The negative consequences of sexualizing children

It is a masterpiece of the cultural revolutionaries to remove society’s value system from school sex education without arousing any noteworthy resistance. This requires sophisticated manipulation techniques. These include:

• Presenting themselves to the adult world as “scientific experts.”
• Presenting themselves to the young as competent, understanding friends and advocates against strict, unsympathetic parents.
• Adapting the language to youth jargon and the graphics to kids’ comics.
• Representing permissive sexuality as mainstream: “That’s normal!”
• Simulating peer pressure: “Everybody does it!”
• Not mentioning marriage or family .
• Representing deficient forms of the family—single-parent families, patchwork families, LGBT families—as equal to traditional (mother-father-children) families.
• Destroying the sense of shame by:

–Fiddling with plastic penises, plush vaginas, and condoms.
–Detailed representation of sexual behavior in words, images, movies and videos.
–Forced verbalization of sex acts in the classroom.
–Sexually-oriented role plays and physical exercises.
–Peer education: training and use of teenagers for sex education of other teenagers.*
 –Tying teenagers’ sex drive to the cultural-revolutionary goals of the adult sex educators by constantly stimulating children’s and teenagers’ sex drive.

The great risks of early sexual activity are widely known, even to the public authorities who promote early sexualization of children and teenagers. These risks include:

• Teen pregnancy and abortion.
• Health damage from contraceptives.
• Infection with sexual diseases.
• Psychological injury that can lead to depression and suicide.
• Lower achievement.
• Weakened ability to bond.

...

Is it really necessary to have 8 -, 9 -, and 10 -year-old children practice pulling a condom over a plastic penis in class? One would think that a teenager who can work a cellphone could handle a condom without academic guidance, if the need arose, but this is about something much different. What does a girl or boy actually learn in the process? A child who is not sexualized early has a natural sense of shame that protects him or her from sexual intrusions and activities. The limits set by this natural sense of shame are normally exceeded only in an intimate, loving relationship where the partner’s dignity is respected. Intimacy means no one but the lover is present. Manipulating plastic sex organs and condoms in a  mixed class, coercion to talk about sex acts, and exposure to graphic material damage the sense of shame. A teacher’s abuse of authority and peer pressure from the class are hard for a child to evade. Children assume that teachers are role models who are imparting necessary information to them. So they conclude: school is getting me ready for sexual intercourse, so it is normal to have it at the first opportunity. “Everybody does it.”

...

Who Gains?

The negative consequences of sexualizing children and teenagers are not “side effects” to be taken for granted while achieving positive goals. On the plus side for sexualization, there is nothing but the false promise of gratification and pleasure. From that, one might conclude that these effects are the real objective.

So who benefits from sexualization of children and teenagers and from their “diversity” education? Several players come to mind:

• Those who want to produce rootless people who can be manipulated for global strategic purposes.
• Those who have an interest in reducing global population growth without changing global distribution of wealth.
• Those who have an interest in seeing the Western nations sink into a “demographic winter.”
• Those who have an interest in eliminating religion, especially Christianity.
• Those who suffer under “heterosexual normativity” and wish to gain recognition through its dissolution.

Everything described in this chapter has happened because it was concealed by a cloak of silence. It is as if an alligator crawled into a child’s bedroom and nobody wants to look at it. Looking away is the easy way. However, people will no longer look away from the sufferings of ruined families once the state can no longer buffer the unpleasant consequences. Accordingly, here is a series of unpleasant questions for all parents and for all those who hope to become parents:

• Do you want your kindergarten children encouraged to masturbate and engage in sex play?
• Do you want your children, in all grades from elementary school on, to be familiarized with contraception methods and all types of sexual practices? Do you want their sense of shame destroyed?
• Do you want your children to consider every “sexual orientation” equal?
• Do you want your son or daughter to be encouraged toward homosexuality in school—and for the risks to be concealed?
• Do you want your children to have their own “rights” that strip your parental authority?
• Do you want your children to grow up without ethical standards or belief in God?

Normative deregulation of sexuality through sexualization and destabilization of children’s and teenagers’ gender identity undermines the family as the basic unit of society, injures children and teens, and contributes to further reduction of the birth rate. They serve the interests of tiny minorities and not the public good.

*Pro Familia trains students as young as 15 years old as “peer educators” or “sexperts,” who then hold sex education classes in school on their own. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung: Peer Education—A Manual for Practitioners, Order No. 13300721 . International Network: Youth Peer Education Network (Y-Peer): www.youth-peer.org/ (accessed October 7 , 2015 ).


Gabriele Kuby
The Global Sexual Revolution: The Destruction of Freedom in the Name of Freedom