Dhamma

Sunday, April 12, 2026

Hawking Isn't Talking


Isn’t it weird that E=mc² is the most widely recognised physics equation in the world? And yet it is literally of no use to anybody. This is the power of physics propaganda. Most people can’t convert miles to kilometres, but they sure know all about E=mc²!

Everyone knows about Albert Einstein, he’s the greatest genius who ever lived, right? Followed by Stephen Hawking, of course! You can’t argue with that, they are the two most brilliant minds in the entire history of the human intellect ever, their contributions are greater and more significant than all the other achievements of all lesser mortals combined! They are truly GODS AMONG MEN!!

Seriously though, you have to wonder why these two odd fellows are given such pride of place in the pantheon of academic idols. I used to admire them myself, but as I’ve alluded to previously, I was a naive young fool, an idealist.
The fact is, when you no longer worship atoms and gravity as your personal lord and saviour, and you’re no longer awe-struck by academic laurels, waffly explanations or synthesised speech, you start to see more clearly what is right in front of your face.

In the cold light of day, it is plain to see that neither Einstein nor Hawking achieved anything meaningful by tinkering with their tensors, it was all pure vanity, indulgent mathematical conjecture, mental gymnastics and CGI razzamatazz. Relativity is not reality, and absolute truth exists absolutely. Gravity and/or ‘bendy-space-time’ are not found in nature, they are mathematical models with no useful application in the real world, and this is what Stephen Hawking devoted himself to.

In 1963 at the age of 21 he was diagnosed with terminal ALS and given only 24 months to live, yet somehow he managed to press on for 55 more years. People with ALS (a.k.a Lou Gehrigs or Motor Neuron’s disease) only live 3-5 years max, he outlived them all by more than 10x. That is quite an achievement, something was surely working for him, he looked healthier and more plump in 2016 than he did in the 1970s, and he somehow developed golden blonde hair and grew a new set of teeth in his old age (despite being unable to eat solids since the 70s).

Now before I get accused of distasteful humour or ‘ableism’, it’s important to understand the reason for my sarcasm. It has come to light in recent years that the Stephen Hawking ‘phenomenon’ is actually something quite sinister and disturbing, so I’m using bits of humour to relieve the tension, otherwise it would be too depressing.

I am not the first to say it, and I won’t be the last, there have been several presentations about it online (banned from youtube of course, but search Bitchute or Odyssey), and even some coverage in the mainstream media‘. Most recently (2024) there were some bizarre revelations regarding his appearance on Epstein Island, so there’s a LOT of things about Hawking that just don’t add up.

The charge against him is that the man we see in the wheelchair is in fact not a scientific genius but merely a puppet, a stooge that gets wheeled out by the establishment to give intellectual credibility to political agendas. He is not the one programming the words on the computer, the voice is scripted by hidden hands, crafted behind the scenes then attributed to Hawking via the speaker on his wheelchair. We are expected to believe Hawking did all his greatest work by twitching the inside of his cheek in binary code to program a speech synthesiser with the words he wishes to say. Try to imagine that! Theoretical physics is hard enough when you have the ability to write and draw and communicate, how much more challenging must it be while in a state of total physical and verbal paralysis, limited to using 1s and 0s? The only conclusion, he must be a super-genius, right!?

Though severely disadvantaged, Stephen Hawking did have one big advantage over everybody else in the world; he can say anything, and nobody can challenge him. Nobody can argue with a mute in a wheelchair, it’s just not fair play, it would be cruel and ‘ableist’ to rebuke him, plus you'd be waiting forever on him to program responses with his cheek muscle.

But, can he even really do that? I used to wonder why we never saw him in live debate or conversation with people, but it makes sense now, all the words emanating from the computer voice are pre-programmed, he can’t come up with real-time responses on the fly, that would be crazy. At best he can select phrases from a preset list.

But does he even do that? How much input does he really have on the words that come out the machine? We have all witnessed him sat there with that gummy smile while the synthesised speech buzzes out science words, we may even have seen him twitching a joystick with his wrist a few times, but we've never seen him actually communicate.

Nevertheless, his extreme disability status gives him virtually unlimited credibility in academia and on the world stage. In the inverted realm of legacy media, it’s all about the victim, the more of a victim someone is, the more exalted they are. Stephen Hawking is the undisputed champion of the victim olympics.

We are told he was the greatest physicist in the world at just age 19, and experienced a lengthy decline in bodily functionality throughout the 60s and 70s and had to give up lecturing, but his mind remained sharp and his determination to uncover the secrets of black-holes was unwavering. However, something happened in 1985 that changed his life forever.

While at a conference in Geneva hosted by CERN, he fell ill with pneumonia and was rushed to hospital, put on a ventilator and given a tracheotomy which destroyed his throat rendering him unable to vocalise even the most basic groaning sounds (which he had been using to communicate through the 70s). Allegedly then he was shuffled off back to England to be managed by a team of professional carers.
A year later he emerged, reborn, like a phoenix from the flames, equipped with a highly advanced (for the time) custom voice computer and wheelchair, and in 1988 published his seminal work ‘A Brief History of Time’, the most successful and unmemorable pop-science book ever.

He then went on to be a celebrity science idol for the next 30 years, appearing in a myriad of TV shows, movies, adverts, pop songs and concerts, as well as touring universities lecturing, even going up in a “zero-g” vomit-comet aircraft in 2007 to experience weightlessness. For someone who can’t physically move or talk, he’s a serious ‘mover and shaker’, a super hero on wheels, he gets around!

He’s also a bit of a ladies man, and has been accused of fondling handlers and seducing nurses with his charming banter. His condition did not hold him back sexually, he got married and supposedly produced three children in the years after his crippling disability kicked in (try not to think about that too much), then in 1995 got divorced and hooked up with one of his carers, someone named Elaine Mason.

Now I don’t like to judge by appearances, but Elaine Mason is a very suspicious looking individual who comes with a very suspicious back story.

Elaine, as the story goes, was previously married to David Mason, the engineer who developed Hawking’s voice box. Think about that for a second; she divorced from a successful able-bodied engineer who can speak, and married a paralysed mute in a wheelchair who relies on her ex-husbands technology to talk! Before that she was just a humble nurse at an orphanage in Bangladesh, helping poor children out of the kindness of her heart.

After his divorce was completed in 1995, Stephen wasted no time getting right back in the game, Elaine had been one of his nurses/handlers for quite some time, so she was well familiar with his ... proclivities.

Though this was during the peak of his celebrity career, their relationship was reportedly strained, mired by rumours of abuse and cruelty, and only lasted until 2006, at which point “Elaine” dropped off the face of the earth, never to be seen again, probably back caring for the poor orphaned kids in Bangladesh.

Curiously, all the tabloids put out stories around the same time with headlines like “All you need to know about Elaine Mason”, where they lay out the whole list of sanitised, government-approved factoids. The spell being cast in those articles is clear; there is nothing more to know about her than what we tell you.

If I were a gambling man, I'd be willing to bet my bottom dollar that Elaine Mason is an undercover agent, a military man in a ginger wig, possibly even a ‘catch & release’ criminal; serial liars like this have a very distinctive face that becomes easy to spot as you get wiser, plus you have to be seriously lacking in morals or under huge amounts of blackmail pressure to pull off a stunt like that.

The more you look, the more it starts to seem like the people surrounding Hawking are impostors and agents, bad actors playing a role in some twisted secret narrative, using him like a prop or a ‘cash cow’, a way to advance their careers and fill their pockets.

His alleged sprogs, Timothy and Lucy Hawking, are also quite suspicious, they have done the rounds on all the UK breakfast shows, tabloids and magazines, retelling their fond childhood memories about how he was the greatest dad ever, and cashing in on all the book sales and royalties of course. It must be said, they bear no similarity to Stephen at all, he was not exactly a handsome man but he had very distinctive primate-like features which did not seem to pass on to his children (lucky for them).

There is some video of Hawking “actually talking” prior to his accident, but I warn you, it is disturbing to watch, he is just groaning incomprehensibly, with nothing even close to words coming out of his mouth. Yet his trusty “interpreter” dutifully translates it all into perfect English “he says that no light can escape from the gravitational pull of a black hole” etc. It’s a very ballsy charade and I will admit, I fell for it, I was an ignorant fool for ever believing this man was a genius. When dealing with long-term media narratives like this, where information is based solely on testimonies of actors and compromised people, or something that was once uttered by a computerised voice machine, it can be hard to know what is true or genuine. However, when all the tabloids and breakfast shows are telling you the exact same list of ‘facts’, we know for sure it must be bought and paid for, a total fabrication.

Perhaps the most bizarre twist in the life of this “tortured genius” was his association with the Jeffery Epstein Mossad honey-trap operation, there are several pictures that have emerged with him on the island hanging out with some very unsavoury characters. It turns out Jeffrey Epstein was a big supporter of scientism, he branded himself as a ‘science philanthropist’, among other things. In 2012 he financed a conference in the US virgin islands’, with 21 of the worlds “top physicists”, including Hawking and his able-bodied Canadian counterpart Lawrence Krauss, and 3 Nobel laureates, with the purpose to “define gravity” (but wasn’t it defined 350 years ago?).

In January 2024 there was a large publication of files relating to the Epstein case, including transcripts of a conversation where it is claimed that one of Hawking’s proclivities involved ‘watching naked midgets try to solve complex equations on a blackboard too high up’. Of course this is pure gossip, information that could be easily fabricated, and actually totally ludicrous the more you think about it. There’s no way to know if he really said or consented to anything at all.

Understand that it can’t be determined whether Hawking was ever even sentient, whether he wrote any of the books or said any of the things attributed to him. There is no evidence that he was capable of communicating his ‘proclivities’ to anyone, in fact it is absurd to even think of a man in that position as having ‘proclivities’ and going to a sex island to partake in orgies etc, it’s pure mockery.

Quite possibly he has been inserted into the Epstein narrative to distract from the other living men and women who are implicated in it, or he was just brought out to the conference for ‘shits and giggles’. Epstein is said to have specially modified his personal submarine for Hawking’s arrival.

It’s entirely possible that the figure in the wheelchair was in some cases not even a living man, but due to the extremely limited degree of bodily movement on display, it could have been animatronics. It appears there were several different ‘models’ of Hawking used over the years, maybe 3-4 different versions of the body in the chair. People note the changing hair colour (from black to grey to golden blonde), weird teeth developments, ear size, nose shape, skin quality and so on.

The prevailing theory is that the ‘real’ Stephen Hawking died during the Geneva incident in 1985, and what emerged after that was some kind of Frankenstein’s monster, a state-controlled bionic boffin, the Robocop of Physics (curiously Robocop was released right around the same time).

A Brief History of Time was likely written by a team of ghost writers, it’s very waffly, and his computer speech would be programmed by whomever happens to be ‘using’ him at that time. This was evident in the later years as he began spouting globalist rhetoric and pushing political agendas, appearing in ever more bizarre places like Star Trek, Stargate, The Simpsons and Futurama. But his core message and philosophy was always essentially the same; there is no god, aliens are real, the planet is going to die from climate change and gravity will suck us all into a black hole.

We may never know exactly what happened with him, or who Elaine Mason really is, or whether Timothy and Lucy are really his children (his first wife Jane was admittedly having affairs), but we can be sure of two things; he made no fruitful contributions to science, and the official story of his life is a charade, a mockery.

It is a mockery of the idolatry of scientism, since the idolaters are essentially worshiping a ‘retard’ whom they believe is a genius, but he has no more capability than a vegetable. Its a mockery that shows how unscientific and gullible the majority of scientism believers are, and as someone who was very much involved in that world, I feel it deeply, it’s a cruel mockery but it perfectly illustrates the folly of idol worship.

I used to think Erwin Schrédinger was an idol, because of his legendary quantum wave equation and the infamous cat paradox, I even quoted him and used his image in presentations, then I found out he was a rampant pedophile! It would have been good to know that first, before quoting his work and associating myself with him, but the world is an inverted place, and it seems academia is generally unconcerned with morality these days.

It’s notable that the word ‘hawking’ means ‘selling in a public place by calling out to people’, as in merchants hawking their wares, or media hawking their narratives, or scientists hawking their theories.

If, as I suspect, this whole thing is a mockery, then the deceivers might have left a few little ‘easter eggs’ or clues for inquisitive truth seekers such as ourselves. Well, get this; it just so happens that Stephen Hawking died on March 14th 2018, also known as ‘Pi day’ (3.14), a poignant date for physics geeks, which also happens to be ...Einsteins birthday!

And if that weren’t unbelievable enough, we’re told that his friends at school used to call him by the nick name...Einstein’.

Of course, we’re expected to believe that this all happened by sheer coincidence on the edge of a giant spinning ball of atoms in an uncreated universe devoid of meaning and intelligent design!

To the discerning eye it is quite evident that the story of Stephen Hawking is a fabrication, and a profitable one too. There was never any real physics being done, nobody will ever use one of Hawking’s equations to solve any problems, it’s all complete gobbledegook designed to make gravity seem like this super complex thing that only the most tortured boffins can comprehend.

But actually it’s not so complicated, the plain truth is very simple to understand; gravity does not exist in nature, never has, never will, it has no place in true science and should be banished from our vocabulary altogether.

Hawking is to Einstein as Einstein is to Newton, they are the ‘gatekeepers of gravity’, nothing can be said about gravity without invoking them. They are gravity, and this is why they are held up above all other men of history, because without gravity, the Copernican model of the spinning globe earth and the Heliocentric solar system fall apart, along with the entire field of astrophysics and the whole state-sanctioned history of the universe; the big bang, the explanations of stars and galaxies, the planetary globe model, and even the theory of evolution - all of it collapses like a house of cards.

Steven A. Young
Science Conspiracies & The Secret Art of Alchemy

No comments:

Post a Comment