To be is to be contingent: nothing of which it can be said that "it is" can be alone and independent. But being is a member of paticca-samuppada as arising which contains ignorance. Being is only invertible by ignorance.

Destruction of ignorance destroys the illusion of being. When ignorance is no more, than consciousness no longer can attribute being (pahoti) at all. But that is not all for when consciousness is predicated of one who has no ignorance than it is no more indicatable (as it was indicated in M Sutta 22)

Nanamoli Thera
Showing posts with label Weimar Germany. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weimar Germany. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2026

Weimar Germany vs Weimerica (bad vs worse)

 

Introducing "Esoteric 1933-ism

"Weimerica" is a term often used to describe the state of moral and spiritual degradation that has overwhelmed much of the West in recent years, with the United States being the undisputed leader of the Western world and the originator of its most nefarious and degenerate trends.

The referent to which it alludes is of course the Weimar Republic, a period in Germany which began after the catastrophic defeat of World War I in 1918, and remained in effect for 15 years, until it was brought to an end by the appointment of Adolf Hitler to the position of Chancellor in 1933.

The Weimar era was notorious for many things in Germany: economic upheaval, political instability, and a general collective psychic disruption due to living in the shadow of the catastrophe of the Great War. But the quality most often connotatively associated with Weimar is the onslaught of decadence.

Prior to the war, Germany was a staunchly conservative constitutional monarchy, which strictly held any public displays of impropriety in check. But after the chaos of late 1918 following the Kaiser’s abdication, the nation’s leadership was forced to sign the November armistice. That opened the floodgates: in the months and years to come, Germany was racked by chaos, turmoil, hyperinflation, and the sporadic sputter of attempted leftist revolutions. As a result, social mores were rapidly relaxed, and the results were often shocking, even horrifying.

Berlin proved to be the epicenter of much disreputable activity, which included but was not limited to the public flaunting of homosexuality, transgenderism, child prostitution, orgies, abortion, and other behaviors which had been forbidden just a few years prior. The nightclub culture of the period-- depicted so memorably in the 1966 Broadway musical "Cabaret" (later made into a movie in 1972)-- specialized in risque and ribald songs and dance numbers, which often openly celebrated aberrant sexuality.

Though some found the new openness “liberating,” it is fair to say that most Germans were not happy with this cultural shift. Yet, as with “wokeness” today, the bitter fruits of this largely unpopular societal transformation proved difficult to root out.

But what could one do? Times had changed. The war had been lost, Wilhelm II had slunk away into exile, his monarchy in ruins, the Versailles treaty had imposed humiliating restrictions on the German population, and a parliamentary democracy-- which nobody had really asked for-- had been installed. Tradition had been flung to the winds, but by whom, exactly, and to what end?

Germans largely felt, during this period, that their nation had been forced into a new phase by forces beyond their control. Changes had been imposed from above, not due to any settled consensus, and certainly not by "the consent of the governed."

***************************

Today in the West, we are faced with a similar situation. There is a sense of things spinning out of control, of our being ruled by unseen and largely unacknowledged forces who seem bound and determined to architect the degeneration of our societies. We are solemnly instructed to count ourselves fortunate not to live under despotic regimes like those that rule China or Russia, where human rights are not safeguarded as they are under Western "democracy," but this line, however superficially persuasive, quickly loses its flavor like chewed up bubblegum when one considers the disingenuousness of the sentiment.

It is true that the West has long enjoyed a higher standard of living than other parts of the world, and for the most part the rule of law obtains— insofar as late-night knocks on the door from the Stasi and coerced visits to the torture chambers of the Lubyanka, after you were overheard speaking ill of Party Comrade X whilst taking a cigarette break at the factory— don't generally happen here.

But an insidious "soft" totalitarianism (sometimes called "polite totalitarianism," though I resist this designation since I since nothing "polite" about it whatsoever) increasingly obtains in the West, whereby not conspicuously toeing the party line of the mandatory ruling ideology leads to the ruination of one's life, through the machinations of "soft" Stasi-like agents such as Human Resources commissars sniffing out objectionable internet content while antifa-affiliated "doxx" the addresses and job positions of intellectual deviants (and their family members). Before one knows it, one's use of Constitutionally-mandated freedom of speech to advance causes deemed “wrong” makes one effectively unhirable, and in some cases, deprived of a bank account.

It is true that dissidents in despotically-inclined non-Western countries generally have a harder time when it comes to facing imprisonment, torture, and other hardships from the state, but it is a sheer farce today to claim that Western countries' rulership work to protect their citizens' ostensible "human rights." As recent events have shown, it now not unusual for UK citizens to face jail time for posting "improper" tweets, and such brazen violations of free speech are the rule, NOT the exception, in Western countries today (the United States still remaining more "classically liberal" in at least this respect).

What is more, citizens of Western countries, which are, ostensibly "democracies," find themselves nevertheless constrained from being able to see their societal preferences met, if those preferences are trumped by the demands of oligarchic bodies, which wield inordinate power and seemingly cannot be vetoed, no matter how thoroughly disliked their edicts are.

The most glaring instance of this is the insistence of mass immigration, which, in tandem with an altogether apathetic disregard for the importance of border security, shows the contempt with which corporate and bureaucratic “elites” regard the well-being of the legitimate citizens of Western nations. It is considered “in bad taste” to draw attention to violence committed by illegal immigrants, and frowned on as “xenophobic” to emphasize the importance of protecting the border. But despite the best efforts of “nudge units” attempting to make people feel like reprobates for having common-sense perspectives regarding immigration (legal and illegal alike), a large number of the population still remain favorable to radical steps being taken to remove the “undocumented” population from the nation.

Even the Weimar authorities did not impose large numbers of cultural alien populations upon the Germans in the 1920s or early 30s. But those same authorities seemed unwilling to put a stop to the dismaying rise of cultural degeneracy spoken of above, a trend which tracks with Weimar going into effect in the first place and can be identified as one of its many disagreeable traits.

The conspicuous degeneracy of late-stage “Weimerica” is, of course, several times worse than that of Weimar Germany. There was nothing happening in Berlin that resembled “drag queen story hour,” nor did the Weimar period feature an actual campaign by establishment-affiliated medical professionals to convince parents to inject their children with hormones and mutilate their genitals, nor was it ever insisted that men pretending to be men should have access to women’s sports/spaces. Such contemporary outrages are, moreover, propped up by the corporate and bureaucratic establishment, who give billions of dollars to further these moral atrocities.

****************************************

Still, the parallels between Weimar and Weimarica are compelling enough to cause a person of traditional or simply “normal” beliefs and perspectives to earnestly wish for a “1933” moment, wherein an end is brought to all of this prevalent filth, and decency is finally restored. Whatever one thinks of Hitler or the National Socialist movement, they are at least to be credited for the decisive steps they took in 1933 to put a stop to Weimar forever.

May our own “1933” come soon!

Andy Nowicki is the author of several books, most recently The Insurrectionist, Muze, and Love and Hidden Agendas, as well as the just-published The Rule of Wrath.

https://substack.com/@andynowicki


Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Nothing new:society sunk into depravity comparable to the mythic Sodom and Gomorra

Goethe was the basis of Spengler’s historical method. He is cited throughout The Decline of The West. Of the method of historical morphology developed from Goethe, Spengler states:

“Culture is the prime phenomenon of all past history and future world-history. The deep, and scarcely appreciated, idea of Goethe, which he discovered in his ‘living nature’ and always made the basis of his morphological researches, we shall here apply – in its most precise sense – to all the formation of man’s history, whether fully matured, cut off in the prime, half opened or stifled in the seed. It is the method of living into (erfühlen) the object, as opposed to dissecting it”. 106

This is what Spengler calls Goethe’s “looking into the heart of things”, “but the century of Darwin is as remote from such a vision as it is possible to be”. We look in vain for any treatment of history that is “entirely free from the methods of Darwinism”.107 Spengler credits Goethe with describing the “epochs of the spirit” of a civilisation that agrees with his own, preliminary, early, late, and civilised stages,108 which Goethe called in an 1817 essay, Epochs of the Spirit, the Ages of Poetry, Theology, Philosophy, and the Prosaic. They equate with Spengler’s seasonal metaphors (Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter) which he calls “spiritual epochs”.

The Age of Poetry is one of myth and imagination. The Age of the Holy or the Age of Theology, is one of religion and awe before the divine. Already in this epoch rationalism enters and “reason” destroys what it is reasoning about, proceeding with the Age of Reason (Age of Philosophy) or the Enlightenment as it is called in Western civilisation. The historical life-course ends with the Prosaic Age, which is the culmination of the prior epoch in rationalising mystery to extinction. This ends in confusion as the masses, detached from all spirituality, blindly attempt to find alternatives to the shallowness of the Prosaic Age.109

Spengler remains the most recognised exponent of what has been persistently called German “cultural pessimism”, distinct from the Anglo-American and French positivist utopian faith in perpetual progress. It is however nothing more than the “pessimism” of recognising that all organisms die, and are replaced by other organisms that go through the same life cycles, unless they are prematurely aborted by external factors such as invasion or natural disaster.

The Weimar era (1919-1933), during which Spengler wrote and lectured, starkly showed the character of Civilization in the degeneracy wrought by Germany’s wartime defeat. There were no barriers to experimentation in the arts and morals, and society sunk into depravity comparable to the mythic Sodom and Gomorra. However, there was nothing novel about this. The depravity had been enacted many times before over millennia.

Spengler made a comparative study of the cultural epochs of the Indian, Egyptian, Chinese, Classical, Arabian, and Western civilisations. He showed that each have analogous cycles of birth (Spring), adolescence (Summer), maturity (Autumn), and decay (Winter).

106 Spengler, The Decline…, Vol. I, 105.
107 Ibid.
108 Ibid., Vol. II, 37.
109 Erich Heller, 18-19.

Kerry Bolton
The Decline and Fall of Civilizations

Monday, February 17, 2020

Benton L. Bradberry - Jews in Weimar Germany

After the 1848 Revolution that swept Europe, most of the traditional restrictions placed on Jews were lifted. Germany was particularly generous to the Jews, giving them the same rights as all other citizens. With all restrictions lifted, Jews began to prosper in Germany at a rapid rate. In the rising prosperity that followed Germany’s consolidation into a single state in 1871, Jews prospered to a far higher degree than other Germans. Their remarkable ability to work together for the achievement of all Jews at the expense of the Gentile host population, gave them a strong competitive edge. Kaiser Wilhelm kept them out of government for the most part, so they did not acquire significant political power under the Kaiser. That was to change with the advent of the Weimar Republic which followed World War One and the Kaiser’s abdication, when restrictions barring Jews from civil service jobs were removed.

East European Jews also began to flood into Germany at this time as the result of the turmoil in that region caused by the war, the Russian Revolution that followed, and the Russian Civil War following that. Large numbers of people wanted to move out of those dangerous areas and cross over into Germany through East Prussia which bordered Russia. The head of German immigration and naturalization in the early period of the Weimar Republic happened to be Jewish (Herr Badt), who gave preference to Jews wanting to immigrate into Germany. At that same time, other European countries were still maintaining strict limits on Jewish immigration. These newcomers poring over the East Prussian border spread out and joined other Jewish communities which tended to locate in Germany’s larger cities. With the Kaiser now gone, and all bars against them lifted, Jews flooded into all government offices of the Weimar Republic. They also systematically invaded the professions and German institutions. Jews stick together as a race and always pull and shove each other up the ranks of institutions and organizations, and pull strings to ensure that members of their race are given first priority at student openings in major universities, and so forth. While Western Christians generally apply the test of “ability” in hiring and promotions, with considerations for ethnicity or religion being secondary, or of no consideration whatever, Jews choose their associates and subordinates primarily based on their being “Jewish,” and if they happen to have “ability” at the same time, well, that’s OK too. In Jewish controlled organizations in the Weimar Republic, the Gentile did not have a chance in competition for jobs or promotions. Jews always chose other Jews. This intense in-group cooperation and mutual assistance among Jews facilitated their rapid infiltration of every institution in Germany. The pattern has always been the same; Jews obtain positions within organizations, often concealing their Jewish identities by changing their names to Gentile names, and then either denying their Jewishness or by not calling attention to it. Once a Jew obtains a position, he brings other Jews in, and in the process, gradually pushes the non-Jews out. It was not long until Jews dominated Weimar Germany. (That same process is occurring in the United States today.)

Sir Arthur Bryant, a respected British historian, explained in his book, Unfinished Victory , 1940, that although Jews comprised less than 1% of the German population, they controlled 57% of the metal trade, 22% of grain, and 39% of the textile trade. More than 50% of the Berlin Chamber of Commerce was Jewish, as were an amazing 1,200 of the 1,474 members of the German Stock Exchange. German banking and finance was under the total control of Jews. It was estimated that during the Weimar Republic, the average income of Jews was three times that of non-Jews. In 1928, it was revealed that just fifteen Jews had occupied 718 board positions between them. Of leading positions in industry there were 2 Jews for every non-Jew.

Below is a comparison of the percentage of top positions in Commerce held by Jews in various German cities during the Weimar period with the low percentage of Jews in “blue collar” jobs:

Percentage of Jews
Top Positions in Commerce

Berlin 49.4%
Frankfurt 48.9%
Cologne 49.6%
Breslau 57.1%

 Percentage of Jews
Blue Collar Jobs

Berlin 2.4%
Frankfurt 1.9%
Cologne 2.9%
Breslau 1.8%


The political influence of the Jews in the Weimar Republic was enormously out of proportion to their numbers in the population. Of the Social Democratic Party’s 39 Representatives, 38 were Jews. The membership of The Workers Educational Institutes was 81% Jewish.

Of the 29 legitimate theaters in Berlin, 23 had Jewish directors. In 1931, of 144 film scripts made into movies, 119 were written by Jews, and 77 were produced by Jews. Not less than 75% of all plays were written by Jews.

Joseph Eberle wrote in the journal “Schonere Zukunft,” on February 3, 1929, “The share of Jews in the film industry is so decisive that a very slight percentage is left available for non-Jewish undertakings.”

It gets worse! Of university teachers: in Berlin, in the field of medicine, 45% were Jewish; in Gottingen, 34% of mathematics professors were Jewish, 34% of medical professors were Jewish, 40% in the arts were Jewish, and 47% in law were Jews; in Breslau, in medicine, 45% Jewish; in law, 48% Jewish; in arts, 25% Jewish; In Konigsberg, in arts, 7% Jewish; in law 14% Jewish; in medicine, 25% Jewish.

In 1928, the percentages of lawyers who were Jewish: in Dortmouth 29%, Hamburg 26%, Stuttgart 26%, Dusseldorf 33%, Karlsruhe 36%, Beuthen 60%, Frankfurt 64%, Stettin 36%, Berlin 66%.

Percentage of doctors in private practice who were Jewish (1928): Wiesbaden 20%, Karlsruhe 26%, Cologne 27%, Mainz 30%, Gotha 31%, Beuthen 36%, Berlin 52%.
Percentage of doctors in Berlin hospitals who were Jewish: Moabit Hospital 56%, Friedrichshain Hospital 63%, and Neukolln Hospital 52%.

In his book “Mein Leben als deutscher Jude” (My Life as a German Jew), 1980, Dr. Nahum Goldmann describes the “phenomenal rise of German Jewry” as follows:

“German Jewry, which found its temporary end during the Nazi period, was one of the most interesting and for modern Jewish history most influential centers of European Jewry. During the era of emancipation, i.e. in the second half of the nineteenth and in the early twentieth century, it had experienced a meteoric rise…. It had fully participated in the rapid industrial rise of Imperial Germany, made a substantial contribution to it and acquired a renowned position in German economic life. Seen from the economic point of view, no Jewish minority in any other country, not even that in America could possibly compete with the German Jews. They were involved in large scale banking, a situation unparalleled elsewhere, and, by way of high finance, they had also penetrated German industry. A considerable portion of the wholesale trade was Jewish. They controlled even such branches of industry which is in general not in Jewish hands. Examples are shipping or the electrical industry, and names such as Ballin and Rathenau do confirm this statement. I hardly know of any other branch of emancipated Jewry in Europe or the American continent that was as deeply rooted in the general economy as was German Jewry. American Jews of today are absolutely as well as relatively richer than the German Jews were at the time, it is true, but even in America with its unlimited possibilities the Jews have not succeeded in penetrating into the central spheres of industry (steel, iron, heavy industry, high finance, shipping), as was the case in Germany.

Their position in the intellectual life of the country was equally unique. In literature, they were represented by illustrious names. The theatre was largely in their hands. The daily press, above all its internationally influential sector, was essentially owned by Jews or controlled by them. As paradoxical as this may sound today, after the Hitler era, I have no hesitation to say that hardly any section of the Jewish people has made such extensive use of the emancipation offered to them in the nineteenth century as the German Jews! In short, the history of the Jews in Germany from 1870 to 1933 is probably the most glorious rise that has ever been achieved by any branch of the Jewish people”. Dr. Nahum Goldmann

Further, according to Goldmann, “The majority of the German Jews were never fully assimilated and were much more Jewish than the Jews in other West European countries”.

What Goldmann revealed, perhaps inadvertently, was that, precisely as the Nazis were saying, the Jews had taken control of most of Germany’s institutions. Yet, they numbered less than 1% of the German population, and as Goldmann also points out, they were never fully assimilated. This tiny elite were seen by the German people as aliens and not even German, yet, they literally ran the country. From this perspective, the rise of Hitler and the Nazi movement and its strong anti-Jewish sentiments become much easier to understand. Jewish propagandists today deny that the Jews were so powerful in Germany at that time.

Dr. Nahum Goldmann was an ardent Zionist who was denounced by the Nazis as a secret Communist agent shortly after the Beer Hall Putsch. He was stripped of his German citizenship in 1935 and later emigrated to the United States. He helped Rabbi Stephen Wise establish the World Jewish Congress and became one of the more active purveyors of sensational, but false, tales of Nazi atrocities against the Jews.

Jews Undermine German Culture

The Jews in Weimar Germany used their dominance in theater, film, and newspapers to ridicule traditional German culture and German ideals. Christianity was also targeted for ridicule. (That process is now occurring in the United States.) This was a period when Berlin gained an international reputation for decadence, debauchery, and pornography, as depicted in the Broadway musical and later movie, Cabaret , for example. Germany during the Weimar Republic underwent a virtually unparalleled period of social and cultural upheaval, to a great extent a result of the disillusionment over losing the war and the unjust peace treaty which followed.


Germans began to question the meaning of life. In Weimar’s early years, Germany was a society which had been cut loose from its traditional cultural moorings and set adrift.

The old norms and the old rules of social behavior didn’t seem to apply anymore. The war also produced a similar result in England and American, though to a much lesser extent, causing a sort of social malaise, as manifested in the so-called “lost generation.” The Jews used this climate of cultural uncertainty and loss of confidence among the German people to undermine and destroy what remained of the traditional German culture.

Debauchery in Weimar Germany

To make matters worse, Germany experienced a “runaway” inflation in 1923 which nearly destroyed the German economy. During the inflation, a loaf of bread cost four billion Marks. The middle class was wiped out, their life savings gone. People starved. Murder and violence were rampant, including sexual murder, or lustmord, which became a sensation in Weimar’s tabloids. Women from once respectable families could be seen prostituting themselves, their daughters, and even their sons on the streets of Berlin in order to survive. In the eyes of the world, Weimar Berlin became the epitome of decadence. Women dressed like men and flaunted their lesbian lovers. Nudity was everywhere. The very word “Weimar” conjured up images of cabarets, cross-dressers, open homosexuality and prostitution. Berlin, with other German cities not far behind, became a Mecca of scandal, moral degradation and nudity. Jewish control of the news, information, and entertainment industries was the perceived cause of this breakdown in public morals. It was well established that Jews controlled prostitution and pornography, as well as the white slave trade, during the Weimar years. To use the language of today, the Nazis were “socially conservative,” even puritanical in outlook, and saw themselves as the defenders of traditional, conservative, Christian, volkish German values. They denounced the licentiousness which had taken root in the country, and attributed it to Jewish influences. Weimar debauchery was the principle cause of the Nazi crackdown that followed.

Adolf Hitler wrote about it in “Mein Kampf:” “One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and theatre, and study the names of the authors who were highly lauded there in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions. Here was a pestilence, a moral pestilence from which the public was being infected. It was worse than the Black Plague of long ago. And in what mighty doses this poison was manufactured and distributed. Naturally, the lower the moral and intellectual level of such an author of artistic products the more inexhaustible his fecundity. Sometimes it went so far that one of these fellows, acting like a sewage pump, would shoot his filth directly in the face of other members of the human race…. It was a terrible thought, and yet it could not be avoided, that the greater number of Jews seemed specially designed by Nature to play this shameful part. The fact that nine tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one percent of the nation-- that fact could not be gainsaid. It was there. It had to be admitted.”

The Jewish influence in all of this civil discord in Germany was plain for anyone to see. A great majority of the Jews were Communists, which posed a mortal threat to the average German. The German people were fully aware of what had been happening in Russia at the hands of the Bolshevik Jews. Additionally, due to the rampant inflation, for it literally did take a wheel-barrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread, the only people who were able to buy either property or goods were those who could obtain money from outside the country, which, in most cases meant the Jews. In 1914, a German mark was valued at around twenty-five cents of American money. In 1923, four million marks equaled twenty-five cents. During this period many German families were forced to sell everything they had in order to survive. Upper-class Jews with foreign financial connections were able to buy up much of Germany’s material wealth for incredibly low prices. So-called Jewish “carpetbaggers” were everywhere, consuming the nation like parasites consume a cadaver. All classes of Jews in Germany advanced themselves during the Weimar years while the economic condition of ethnic Germans steeply declined.

Germany had narrowly avoided a Bolshevik takeover of the country similar to that which had occurred in Russia; saved from this fate, as it were, by the Freikorps, or private militias comprised of soldiers and officers who had recently returned from the front. Nevertheless, from the beginning of the Weimar Republic, a tense bifurcation of political power existed between the Communists on the one hand, and right wing political parties on the other, including the National Socialists. As Germany staggered under the weight of economic chaos, that is, inflation, followed by depression, the Jewish Communists made a relentless, concerted effort to take political control. Under the banner of Communism and through control of finance (two heads of the same dragon), the Jews threatened to take complete control of the country.

An editorial in “The Daily Mail of London” of July 10, 1933 stated: “The German nation… was rapidly falling under the control of its alien elements. In the days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before the war (WWI). Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves into key positions in the German administrative machine.”

Adolf Hitler said: “If the question is still asked why National Socialism combats the Jewish element in Germany so fanatically, the answer can only be, because National Socialism wishes to establish a real community of the people. Since we are National Socialists, we cannot permit an alien race to impose itself upon our working people as their leaders.”

The Myth of German Villainy
Benton L. Bradberry