of Israel?

Nick was now starting to have his eyes opened slightly, but he still didn’t really know what was going on. Fuentes then noticed a detail that gave him quite a bit more insight. During Netanyahu’s first visit to the United States with Donald Trump as President, Nick listened as Trump told Netanyahu to withhold the construction of further settlements in the West Bank. Rather than following the direction of the President, Benjamin Netanyahu returned to Israel and authorized the largest expansion of Israeli settlements in the region. Nick was confused as to how this foreign leader could so unabashedly disregard the President of the United States with such ease.

As Nick kept asking about the many narratives surrounding Israel, he continued to be met with smears and accusations of antisemitism. He stuck to his guns. He thought that this was the free marketplace of ideas. He expected a debate, not an iron curtain.

Due to Nick’s open investigation into the Israel question, hit pieces from all across the political spectrum started popping up. He was routinely called a “Jew hater” for asking about the exception that the American right made for Israel. After all, the movement he questioned was supposed to be prioritizing America over everything else, so what was the hang-up when it came to Israel?

Nick soon took to Twitter to voice his irritation about the Israel contradiction. He addressed his 1,000 followers with a tweet which explained that people should live in the country they are loyal to, Israel and Jews included.

Ben Shapiro, one of the most popular and established (and Jewish) voices in the conservative movement at the time, decided to quote-tweet Fuentes. Shapiro claimed that Nick was a blatant antisemite for suggesting that American Jews may be harboring loyalty to Israel. Fuentes was confused. Shapiro was openly pro-Israel.

Following Shapiro’s response, Nick was totally blackballed. He was unanimously blocked and cut off from each of the friends he thought he’d made since his debate. His shot at a writing gig at The Daily Wire was gone as quickly as it had come.

Fuentes was bewildered. He was an 18-year-old conservative trying to figure out what the right wing truly thought. He wasn’t an antisemite. He was merely trying to hold the conservative movement to its own stated principles. If conservatives were supposedly prioritizing America’s interests first, then somebody would need to explain how helping Israel genuinely benefitted America.

While everyone continued to ignore Nick’s questions, Fuentes looked more into the fundamentals of Israel. He noticed that Israel’s status as an expressly Jewish state should’ve been another contradiction of the broader Republican worldview. We were supposed to be indifferent to race. Group differences were technically not even supposed to exist, so why would it be okay to emphasize one particular ethnic difference and then positively define a nation by that metric? Wasn’t our colorblind approach the very thing which made us great? That was Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream, after all.

And yet, it seemed that many Jews didn’t really adhere to Dr. King’s vision. Their high degree of outward ethnic pride was something to be cherished, whereas a whiff of White identitarianism was condemned as the worst thing of all time, a direct line to Hitler and Nazism. Fuentes ultimately concluded that it should be perfectly fine for White people to be proud of their race just like everybody else gets to be. As a Catholic, he still held to the belief that every human had equal worth in the eyes of God. However, he also understood that this theological principle didn’t magically make the differences between the races go away.

Nick’s promotion of White identity would end up being the point that gave him his first taste of public infamy. Fuentes had actually been at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville during the summer of 2017. Just before the rally’s climactic end, Fuentes had posted to Facebook that a, “tidal wave of White identity is coming.” After his Facebook post had openly identified him as one of the evil racists at the event, Fuentes came under heavy fire.

Nick ended up having to leave Boston University due to the controversy and subsequent threats he started receiving after the protest. The fallout continued with his firing from Right Side Broadcasting. It looked like his hopes of becoming a mainstream conservative contributor were about dead.

As Fuentes was pushed further into the right wing underground, he leaned harder into his support for White people. The incredible amount of disdain he saw for Whites across the culture ultimately led him to look into some of the people who were pushing this hatred. Strangely, it seemed to be the case that many of the most vocal critics of White people were nearly always Jewish.

One particularly notable case of a Jewish person that publicly and excessively criticized Whites was Jon Stewart. Over the years, Stewart had constantly gone onto his wildly successful show to openly condemn and ridicule White people. He’d frame his tirade as being responsibly and bravely self-reflective. He would say things like “us White people” just before providing a bizarrely uncharitable assessment of White culture and behavior. Most people didn’t think twice about it. Jon looked White. To most Americans, he looked like a progressive liberal who was simply calling for more racial justice across society. Off the air though, Stewart would exclusively identify as a Jewish man, not a White man.

This was odd behavior. Even stranger, Nick learned that Stewart wasn’t Jon’s last name. Leibowitz was his original surname. Jon had been using the last name Stewart since the 1980s, apparently in an effort to hide his roots.

An enormous number of culturally prominent Jews had also changed their last names, consistently to a White, European surname. The Jews that chose to camouflage themselves behind a new last name were generally the most vocal critics of White people as well. Bob Dylan, born Robert Zimmerman, had also spent years denigrating White people during his time as one of the most famous musicians and cultural icons on the planet. Nobody seemed to notice that he wasn’t White. Because of the disguised identity of these men, all the vitriol spewed against Whites was pretty much excused entirely as self-critical reflections or self-denigrating humor.

Nick found out that these Jews didn’t consider themselves to be White despite what their outward portrayal suggested. Jews had regularly gone out of their way to clarify that they were not White. The Jerusalem Post once published an article titled, “Jews are not White: Race and identity in Israel and the US.” The American Jewish Committee posted on social media, “The lie that all Jews are White or came from Europe is one that has spread through anti-Israel protests around the country.” The Forward, a Jewish news site, released an article with the headline, “No, Ashkenazi Jews Are Not ‘Functionally White,” in which the author argued that Jews are in fact a distinct racial identity.

This wasn’t some fringe opinion that Fuentes had magically come up with. Jewish people didn’t hide the fact that they perceived themselves as completely separate from European Whites.

Once Nick saw that Jews viewed themselves as a distinct ethnicity, he realized how ridiculous it was that so many books attacking White people had been written by them. Last names like Berger, Cohen, Katz, and Applebaum dominated the discussion about the irredeemable evils of Whiteness. This denigration of one race by another obviously wouldn’t be allowed in any other context.

The amount of animosity toward Whites was gratuitous. Nick wanted to figure out what was causing so many Jews to dedicate their lives to bashing White people. Fuentes soon found out that this hatred of White Christians is doctrinally inherent to the Jewish religion. Jesus Christ is not, in fact, a respected figure in Jewish culture. The Jews view him as heretical. This opinion has also been codified in their Talmud. Judaism teaches that after Jesus Christ died, he descended into hell and has been boiling in human excrement ever since. This will supposedly continue for eternity.

Nick learned that this hatred for Christianity wasn’t merely a theological doctrine that could be disregarded. He found out that in Israel, Jews routinely spit on the Christians who go and visit the holy land. A large number of Christians are even physically assaulted during their stay in the Jewish nation. Israelis also refuse to use the additive plus sign in mathematics because of its similarity to the symbol of the cross. Instead, they use an inverted T-shape.

With these instances of obvious contempt for White Christians, Fuentes didn’t understand why so many people insisted that our society was founded on Judeo-Christian values. To be Jewish is to reject Christ, so how could these things be compatible? These two value systems sure looked to be fundamentally in conflict with each other.

The relationship between Judaism and Christianity was worse than incongruous, though. It looked like Jews were actively trying to damage White, Christian culture. There was hostility, not apathy. The most glaring incident of malice was the promotion of mass migration into Western countries. Jewish people appeared to be the most prominent advocates for White societies to be inundated with Third World migrants.

Growing up, we’d been trained to believe that America has always been this collection of different cultures from around the globe. We were taught that this was fundamental to Americanism. In actuality, this was never the case. The founders were quite explicit in their notations that America was a nation of and for White people. The Naturalization Act of 1790 explicitly reserved citizenship for “free White persons of good character.”

It wasn’t until the 1900s when we started to see a shift in the underlying premise of America’s founding principles surrounding race and immigration. The particular adjustment in the national sentiment on immigration started when Israel Zangwill, a Jewish man, came up with the term ‘melting pot’ to describe America around the beginning of the 20th century. Slowly but surely, the seeds grew out of that reframing, reaching the point that we became ubiquitously known as a nation of eclectic immigrants from around the globe.

As the narrative around immigration began to set into the minds of Americans, an enormous amount of powerful Jews started pushing hard for America to get flooded with immigrants. This went beyond rhetoric, though.

Rather than continuing to maintain the national origins quotas that used to prioritize immigrants from European countries, Emmanuel Celler, a Jewish man, decided to help introduce legislation in 1965 that would ultimately change the standard American immigration policy. The new policy abolished the old, supposedly racist quotas, and opened up America to massive waves of immigration from the third world.

The Hart-Celler Act facilitated the mass migration that brought the White population in America from around 90% in 1965 down to 58% in 2026. The shift in demographics over the last 60 years hasn’t been some organic transition. There was never a democratic vote to reduce the White population of America and replace it with Third Worlders. This had been done intentionally, without the consent of the governed.

While there’s never been broad calls for more diversity in Israel, a bizarre amount of Jews have oddly made it their life’s mission to fund immigration throughout the West. George Soros, a Jew from Hungary, has spent decades using his immense fortune to fund mass migration into the West through his Open Society Foundation.

There’s never been a genuine argument for why White, Christian countries should exclusively get dumped with an endless amount of people that don’t assimilate, don’t have any skills, and are usually a drain on our welfare system. None of this worked in theory. The only actual reasoning behind such import-migration would be to destroy the cultural and financial systems of the countries affected by it. This is no mere speculation: the Cloward-Piven strategy devised at Columbia University in 1966 explicitly expounds it.

It no longer looked like a coincidence that Alejandro Mayorkas had been so hell-bent on letting in as many invaders as possible into America during his time as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. It sure seemed like there were a lot of Jews that simply hated White society and wanted to see it destroyed by this form of migratory destruction.

Over the years, Fuentes observed prominent Jews loudly and proudly clap for this immigration into the West. There was a uniquely Jewish celebration of the demographic transformation of White cities. Bill Maher once said on his podcast: “London is now minority White. And I think that’s a victory to be celebrated. It’s a good thing. Diversity is our strength.” Why would this American Jew be happy that the English capital city of London is no longer predominantly English? Would this ever be acceptable to say about any other race or culture that isn’t ethnically White? Does Tel Aviv also need more African immigrants?

The amount of influence that Jews seemed to have over the migratory policy of the West was certainly eyebrow raising. Nick then tried to figure out how so many Jews managed to occupy these positions of power in the first place. There are about 10 million people in the nation of Israel, and Jews make up just about 2% of America.29  There were almost as many Jews in the United States as there were American Indians. However, while we’ve basically heard nothing from American Indians besides casinos and alcoholism, Jews somehow dominated nearly all of our cultural, political, and financial discourse.

While being only 0.2% of the world’s population, 10–20% of billionaires happen to be Jewish.30  Jews are also especially overrepresented in Congress and academia, two of the most influential spheres within our society. Many Jews have explained away their overrepresentation by insisting that they have higher IQs.

Even after granting the generally high IQ of Jews, Fuentes still couldn’t accept that explanation on its own. He discovered that while Jews are around 2,000% overrepresented across Ivy League admissions, their standardized test scores haven’t come close to constituting such an incredible disparity.31  Asians, who have performed similarly on tests and made up a larger segment of the American population, haven’t enjoyed the representation in the elite spheres of the United States anywhere close to what Jews have.

Thus, it looked to be that Jews were very obviously practicing extreme nepotism that helped facilitate their incredible overrepresentation. Given America’s alleged commitment to being a colorblind meritocracy, Nick didn’t understand why it was okay for Jews to be so overtly tribal.

Another area of Jewish overrepresentation that Nick noticed was in the media. With all the hit pieces written about him, Fuentes recognized a clear pattern in the last names of the authors. The Jewish prominence within the press wasn’t purely relegated to left-wing outlets, either. It looked like The New York Times was stacked with just as many Jews as The Daily Wire.

The claim that Jews had an unusually firm grasp over the media wasn’t some conspiracy. The disproportionate percentages of Jewish involvement in the press compared to their size was undeniable. The major media moguls throughout the last 100 years have pretty much all been Jewish.

Along with the press, Jews seemed to have an additional stranglehold on Hollywood. Some of the industry’s most important men like Harvey Weinstein, Sumner Redstone, Bob Iger, and Steven Spielberg, were Jews. The list goes on and on. In fact, in an article published in The LA Times titled, “Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon” the Jewish author proudly boasts about the Jewish dominance within the industry.

Sadly, Jewish control over Hollywood didn’t appear to be some benign coincidence. Nick couldn’t help but notice that Hollywood was an extremely consistent promoter of the most degenerate behaviors imaginable. Movies and television constantly propagated homosexuality, feminism, transgenderism, drug abuse, promiscuity, and typically denigrated traditional values wholesale. Hollywood consistently encouraged total debauchery that was directly opposed to Christian ethics.

The opposition to Christianity within Hollywood didn’t seem to really be a secret. It was blatant. When Mel Gibson, one of the most exceptionally based men around, first tried to make The Passion of the Christ, he couldn’t get any major Hollywood studios to fund it. He actually had to finance it himself, though it ended up being one of the most successful independent films of all time. The Hollywood executives wanted no part of that movie even though they knew it would’ve made them enormous amounts of money.

This hostility to Christianity wasn’t only isolated to a few Jewish men in Hollywood. Some of the most vigorous promoters of anti-Christian behavior in American culture also happened to be primarily Jewish.

Nick had discovered that the pornography “industry” has also been heavily dominated by Jews. Al Goldstein, a prominent Jewish pornographer, once had this to say: “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged.” The man they called the “Walt Disney of Porn” was a Jew named Reuben Sturman. The owner of Pornhub is a literal rabbi, and the majority stakeholder of OnlyFans is, unsurprisingly at this point, Jewish.

Along with pornography, Fuentes discovered that many Jews have routinely helped to push other destructive vices across Western society. Online gambling was practically founded solely by Jewish people, and the same goes for the legislation that made it legal in the United States. Jews then helped to bring it to the cultural forefront. Dave Portnoy, the owner of Barstool Sports, is probably the most notorious example of a Jewish man who has had no problem introducing people to this vice that destroys lives while he profits.

This stuff didn’t stop at culture, though. Fuentes realized that there was also a sinister hold on the financial system. Wall Street was almost completely run by Jews. The banks, as well as the other financial institutions that were so dead-set on maintaining our debt-based society through usury, were nearly exclusively led by Jews as well. Larry Fink, Bernie Madoff, Robert Kapito, Bill Ackman, Leon Black, and even the original, now deceased Lehman Brothers happened to be Jewish men.

The most pivotal levers of power across Western society looked to be totally dominated by Jews. Nick had come to the explicit conclusion that this power wasn’t being used in a positive or even apathetic manner. In fact, it looked a lot like it was being used to intentionally destroy White society. This pattern seemed to be more than just a coincidence. If most of the people in power behaving this way were albinos, I think it’d probably be safe to conclude that there might be something up with albinism. For some reason though, when it came to the Jews, there wasn’t any way to speak about this without being universally condemned and silenced. Raising any issues about their broad and collective behavior would immediately get you branded as a Nazi.

It was as Dave Chappelle had said, “If they’re Black, it’s a gang. If they’re Italian, it’s a mob. If they’re Jewish, it’s a coincidence… and you should never speak about it.”

Nick had been blackballed from the mainstream conservative movement for asking why so much foreign aid money was sent to Israel. The things he’d then gone on to uncover were looking to be about a million times more controversial. Nick had accidentally stumbled upon the most potent and final dose of the redpill. He was floored by what he’d learned.

As usual, these investigations only led to more dangerous questions about the liberal mirage.

16. Ye ‘24  Nick Fuentes had managed to discover an answer that explained at least some of what had been going on in White societies over the last 80 years. Unfortunately, this particular explanation was about as radioactive as anything could be. Still, it was undeniable that Jewish influence had contributed to many of the structural problems that Gen Z men had faced throughout their lives. The most devastating detail was that it looked like it had been done intentionally.

When Fuentes decided to bring his observations up on his show, YouTube did not take kindly to it. He continually faced repeated strikes for hate speech. His videos were constantly demonetized, and he was eventually suspended for the last time in 2020. By the time Nick received his permanent ban, he had accrued around 70,000 subscribers.

Though being kicked off of YouTube was a major blow to Nick’s momentum, the fanbase he’d built had proven themselves to be extremely loyal. These dedicated fans would become known as “Groypers.” The Groypers faithfully followed Nick in whatever direction he went. In this case, they followed him over to a site called DLive, where he kept on asking these universally unsavory questions.

Fuentes was very clear from the start of his investigations that he didn’t hate Jews. He has never condemned all Jews for their blood, and he never will. His Christian faith actively precludes that. Nick simply wanted to understand why Jews were permitted to behave in such a clannish manner, often in opposition to the interests of the White societies which they inhabited. He also wanted to figure out how and why they could move with such power and impunity.

The extreme double standard bothered Nick. It irritated Fuentes to watch men like Eric Weinstein, who had continually advocated for a colorblind world, go and flip off the Arch of Titus because of a millennia-long ethnic blood feud. Everybody seemed to be able to play identity politics, except for White people. Nick just wanted the rules of race to be fair in our society. Either everyone gets to play identity politics, or no one does.

No matter how Nick approached his investigations and observations, he continued to get called an antisemite. His questions were said to be reigniting the Hitlerian flame. Fuentes truly did not understand how his questions were what raised the concerns rather than the genuinely destructive behavior that he was pointing out.

Nick came to understand that Jewish people, along with the State of Israel, were protected by a magic veil. This forcefield appeared to derive its protective powers from the Holocaust narrative. Whenever Jews or Israel were publicly criticized, that criticism was immediately shot down by some of the most powerful voices throughout society. It was declared that any discussion of Jewish behavior would inevitably lead to another genocide. Thus, nobody would even listen to the substance of the arguments. Of course, absolutely nobody was calling for any sort of violence at all.

Nick, like everyone else since the middle of the previous century, had grown up being taught the Holocaust was the worst event to ever happen. This was an enforced opinion. We’d seen all the movies and learned all the history in public school. The Holocaust miraculously managed to be worse than American slavery and racism itself. It was the quintessential event whereby all of liberalism’s worst enemies converged into a singular, untouchable narrative. Fuentes found the relevancy of the entire claim odd. The Holocaust didn’t take place in America. It wasn’t committed by Americans, or against Americans. It also happened in another century. He took a step back and asked why this particular event carried so much weight within our culture.

Fuentes was able to detach from so much of the gravitational pull of the propaganda to the point he could take a clear, close look at the full World War II narrative. After piecing together everything he’d learned, Nick concluded that the Holocaust was continually being invoked to protect Jews from broad condemnation for their deliberate undermining of White American society. Of course, the crimes committed as part of the Holocaust were real, but there wasn’t a uniquely exceptional display of evil when compared to other atrocities. The Holocaust was obviously being used as a cudgel to smash any criticism of Jews and Israel.

Rather than dissecting every claim about World War II, Fuentes made a much more operative point on the matter. Nick posed two very simple questions to everyone paying homage to the Holocaust religion: Why is this still relevant to Americans in the 2020s? Why is it objectively the worst thing to happen in all of history, when many events supersede it in scale, suffering, and brutality?

These questions effortlessly bounced off the magic shield, but Nick didn’t care — even if his arguments wouldn’t be answered, that didn’t mean they weren’t valid. Nick’s main conclusion was essentially that he didn’t care about the Holocaust more than any of the other tragedies throughout history. Most importantly, he didn’t accept it as a valid argument for why White people weren’t allowed to have an in-group preference. He also didn’t think the Holocaust should be used to shield Jews from general criticism. That seemed like a fair enough stance.

Unsurprisingly, the perspective that Nick came to have on the Holocaust only expedited his banishment from mainstream conservatism. He was instantly blacklisted from CPAC and Turning Point USA events across the board. Instead of engaging with Fuentes’ arguments, establishment conservatives were doing all they could to shut him up.

Despite his ostracization from the mainstream conservative movement, Nick had remained loyal to Donald Trump through it all. Fuentes always held the belief that even if Trump couldn’t publicly support the dissident right, he appeared to harbor genuine sympathy for the cause.

Nick’s deeply-held faith in Donald Trump ultimately led him to show up at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021.

Following the infamous riot, a video of Fuentes with a bull horn, egging on the protesters had gone viral across social media. Nick was bombarded with aggressive scrutiny, specifically because it looked like he’d evaded legal consequences while so many others had their lives destroyed.

In the video, you could hear Nick saying, “Keep moving towards the Capitol. It appears we are taking the Capitol back from the police… Keep marching, and don’t relent, never relent… Break down the barriers and disregard the police. This Capitol belongs to us now.” Given the scope of the government’s crackdown on January 6th offenders, it seemed suspicious that Nick wasn’t already in solitary confinement.

With the apparent avoidance of criminal penalties, a narrative spread that Fuentes was actually an undercover federal agent. Many prominent conservatives claimed that since he wasn’t put in prison for his involvement in January 6th, then that proved he was secretly working with the authorities to help orchestrate the event.

The people pushing that narrative apparently missed the fact that Nick did not escape January 6th unscathed at all. As a result of Fuentes’ involvement, he had his bank account frozen for six months, he was put on a federal no-fly list for a year, and he was subpoenaed by Congress. Fuentes also testified under oath during his deposition that he’s never had any contact with federal law enforcement. If he was lying, he could be imprisoned for perjury. And yet, he has not been.

Fuentes didn’t trespass, he didn’t enter the Capitol building, he didn’t fight with cops or the media, he didn’t vandalize anything, and he wasn’t part of a militia. Even with all that being the case, Nick had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to pay for lawyers to defend himself. He had to do this while his assets were frozen and he couldn’t process online payments.

If Nick is a federal agent or psyop, then he is the product of the most convoluted, diabolical, and brilliant execution of an intelligence operation in history. If it is in fact true that Nick is a creation of the CIA, then we don’t stand a chance against these brilliant, evil people anyway, so we might as well call it a day then.

Following his public involvement in the Capitol riot, Nick was banned from the streaming site DLive. There was no other alternative for Fuentes to turn to after he was deplatformed from this obscure site.

Fuentes had been getting crushed by basically every single tech company for years. Among all the distasteful opinions he held, his opposition to Jewish power and influence caused the most severe consequences. However, the response he received had really proven his whole point. It sure didn’t seem to be a coincidence that so many of these companies were led by Jews.

After being banned from DLive, Nick tried to establish genuine autonomy for himself. He launched his own online platform in October of 2021, called Cozy.tv. As usual, his loyal followers — the rank-and-file of Gen Z — had no problem adjusting to the new platform.

Even by 2022, however, Nick Fuentes was still a rather unknown figure to the broader American public. The gatekeepers had done an incredible job of keeping him quiet. He’d managed to attain the title of “the most canceled man in America” within far right circles. Nick would then get his first taste of true celebrity when Kanye West, now known as Ye, decided to come out with vocal criticism of organized Jewry.

Nobody close to Ye’s level of fame had been willing to call powerful Jews out by name and in such a manner. If nothing else, the outburst played a pivotal role in shifting the acceptable discourse on the subject.

Ye’s infamous meltdown started with a characteristically disjointed tweet: “I’m a bit sleepy tonight but when I wake up I’m going death con 3 On JEWISH PEOPLE The funny thing is I actually can’t be Anti Semitic because black people are actually Jew also You guys have toyed with me and tried to black ball anyone whoever opposes your agenda.”

After his sudden awakening, Ye decided to pick up Fuentes as one of his new allies. Word about their relationship started bubbling up across right wing Twitter, but it sounded like a joke at first. It was not a joke. The world was about to get introduced to Nick Fuentes.

In November of 2022, Ye brought Fuentes along with him to a dinner with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Ye’s original reasoning for setting up the dinner was so he could ask Donald Trump to be his running mate in his own 2024 presidential campaign, Ye ‘24. Fuentes was going to assist in the campaign. The whole thing seemed so absurd that it felt like it had followed the logic of a dream. Predictably, the press went insane over the dinner.

While the average person wasn’t aware of what Fuentes was really about, the media knew exactly how they were going to frame him. Articles decrying the fact that Trump had eaten dinner with a “White-supremacist and Holocaust denier” flooded the internet. Right after the news broke, Jimmy Kimmel opened up his monologue and addressed millions of NPCs by saying, “A meeting of the mindless at Mar-a-Lago. We learned on Friday that Trump had dinner with Kanye West, and a White supremacist / Holocaust denier named Nick Fuentes.”

Luckily, Fuentes was used to the negative coverage at this point. He wasn’t bothered. Nevertheless, the media displayed an impressive level of coordination and persistence. In a word, they had received their marching orders. They were instructed to systematically destroy Nick and Ye’s reputations, and they did. There was, again, no refutation offered that tried to dispute the claims made by these two men. Ye’s challenging of Jewish power was dismissed as crazy, evil, and laughably untrue. There was a simple insistence that Ye had gone off the deep end, without anybody bothering to articulate why he was wrong.

We watched as all the things Ye had accused the Jews of doing in his original tirades were done to him once again. This time, it was far more outwardly effective.

Ye was crucified in the press. His social media accounts were suspended. Adidas, Gap, Balenciaga, Foot Locker, TJ Maxx, and Vogue cut ties with him and removed his signature gear from their shelves. He was dropped by his talent agency and even had his assets frozen. Chase bank notified him that they were terminating his bank account. This is the same bank that maintained Jeffrey Epstein’s accounts while knowing about his status as a sexual predator, by the way.

Ye’s access to his children was then threatened. Somehow, Harley Pasternak, a Jewish, personal trainer for celebrities, had a significant level of control over this part of Ye’s life. He sent Ye a text message which outlined some options for him to survive his newly found opposition to Jewish power:

I’m going to help you one of a couple ways… First, you and I sit down and have a loving and open conversation, but you don’t use cuss words, and everything that is discussed is based in fact, and not some crazy stuff that dumb friend of yours told you, or you saw in a tweet. Second option, I have you institutionalized again where they medicate the crap out of you, and you go back to Zombieland forever. Play date with the kids just won’t be the same.

After losing his bank account, his sponsorship deals, his social media, his children, and his reputation, it sure seemed like Ye’s claims about the power that Jews held in society were pretty accurate. In the face of such heavy backlash, Ye still stood strong and held onto his extremely unpopular perspective. He even went so far as to release a song that he called Heil Hitler, known more colloquially as “Nigga Heil Hitler.”

While nearly every protest song is typically focused on its message more than anything else, this tune was genuinely good enough on its own to become a number one hit. One can imagine that as soon as it started making the rounds on X, quite a few calls were made. A number one song praising Hitler couldn’t have been allowed. So, it was banned on all streaming platforms. Plenty of people noticed that you could freely sing about whatever other demonic and degenerate stuff that you’d like to, but not this particular topic.

Ye’s cancellation had actually managed to prove his point. There was no attempt to rebut Ye’s accusations. We instead saw a strategic, unilateral cancellation campaign that was merciless and effective. There was no other group in society that could muster 5% of this type of response. Criticizing Whites made you money. It helped your career! Where was this type of reaction for the people who openly demonized White people throughout society?

After the Ye debacle, Nick’s once seemingly outlandish claims about organized Jewish power were starting to appear fairly well-founded to anyone paying attention. The crackdown on Ye opened a lot of peoples’ eyes. So, Fuentes pushed his message harder.

Even with his tremendous consistency, Nick’s reach remained severely suppressed. It looked like the cancellation efforts had worked. Most people that knew about him were only familiar with terrible headlines and some extremely controversial clips from his show. However, after Rumble, an alternative to YouTube, came out with an unrelenting commitment to free speech, there was some hope that Fuentes might get a shot at finally reaching a broader audience. In early 2023, Nick decided to start uploading America First to Rumble.

Though Nick’s account initially dealt with a couple of suspensions, Rumble maintained its commitment to free speech even though so many prominent figures were calling for them to censor him. Rumble wasn’t willing to add Nick to the front of the search results, nor give him a partnership deal, but Nick’s access to the platform did help facilitate his ascension.

While many sites had previously banned the presence of Fuentes’ face from their platforms, things were beginning to change. Clips of his show had started popping up all over X following Elon’s purchase. People began to see Nick’s actual takes on their timelines, not just his least-palatable sarcastic jokes. Thankfully, most people on the right wing were familiar enough with Rumble to consider heading over and checking out Nick’s full, uncensored show. By mid-2023, Fuentes’ view counts were starting to rise dramatically.

Ye had jarringly injected the Jewish question into the public, but his approach had been a bit too presumptive to really shift public opinion. His cancellation had raised plenty of eyebrows, but the narrative needed something a bit more substantial to awaken NPC normies up to the premise of Jewish power. Surprisingly, Israel ended up doing that by itself. It was the Israeli response to the Hamas attack on October 7th that ultimately softened the barriers that had once indiscriminately shielded Jews from any criticism.

Following October 7th, the slaughtering in Gaza and the excessive destruction that Israel was inflicting became too much for people to ignore. Social media sites were inundated with this footage. People were horrified.

Israel had strategically chosen to market October 7th as the second worst thing to happen since the Holocaust. They had equated it to 9/11. They went so far as to say that the population comparison to the United States made it equivalent to something like 45 “9/11’s.” That claim didn’t land quite like they’d hoped.

It had become blatantly obvious that Israel’s framing of October 7th had been done in a way that would help justify their military response in Gaza. It was also being used to protect them from criticism. Any critiques of the Israeli government’s actions were smeared as antisemitic. But the atrocity propaganda of October 7th wasn’t working nearly as well as the Holocaust had.

After seeing Ben Shapiro get caught spewing a fake story about 40 babies being beheaded, it all got to be a little too absurd. It was beginning to sound an awful lot like what they’d said about soap and lampshades a long time ago.

The spell was breaking.

Israel’s militaristic response was getting to be too much even for its virulent supporters. Charlie Kirk, one of the right’s most famously devoted Israel lovers, was publicly asking if the Israeli government had issued a stand down order before the attack. There was starting to be some speculation that the Israeli government had wanted the attack to happen so that they could use it as a pretense to expand into Gaza.

Americans had always heard that Israeli aggression was distinctly retaliatory. The Israeli Defense Force was said to be the most moral army in the world. Their military actions were framed as purely defensive, and uniquely justified given the fact that they had to constantly maintain their ‘right to exist’. October 7th sincerely challenged that narrative.

We saw videos of gratuitous death and destruction wreaked by Israeli forces across Gaza, mostly upon the civilian population. Many innocent children were being killed indiscriminately. Even for many of those beholden to “our greatest ally,” that was not okay — not our values.

Despite the incriminating pictures and videos, Israel successfully managed to persuade many evangelical Christians that their military response was their sole option for action. For everyone else, that argument was not working. The Israelis seemed to relish in the destruction. They were glad to watch Gaza get leveled.

By now, many of us had learned about the Greater Israel project, which had the ultimate objective of expanding Israel’s borders further. Just as they’d been growing since their inception, they wanted to continue, not just into the West Bank, but also into Gaza.

We soon learned about the hostility that Israel openly expressed toward the Palestinians. Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said in regard to these people: “We are fighting against animals.” Netanyahu echoed that sentiment. There were even reports that some IDF soldiers had protested for the right to rape their Palestinian prisoners.

The rest of the world didn’t believe that the Palestinians were animals. In fact, the West mostly objected to what Israel was doing in Gaza. However, whenever detractors voiced their dissent, Israel apologists defiantly declared that the deaths weren’t necessarily good, but that every single death was exclusively the fault of Hamas.

Israel and its defenders apparently felt that the men who pulled the trigger on Palestinian children weren’t responsible for any of it because of what happened on October 7th. That wasn’t a good enough reason for pretty much anyone. These people didn’t get to wear a cloak of moral impunity that allowed them to kill whoever they wanted. A past tragedy didn’t excuse any and all forms of retaliation, nor did it unilaterally protect against criticism.

The slaughter in Gaza brought a significant amount of attention to the Israeli Defense Force as a whole. We were witnessing IDF soldiers shooting kids in the testicles and laughing about it, remarking that it was target practice. That didn’t sound like members of the most moral army around. That didn’t look like our “greatest ally” with whom we share civilizational values.

For a country that was so fearful of these animalistic terrorists, we were surprised to learn that Netanyahu and the Israeli government had actually funded Hamas. They had believed that the continual threat of a prominent, rabid terrorist group calling for the extermination of Jews would help Israel in the PR war. The activists who were demanding the establishment of a Palestinian state to be established would then have to explain or excuse these inconvenient terrorists.

While the Israeli government’s move to fund Hamas was strategically effective, it didn’t really support the narrative that they were defenseless victims who were being helplessly terrorized. People were certainly starting to notice what was going on here.

Word was also getting out that the IDF had a policy which they happened to call the “Hannibal Directive.” This operative rule insisted that it was better to kill Israeli citizens through friendly fire, so long as it meant that they wouldn’t be taken hostage and give up valuable secrets, or get used as political leverage. In fact, many Israeli civilians on October 7th were killed by Israeli soldiers.

More odd things regarding Israel and its military came to our attention in the bloody wake of October 2023, but nothing exemplified the Jewish supremacist mindset better than Israel’s “Samson Option.” This unofficial doctrine states that the Israeli military would choose to nuke the entire world if the country faced destruction. It draws its name from the biblical figure, Samson, who used his last burst of strength to pull apart the pillars of the temple he was in, collapsing it and killing everybody. Many Jewish commentators continue to see absolutely nothing wrong with this approach. Why does this small country, which has officially denied possessing nuclear weapons, have the right to blow up the world if it’s threatened?

The awakening that October 7th had brought to society was crucial in priming the public for what was about to come next. The cultural discourse had been heating up over Israel and the Jewish question. No one could deny that many prominent Jewish people had some degree of serious leverage over public discourse. Any critique of Israel and Jews openly resulted in silencing and cancellation. While the public was waking up to this, Nick Fuentes’ prominence was increasing alongside it all.

**

The nativist right loudly declared itself to be America First. Sadly, Trump chose the alternative.

Donald Trump turned away from his base with seemingly no shame at all. Ten years of loyal support had been disregarded. We were considered the bad guys for wanting to be a sovereign nation. We were also the bad guys for wanting the Epstein files to be released!

While the dissident right had their hopes crushed, Israel loved Trump’s new direction. They even awarded him the most prestigious award they could give, the Israel Prize. Through his heroically anti-American actions, Trump became Israel’s top goy.

Our interests had been discarded for a foreign country thousands of miles away. Everyone wanted the young men of America First to just go away. There was nowhere to turn to. Nothing made any sense.

Then, immediately following the bombing, a particular clip popped up on X. In the video, we saw a familiar looking man. All that many knew about this guy, Nick Fuentes, was that the press had sporadically smeared him as an evil, sexually repressed troll throughout the last decade. Most of us still didn’t know what Nick Fuentes was all about, even by mid-2025. We hadn’t actually heard what he had to say. But, this time, we gave him a real listen. We had absolutely nothing to lose.

The clip was from Nick’s show, America First, but it was from an episode that had aired around two years ago, right after the October 7th attack.

In the clip, we listened to what Nick had to say loud and clear:

Israel benefits from the attack by Hamas because now they get to solve the Gaza question finally. Now, they get to go in and kill them all and ethnically cleanse this region. In doing so, they know they’re provoking an unavoidable retaliation. There’s an unavoidable, reciprocal attack by these Iranian militias against Israel, and all that does is give Israel an excuse to do what they always wanted to do, which is to bomb Iran’s centrifuges, which is their nuclear program. And if they do that, then Iran is in a war with Israel, and then they draw the United States into a war with Iran. And they get the crown jewel, what they always wanted, which is an end to the regime in Syria and an end to the regime in Iran. That seems to be the big play that Israel is making.

Following October 7th, we had all watched the gratuitous slaughter in Gaza. We watched as Assad’s regime in Syria was toppled. Iran’s centrifuges had just been bombed, and America was now loudly calling for regime change in Iran. We were a bit stunned at the accuracy of Nick’s predictions. He must’ve known what he was talking about, at least to some degree. His calculations were far too precise to dismiss.

In the past, many of us had negligently believed the media slander about Nick. Most of us didn’t ever bother to take him seriously. That ended as soon as we saw that clip. At this point, we were all listening to what Nick Fuentes had to say.

The old footage of Nick Fuentes had been so striking for one specific reason: he was correct. After years of being told nonsense like how senile, decrepit old men were really at their intellectual peak, we had figured something out. We’d discovered that what makes somebody correct is not the amount of former CIA officers who sign off on some letter. Truth isn’t dependent on the number of experts that declare a certain thing to be true. What makes someone correct is the ability to accurately predict future events and diagnose their causes. Predictive power is what proves that the model being used for forecasting is indeed rooted in truth.

Fuentes’ predictions following October 7th showed us that his political model must be based in truth, purely because of its accuracy. But how was this the case? How did this guy in his mid-twenties have a political model that allowed him to know things that the experts and the supposedly renegade intellectuals didn’t?

We learned that Nick Fuentes had such a ruthlessly accurate political model because, above all, he didn’t care about how his statements would be received by the powers-that-be. He didn’t care about having to integrate the uncomfortable realities that so many others decided to omit from their models. He wasn’t captured by ideology or conformity.

Nick was one of the only political commentators doing genuine political science. He was focused on an accurate diagnosis. He didn’t worry about where the road led to, so long as truth was what guided him. Almost nobody could say the same.

The reason that Nick understood what was going on in Israel was the same reason that he understood the problem of race in America. It was the same reason that he could identify the issues that feminism was causing. It’s why he didn’t go along with the madness of BLM and the coronavirus during 2020. It’s why he stood up for the stolen election. It was why he wanted America to remain a White country.

It didn’t matter how unattractive the truth was, Nick would include it in his model. He rejected beautiful lies, even when the truth was uglier than anyone could stomach.

Rather than keeping these distasteful realizations to himself, Nick had the courage to announce exactly what he was seeing to anyone who would listen. He had also been uniquely willing to call out the head of the snake. Fuentes unapologetically explained that Jewish power was in fact playing a significant role in the nonsense happening throughout the West. He did this, not out of a hatred of Jews, but because that is where the pursuit of truth had led him.

Perhaps the most crucial detail to take note of here is that Nick hasn’t ever been happy about the conclusions he’s come to. He hasn’t been trying to prove himself correct. In fact, he has actively been trying to prove himself wrong. This is probably the single most important distinction that separates the far right from everybody else: we do not argue for a world that ought to be; we understand and accept the world as it is, and then we adjust our models accordingly. We are not utopian. And if you believe we’re wrong, we want you to tell us why. We’d actually love to be incorrect about our conclusions. Because the reality we face is grim.

Ever since Nick originally entered the political realm, he had been waiting for somebody to come and explain to him where he’d gone wrong. The issue was that nobody was able to. Nobody was even willing to debate him. Instead, he became the most canceled man in America.

So then, how and why did the most canceled man in the country manage to become so beloved by the young men of Gen Z?

The answer is very simple. Despite whatever the media has tried to tell you, we have come to like Nick Fuentes most fundamentally because he is consistently correct. It’s not about rebellion, humor, or edginess. Nick just seems to be the one person brave enough to accurately tell the uncensored truth.

For a decade, we have watched as man after man has buckled under the pressures of the matrix. Nick looks to be one of the only men alive who simply refuses to cower to the forces of the liberal order. Even in the face of death, Fuentes has continued to preach what he believes to be true.

Following the bombing of Iran, the world was finally forced to reckon with Nick Fuentes. Despite 10 years of coordinated suppression, Nick has persisted. He has never folded. Now everybody has been compelled to learn his name and hear what he has to say. Nick Fuentes is on a generational run.

All the former voices that had either ignored or condemned him welcomed him with open arms, as if they’d just stumbled upon him. Nobody bothered to address the fact that they’d all banned him or disregarded him for a decade. Everyone appeared to be in agreement on one thing: Nick had enormous talent. And that, for the powers-that-be, is a problem.

The newfound celebrity status hasn’t changed the media’s opinion of Nick. He remains a total pariah. As Nick has risen in popularity, he has routinely been blamed as the sole catalyst for the radicalization of the men of Gen Z. Everyone insists that we’ve all fallen under the spell of this evil con-man, who has supposedly turned us into crazy, cruel racists and antisemites.

But everybody in Gen Z knows that this is absolute nonsense. The truth is that, by the summer of 2025, we’d merely caught up to Nick.

We had spent the last 10 years traveling the very same road that Nick Fuentes had already been down. By the time we were introduced to Fuentes, he was able to put the pieces of the puzzle together for us. He had the depth of knowledge to give our broad observations the context we needed to make proper sense of everything.

Nick Fuentes never redpilled American Gen Z men. Actually, Nick didn’t have to redpill us. The lies of liberalism did that by itself.

American History Z

Joey Oliver