Beverly Eckert - “My Silence Cannot Be Bought"

 Please understand that the perpetrators of this heinous crime, anticipated in advance all of the intense scrutiny of their actions, knowing full-well that not everyone is dumb enough to simply blindly, accept without question their version of events. Indeed, this is where their damage limitation abilities now come to the forefront; they are nothing if not past-masters of the art of deception and disinformation.

The controlled-media generally ignored the 9/11 ‘truth movement,’ until a few months before the 2004 election, when the movement began to gain traction. But now these forces of evil love to focus on that same ‘truth movement,’ just so long as they are able to denounce and ridicule it, in much the same way as with all those that question all their other false-flag atrocities.

By 2009, the ‘9/11 truth movement’ was so inundated with disinformation that it had become almost a laughing stock. Their easily-discredited claims contaminated the greater issue and tarnished dissenters, across the board. The Zionist media, whether corporate or foundation-funded, to further their own agenda, could easily find ‘shills,’ (paid agents of deliberate dis-information) ranting about ‘the Jews” or ‘the Illuminati,’ the ‘lizard people,’ the missiles, holograms, mini-nukes or space-beam weapons vapourising the Twin Towers, in order to discredit the entire truth movement. Many shills and even public personalities, played the roles of professional disinformation artists, hard at work concocting and posting far-fetched garbage online, which gullible others repeated to their own detriment and that of the movement as a whole. It is far from easy to prove that any individual is a paid shill, a disinformation agent or a cyber-agent provocateur, but be assured, they are out there in Internet-land, in huge numbers. I have indeed personally met two of these cynical individuals, on separate occasions and who both openly boasted of the fact.

The author Thomas Pynchon wrote, “ . . . If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers.” And if they can get you asking stupid questions, then their lapdog media can easily dismiss you as a ‘conspiracy nut.’ But please think for yourself. It is sometimes far from easy to discern or identify what is real information and what is not, but please do your own research to reach the truth, as 9/11 is surrounded by more deception and dis-information than almost any other topic.

The 9/11 truth movement is a prime target for dis-information, infiltration, and other forms of sabotage by forces who do not want the public asking difficult questions about 9/11. Believers of the official story may see the discussion of dis-information as further evidence of paranoia, but objective researchers will recognise the clear evidence of dis-information. Dis-information and counter-intelligence sabotage have long been used by government authorities in subverting progressive groups and causes.

Much dis-information is carefully crafted to appear legitimate and misleading evidence is often delivered alongside accurate information. Dis-information requires an intention to deceive whilst mis-information does not. In the 9/11 truth movement, both are apparent through evidence of materials, researchers, and groups that either consciously or unconsciously promote false or misleading information. Much incorrect information within the 9/11 truth community likely began as dis-information that has often been perpetuated as unintentional mis-information.

The objectives and methods of dis-information are very sophisticated. Here are some of the main strategies . . . 

The Straw Man Argument/Sensationalism. By promoting speculative, sensational, and false evidence, opponents can set-up easily debunk-able or dismiss-able points that can be used to lend credence to their position. The opposition prefers dealing with topics that can be easily countered, or that simply make 9/11 sceptics look like idiots.

Muddying the Waters. Making it harder to discern the real evidence/researchers/websites from the fake ones. This approach both frustrates efforts at understanding the subject and makes the project less focused and more frustrating to be a part of. For example, when a newcomer visits the ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ site, and sees that there are two mutually-exclusive, competing groups (that are each essentially calling the other ‘dis-info,’) then they may become frustrated or dismissive of the entire movement. Even if an individual is interested in researching the facts of 9/11, distinguishing between honest information and dis-information, between trustworthy and suspect sources, becomes another time-consuming occupation, thereby distracting real investigation.

Bad Jacketing / Death by Association / Smear Campaign. By associating the target idea / individual / movement along with another topic that is already discredited (UFOs, anti-Semitism, Nazis, etc.,) the original subject can be smeared and dismissed. These smear campaigns can be extremely effective, as most people are very concerned with the image of a group or subject with which they may become involved. This dynamic may be seen in action in the generalised image of ‘conspiracy theories.’ Many diverse topics, UFOs, 9/11, JFK, Illuminati, Satanism, New World Order, are commonly conflated with each other in people’s minds.

Paranoia / Divide and Conquer. One of the most effective ways to destroy a group is to sow distrust among members by knowingly providing them with false information in order to create suspicion between authentic activists. Seemingly paradoxically, dis-information agents may actually promote discussion of dis-information / infiltration in order to increase paranoia.

Now it is widely acknowledged, that anything photographic can be faked, even YouTube™ amateur videos that either attempt to show us the truth, or to distort it. But it is video evidence that is the most compelling, especially that of dedicated amateurs.

Oddly enough, some of the most legitimate facts and discoveries of 9/11 come from dis-info agents, such as Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Dave von Kleist and other prominent names. They take us maybe 80% of the way to the truth, then sharply veer away from it in order to mis-direct.

The real benefit of this whole 9/11 psy-op, dis-info tactic, to those who would deceive us, is that it overloads our senses, plays with our minds, and finally we trust nothing at all that we may read or hear.

As has been demonstrated, the Zionists had total control over the crime scenes, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and even the Shanksville site. They also had control of US telecommunications, the computer spyware of the US military and NORAD defence systems, the CIA, NSA, and the FBI. The US Joint Chiefs of Staff, President George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, the State Department, the Pentagon, were all in their thrall, too. In addition, this was coupled with total control of the mass-media, TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, the internet, including numerous ‘9/11 truth’ sites.

They also had total control of the 9/11 ‘investigations,’ and the 9/11 Commission and its report and total control of the evidence, both in destroying and manufacturing it.

And perhaps even more significantly, the Zionists had total control of 9/11 justice, from releasing the guilty Israeli ‘students,’ to framing innocent Arabs and the handling all litigation and legal procedures associated with 9/11. If Israeli agents were not prime suspects in the ‘false flag’ terror attacks on the World Trade Center, and if a passenger screening company owned by Israeli intelligence agents were not a defendant in the 9/11 litigation, the fact that the crucial 9/11 lawsuits were handled by two Zionist judges from the same synagogue, may be considered as a coincidence. But with so much evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11 in plain view, the intimate connection with the State of Israel of these judges cannot be discarded as mere coincidence. It should rather be viewed as evidence of the on-going, high-level, and well-planned Zionist cover-up.

The federal judges, Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey, were both members of a Zionist congregation, the orthodox Kehilath Jeshrun synagogue of Manhattan, and were active supporters of its yeshiva, the Ramaz School. Hellerstein, who presided over the 9/11 litigation process, also had a connection to the Mossad through his son, Joseph. This is of crucial importance because one of the key defendants in the 9/11 wrongful death, tort litigation process was the Mossad-controlled airport security firm named ICTS which was in turn, the owner of Huntleigh USA, the passenger screening company that checked the passengers boarding the aircraft at the key airports on 9/11.

Whilst Michael Chertoff supervised the confiscation and destruction of the critical evidence, government appointed doctors ‘medicated’ the grieving relatives with mood-altering Prozac, and Kenneth Feinberg began his war of attrition on the families of the victims of 9/11.  Eligibility for the Victim Compensation Fund required the victims’ ‘physical harm or death’ as a result of one of the crashes, before compensation would be considered, to one of the relatives of a deceased victim.

But the ‘catch’ was the waiver of a claimant’s right to independently file suit, if he or she applied for fund money. In other words, accepting a fund payment automatically disbarred the relative from pursuing a lawsuit against the airlines or the US government. If victims or survivors decided not to take the money, the new law stated that they could “ . . . bring in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, an exclusive cause of action for damages based upon the substantive law, including choice of law principles, of the State in which the crash occurred unless such law was inconsistent with or pre-empted by Federallaw.”

All those who settled for fund pay-outs, those who took the ‘hush money,’ were thereby kept quiet with gag orders and non-disclosure clauses, and their ideas of the truth about 9/11 would never be revealed in a courtroom. Very clever, indeed. So this federally funded pay-off to the families effectively prevented the possibility for almost all relatives to obtain justice or truth through the legal process, which would no doubt have caused some uncomfortable or unpalatable truths of the events of 9/11, to be revealed.

The Kenneth Feinberg Group, one of his highly profitable enterprises, was listed as one of the top ten supporters of the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies for 2004-2005. The Jerusalem Institute is an Israel-based Zionist organisation that supports the building of the illegal separation wall across Palestine, for example. The Feinberg Group also listed as its clients, major insurance and re-insurance companies such as Lloyds of London and these were the companies who stood to lose billions, had 9/11 victims’ lawsuits been forthcoming.

Feinberg was tasked with the prevention of the real facts of 9/11 from being disclosed in a court of law. He was a man whose job was to severely limit any compensation to the victims and victim’s families of this bloody crime spree, a man who was good friends with, and in league with, the mass-murdering masterminds of 9/11.

On 9/11, Barry Jennings reported that he and Michael Hess had been blown back by a big explosion inside WTC-7. He later said in an interview that he had heard explosions in Building 7 before either Tower had collapsed. And he also reported that he was stepping over bodies when he left the building, contradicting the official claim that no-one died in WTC-7. Jennings died mysteriously on 19th August 2008, two days before the release of the NIST Report’s first draft. The cause of death was undisclosed. A private investigator was hired by his family to investigate his strange death, but he quickly returned the money he had been paid, referred the case back to law enforcement and that was that. But why does the death of Barry Jennings continue to be shrouded in mystery and what was it that scared-off a highly-paid private investigator?

As in the case of the JFK assassination, many people knew many secrets, and were unafraid to talk about them, but unfortunately this brought them to the attention of powerful forces, and were thus considered a threat. Human life is indeed cheap, to the banksters. Whether it is one single life, or that of billions of lives, it does not matter in the slightest to them. They are simply sacrificed for the banksters’ evil goals. It is just business, nothing personal.

Beverly Eckert was murdered by Zionist operatives who were threatened by her relentless pursuit for justice regarding the death of her husband, Sean Rooney, whom she had loved dearly. Rooney had died a terrible, heart-rending death as WTC-2 collapsed around him and it was a truly horrendous event. Beverly was actually speaking on the phone with Sean, who was trapped in the building, and while she was speaking to him, saying a tearful goodbye, he died in the collapse.

In her own words, she said . . . “I guess I wish I wasn’t here, because it was such a different life before September 11th. I never envisioned myself speaking to the public having to say anything other than about my own little life. I was just like everyone else, very complacent, very content. World events didn’t seem to affect me, that’s what I believed at the time. All that changed on September 11th, and I guess I just found that I couldn’t just sit back and be a victim. I hate that word. I guess we’re always called victims’ families and things like that. I hate that term, what it conveys is helplessness and no control. I think it’s just been part of my healing process to see if I can make something good happen out of allthis.

BeverlyEckertMy husband Sean worked in the South Tower, his office was on the 98th floor with a couple of hundred other people and he didn’t really have a good understanding of evacuation and escape options and so they went up, only to find that the doors were locked. They had a window of opportunity to escape down Staircase A, there were three staircases in the South Tower. I think they thought that the rooftop was an option, and so they went up and they were trapped because the roof doors were locked. And I heard from him, he called me and was able to get through to me so I was one of the very lucky family members, I was able to say goodbye. I know what happened to him, I know what his last moments were like. He was very brave. He was a hero. So I have a legacy that I have, that I thought just to take his strength and try to do something positive with it. He was a really strong individual his whole life and I’m kind of feeling infused with that now. I’m trying to make a difference. I’m trying to find the truth in all this chaos.”

Beverly had also issued this statement . . . 

“My Silence Cannot BeBought

Beverly Eckert, Friday, 19thDecember 2003

I’ve chosen to go to court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Instead, I want to know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four US passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease. I want to know why two 110-story skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and why escape and rescue options were so limited.

I am suing because unlike other investigative avenues, including congressional hearings and the 9/11 commission, my lawsuit requires all testimony be given under oath and fully uses powers to compel evidence.The victims fund was not created in a spirit of compassion. Rather, it was a tacit acknowledgement by Congress that it tampered with our civil justice system in an unprecedented way. Lawmakers capped the liability of the airlines at the behest of lobbyists who descended on Washington while the September 11 fires still smouldered. And this liability cap protects not just the airlines, but also World Trade Center builders, safety engineers and other defendants.

The caps on liability have consequences for those who want to sue to shed light on the mistakes of 9/11. It means the playing field is tilted steeply in favour of those who need to be held accountable. With the financial consequences other than insurance proceeds removed, there is no incentive for those whose negligence contributed to the death toll to acknowledge their failings or implement reforms. They can afford to deny culpability and play a waitinggame.

By suing, I’ve forfeited the ‘$1.8 million average award’ for a death claim I could have collected under the fund. Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don’t get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress dothen?”

Eckert was one of the few surviving relatives who refused to accept the ‘hush money’ offered by Kenneth Feinberg and took her own action, ultimately leading to the White House and beyond. She sought only justice for her husband and in so-doing publicly referred to the Zionist-orchestrated Project for the New American Century, as the “most sinister” of all documents she had ever seen. Eckert had gathered evidence that former President Bush knew all about the attacks in advance and had even contributed to the planning of them. Because of her relentless activism she was ‘allowed’ to meet with Barack Obama, informing him that she would not rest until justice was served, and also demanded that George Bush be investigated for conspiracy and complicity in mass-murder.

Less than a week later, Beverly Eckert was dead.

She had met with Obama in 2009 at the White House asking him to open a new 9/11 investigation. Obama shook her hand on TV, then sent her on a ‘complimentary’ flight to Buffalo to celebrate her late husband’s 58th birthday anniversary. The plane crashed just 6 days after the meeting with Obama and Beverly Eckert was silenced forever.

The crash of Continental Express flight 3407 brought tragedy to the friends and family of all 50 victims, but for one family, grief struck for a second time. The plane was flying without cause for concern, but then it suddenly began pitching wildly and crashed. The slick media ‘experts’ claimed it was due to ice, yet the plane had powerful de-icing systems. Suspiciously, there was a strong FBI presence at the crash scene. The FBI only investigates cases where the NTSB has determined that ‘foul play’ is involved. They stated that criminal action was ruled out, yet their presence proved otherwise.

This suggests that they knew there was foul play and that their only purpose at the scene was to enact a cover-up operation. The forensics team was led by the same man who led the forensics recovery efforts for Flight 93 in Shanksville. This man was a FEMA operative who had also worked with the UN on the crash of Egyptian Airlines 990 (another black-op.) Was he considered a ‘safe pair of hands,’ for dealing with these incidents?

Marvin Bush’s house maid, Bertha Champagne, was killed on 29th September 2003 on Marvin’s property.  As with many other bizarre stories relating to the Bush family, Bertha was crushed to death in Marvin’s driveway by her own vehicle which pinned her against the garage.  The investigation concluded that it was an ‘accident.’ What did she know?

There were so many other ‘convenient’ deaths, too. Here is just a sample . . . 

Kenneth Johannemann, an eyewitness to explosions inside WTC, saw “floors just blow up.” He suffered a gunshot wound to the head, ruled as a suicide.

Prasanna Kalahasthi, the wife of a 9/11 ‘Flight 11 passenger.’ Her death was ruled as a ‘suicide by hanging.’

David Graham, a dentist who saw three of the 9/11 hijackers (after the event) with a Pakistani businessman in Shreveport, Louisiana, was murdered by poisoning with anti-freeze.

Paul Smith, a helicopter pilot for WABC7 on 9/11, died in a ‘car accident.’

Michael H. Doran, a 9/11 victims lawyer, died in a plane crash.

Christopher Landis, the former Operations Manager for the Safety Service Patrol for the Virginia Department of Transportation, interviewed by makers of the documentary exposé ‘The Pentacon’ and who gave the filmmakers a photographic collection, containing evidence that the Pentagon attacks were not as officially described. Death ruled as a ‘suicide.’

An un-named ticket agent at Boston, Logan airport who allegedly checked-in Atta and Alomari. Death ruled as a ‘suicide.’

Perry Kucinich, the brother of the Congressman who advocated a new 9/11 investigation. Fell down some stairs.

Salvatore Princiotta, the firefighter from Ladder 9. Murdered.

Deborah Palfrey ran a ‘high-class’ prostitution ring in Washington DC, that had several of the 9/11 perpetrators among its clients.

She naively said in an interview with Alex Jones, that . . . “I have information that would be of great interest to the 9/11 Commission. There’s information that I have that would have been very important for the 9/11 Commission to know, having to do with intelligence picked up about 9/11 before it happened.”

Alex Jones: “The fact that you’re so visible, really protects you, going on Larry King and other big shows. Do you want to put it on record that you’re not planning to commit suicide?”

Deborah Palfrey: “No, I’m not planning to commit suicide. I’m planning to go into court on April 17th if indeed we do have the trial, and I plan on defending myself vigorously and I plan on exposing the government in ways that I do not think they want me to expose them on.”

On 15th April 2008, a police spokesman said that when Deborah’s mother, Blanche went outside, she noticed that the bicycle that was normally kept in the shed, had been moved. Then upon entering the shed located on the west side of the residence, Blanche Palfrey discovered her daughter Deborah had apparently hung herself from a metal beam on the ceiling of the shed, using a nylon rope. She then called 911. At approximately 11.01 am, the Fire Rescue department pronounced Deborah Palfrey dead from suicide.

So in conclusion, there is monumental corroborating evidence that Israel played a central role in the 9/11 attacks, aided and abetted by corrupt elements of the Bush administration. This is reinforced by Zionists’ many roles in the cover-up.

Those who are relatively new to the issues of false-flag terrorism, Zionism and the New World Order may be asking themselves if suggestions that ‘Israel did 9/11’ is just another ‘conspiracy theory’ or is ‘anti-Semitic.’ That particular dis-information has been disseminated by the 9/11 perpetrators themselves, who love to exploit it as a means of deflecting attention from themselves, their crimes and deceptions.

We also have Israelis with proven foreknowledge, a highly-placed Zionist with access to the best Flight Termination System for electronically hijacking aircraft via a Command Transmitter System, an Israeli Instant Messaging service through which two hours’ advance knowledge of an attack on the World Trade Center was transmitted, and Zionists who were friends with four Israeli prime ministers and who took control of the WTC lease, and insured the buildings against terror attacks for billions of dollars, six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in terror attacks, not forgetting to insert a clause stating that in the event of a terrorist attack the partners could not only collect the insured value of the property, but would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease.

I would assert that the original plan was to have both Twin Towers collapse at around 10.00 am, which would allow the perpetrators’ lackeys sufficient time to exit WTC-7, and then have Flight 93 strike WTC-7 at around 10.30 am. This third strike would provide the pretext for the planned WTC-7 collapse, which was necessary in order to eliminate evidence of the remote-control transmitters for controlling Flights 11, 175, and 93, that is, if remote-controlled planes or drones were used, and radio controls for the detonating of charges in each of the Twin Towers. However, Flight 93, scheduled to depart at 8.00 am, was delayed because of congestion and did not depart until 8.42. At 9.36 am, Flight 93 filed a new flight-plan to arrive in Washington at 10.28. Unfortunately for the perpetrators, the US air defences could not be delayed indefinitely, and so United Airlines 93, was shot down near Shanksville at 10.06 am. The Zionist plotters still had to demolish WTC-7, but were now without a convenient ‘suicide-piloted’ passenger plane to hand. Hence, the official story was compelled to ridiculously assert that the collapse of WTC-7 was solely as a result of ‘fires.’

And after the event,  the Zionist ‘mafia’ and the Bush Administration had a false pretext for the attacking and looting of nations that were now deemed ‘fair game’ as states who ‘sponsored terrorism.’ The CIA was anxious to invade Afghanistan in order to get back into the opium trade, which had proven highly lucrative for them until the intervention of the Taliban. The Bushes and their partners-in-crime hoped to profit from Iraq’s oil wealth, from looting its Oil-for-Food fund, and from extensive reconstruction contracts, all of which were conveniently offered to their cronies. Israel wished to see its Arab neighbours neutered, and maybe even turned into its ‘satellite colonies’ as the US, UK and Germany already were. But their immediate interest was Iraq, not Afghanistan. The Bush family had business links with the bin Ladens, and Osama was selected as the arch-villain since his health was rapidly failing and he was not expected to survive long. But it was much easier to link Osama with Afghanistan than Iraq.

And so, the world was redefined after 11th September 2001, just as it had been so many times before, with previous earth shattering and cataclysmic, false flag events. But it was now the new age of the ‘War on Terror,’ however the only terrorism in existence was being instigated by the very same people allegedly fighting against it.

Behind The Curtain

A Chilling Exposé of the Banking Industry

John Hamer

German Hyperinflation 1923

 

The true facts of this financial disaster do not appear in any history textbooks today.  Today’s history uses this inflation to twist the truth into its opposite.  It cites the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels run by the banksters.  In reality the exact opposite is the truth as with so much of our accepted historical wisdom today.

The Weimar financial crisis actually began with the impossible reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht (who was never a Nazi Party member and now it appears clear why that was the case), the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the Republic, opposed letting the German government print its own money…

 “The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany.  Germany could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes.”

Schacht echoes the history books’ deception that Weimar inflation was caused when the German government printed its own money; however, in his 1967 book ‘The Magic of Money’, Schacht revealed that it was the privately owned ‘Reichsbank’, not the German government that was injecting new money into the economy. Thus, it was that this Elite-owned and run private bank caused the Weimar hyperinflation.

Like the US Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by appointed government officials, but was operated for private gain.  What drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation was speculation by foreign investors, who sold the German Mark short, betting on its decreasing value.  In the manipulative device known as the ‘short sell’, speculators borrow something they do not own, sell it, and then ‘cover’ by buying it back at the lower price.

Speculation in the German Mark was made possible because the privately owned Reichsbank (not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing.  This currency, like all first-world currency today, was created with accounting entries in the bank’s books and then this ‘magic’ money was lent at compound interest.  When the Reichsbank could not keep up with the voracious demand for Marks, other private banks were then allowed to also create Marks out of nothing and to lend them at interest.  The result was runaway debt and inflation.

On the 24th June 1922, right-wing fanatics assassinated Walter Rathenau, the moderate German foreign minister.  Rathenau was a charismatic figure and the idea that a popular, wealthy and glamorous government minister could be shot in a law-abiding society shattered the faith of the German people, who needed to believe that the country was in safe hands after the trauma of the previous decade. The wealthier, by now extremely nervous citizens were already taking their money out of banks and investing it into ‘real goods’ such as diamonds, works of art and safe real-estate, with true intrinsic values, unlike currency which the Elite will manipulate up or downwards to suit their own agendas. Eventually, the ordinary German citizens also began to trade their Marks for real commodities.

 The British historian Adam Fergusson noted that pianos were being bought, even by non-musical families.  Sellers held back because the Mark was worth less every day and as prices soared, the amounts of currency demanded became greater and greater and the German Central Bank responded to these demands through the printing of more, increasingly worthless paper.  Yet still the ruling authorities did not acknowledge that there was anything amiss.  A leading financial newspaper at the time, reported that the amounts of money in circulation were not excessively high but nevertheless Dr. Rudolf Havenstein, the president of the Reichsbank (German equivalent to the Federal Reserve / Bank of England) told an economics professor that he needed a new suit but wasn't going to buy one until prices came down.

 Why did the German government not act sooner to halt the inflation?  The problem was partly that it was a shaky, fragile government, especially after the assassination of Rathenau.  The vengeful French sent their army into the Ruhr to enforce their demands for reparations due under the Versailles Treaty and the Germans were powerless to resist due to the virtual disbandment of their armed forces and they feared unemployment far more than inflation.  In 1919, Communists had attempted a coup and severe unemployment may have given the Communists another opportunity to seize power.  The great German industrial combines Krupp, Thyssen, IG Farben and Stinnes welcomed the inflation and survived it well by astute forward planning and possibly foreknowledge of what was to come.  A cheaper Mark, they reasoned, would make German goods cheap and easy to export and they needed the export earnings to buy raw materials abroad.  Inflation kept everyone working.

 And so the printing presses continued producing the ever-decreasing in value Mark and once they began to run, they were impossible to stop.  The price increases became unmanageable.  Menus in cafes could not be revised quickly enough to keep up with the speed of the inflation.  A student at Freiburg University ordered a cup of coffee at a café and the price on the menu was 5,000 Marks per cup.  He had two cups but when the bill arrived, it was for 14,000 Marks.  ‘If you want to save money and you want two cups of coffee, you should order them both at the same time’, he was told by the proprietor.

Things became so bad that people would not even bother to bend down to pick up a one hundred million Mark note carelessly discarded by a passer-by as by that time it had become worth less than the paper upon which it was printed.  There was a famous case of a man walking along a street on a shopping trip to buy bread, carrying his money in a large wicker basket, such was the quantity and bulk of the notes he needed to carry.  Upon unsuccessfully attempting to enter a particularly busy shop, he reasoned that he could quite safely leave most of his money outside in the basket as no-one would bother to risk stealing such a bulky yet paltry amount of money.  He was absolutely correct.  When he returned, he found his money was all still there but someone had stolen his basket!

 The presses of the Reichsbank could not keep up to demand, even though they ran through the night.  Individual cities and states began to issue their own money and Dr. Havenstein, the president of the Reichsbank, did not get his new suit.  A factory worker described payday, which was every day at 11 am: ‘At 11:00 in the morning a siren sounded, and everyone gathered in the factory forecourt, where a five-ton lorry was drawn up loaded to overflowing with paper money.  The chief cashier and his assistants climbed up on top.  They read out names and just threw out bundles of notes.  As soon as you had caught one you made a dash for the nearest shop and bought just anything that was going.’  Teachers, paid at 10 am, brought their money to the playground, where relatives took the bundles and hurried off with them.  Banks closed at 11am as by this time they had invariably run out of cash anyway.

 The flight from currency that had begun with the buying of diamonds, gold, country houses and antiques now extended to minor and almost useless items, bric-a-brac, soap and hairpins to name but a few.  This hitherto law-abiding country crumbled into petty thievery, petrol (gasoline) was siphoned from cars and people bought things they didn't need and used them to barter.  A pair of shoes for a shirt or some crockery for coffee.  Berlin had an unreal atmosphere, prostitutes of both sexes roamed the streets and cocaine was the fashionable drug.  When the 1,000-billion Mark note was first issued in 1923, few bothered to collect the change when they spent it.  By November 1923, with one dollar equal to one trillion Marks, the breakdown was complete and the German economy had become one of barter.  The currency had completely lost its meaning.

 Then, a new president took over the Reichsbank, Horace Greeley Hjalmar Schacht, who came by his first two names because of his father's admiration for an editor of the New York Tribune.  The Rentenmark was not Schacht's idea, but he executed it and as the Reichsbank president, he got the credit for it.  For decades afterward he was able to maintain a reputation for financial wizardry and he became the architect of the financial prosperity brought by the Nazi party.

 Obviously, although the currency was worthless, Germany was still a rich country with mines, farms, factories, and natural resources aplenty.  The backing for the Rentenmark was mortgages on the land and bonds on the factories, but that backing was a fiction; the factories and land could not be turned into cash or used abroad.  Nine zeros were struck from the currency, that is, one Rentenmark was equal to one billion old Marks.  The Germans wanted desperately to believe in the Rentenmark, and so they simply did. 

But although the country slowly began to function almost normally again, the savings of the middle-classes were never restored, nor were the values of hard work and decency that had accompanied the savings.   With the currency went many of the lifetime plans of average, ordinary citizens.  It was the custom for the bride to bring some money to a marriage; so many marriages were called off and many widows dependent on insurance found themselves destitute.  People who had worked for a lifetime and built up a sizeable pension fund, found that their pensions would not even buy a cup of coffee.  Such are the ways that the ordinary citizens of the world are cheated out of the money by these vultures. 

“The cities were still there, the houses not yet bombed and in ruins, but the victims were millions of people.  They had lost their fortunes, their savings; they were dazed and inflation-shocked and did not understand how it had happened to them and who the foe was who had defeated them.  Yet they had lost their self-assurance, their feeling that they themselves could be the masters of their own lives if only they worked hard enough; and lost, too, were the old values of morals, of ethics, of decency.”  Pearl Buck, American author

Thus, according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar hyperinflation.  On the contrary, the government brought hyperinflation under control.  It placed the Reichsbank under strict government regulation and took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation.  One of those measures was to eliminate easy access to loans from private banks and eventually Hitler regained Germany’s financial stability through the issuance of Government Treasury Certificates.

Schacht, the Rothschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money (obviously) and was consequently dismissed as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to issue it.  Nevertheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which states (for obvious reasons) that currency must be borrowed from private cartels.

What really causes hyperinflation is uncontrolled speculation.  When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is always disaster.  On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected.  Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.

Naturally this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers and it also terrifies the Elite, since their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government and everything else.  Were the nations of the world to revert to Government-only money issuance, then the world financial crisis would be solved overnight, as would much of the ever-increasing poverty and suffering we are currently witnessing.

Significantly, it was in the midst of this financial carnage that further devastated an already prostrate nation, that an unobtrusive, former army corporal was thrust into the spotlight and promoted as a great ‘leader of men’.  The prevailing conditions of the time providing a perfect stage for anyone with any aspirations of greatness and the ability to ‘mesmerise’ his audiences with nationalist, patriotic rhetoric.  And thus the world was introduced to the soon-to-be world public enemy number one, Adolf Hitler…

The Falsification Of HistoryOur Distorted RealityBy

John Hamer

“Everyone should know that the ‘war on cancer’ is largely a fraud.”

 Cancer

“Everyone should know that the ‘war on cancer’ is largely a fraud.” Linus Pauling, Nobel Laureate

“I keep telling people to stop giving money to ‘cancer research’ because no one is frigging looking for a cure. We have several and they have been carefully hidden away from public view . . . this is a multi-billion dollar per year industry and a ‘cure’ would put a lot of people out of work.” Geraldine Phillips, cancer research worker, 2011

“The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination.” Dr Robert Bell, former Vice President, International Society for Cancer Research

Dr James Watson won a Nobel Prize along with Dr Francis Crick for discovering and describing the double helix shape of the DNA molecule at Cambridge University in the early 1950s and during the early 1970s he served two years on the US National Cancer Advisory Board. In 1975, he was asked his thoughts about the American National Cancer Programme. Watson declared, “It’s a bunch of shit.” Blunt and crude though his assessment may be, it also happens to be true.

Cancer, that ‘life-threatening disease’ and ruthless killer of countless millions of mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters in the last 100 years or more, is relatively easy to cure and even easier to prevent.

I am acutely aware of the emotive subject that cancer has become and do not make this glib-sounding statement lightly, but with due deference to the millions who have lost loved ones and / or suffered terribly and had their own lives cruelly cut short for what amounts to no reason at all, unless of course you consider the vast, unimaginable profits made by the purveyors of this great criminal racket, for criminal racket is exactly what it is.

In 1953, a United States Senate investigation reported in its initial findings that there was the strong suspicion of an ongoing conspiracy to suppress and destroy effective cancer treatments. The Senator in charge of the investigation died suddenly in unexplained circumstances, the usual MO (modus operandi or operating method) in these cases, which was obviously very convenient for those with much to lose from his revelations. As a result of his death, the investigation was subsequently, suddenly disbanded without further ado and was never resumed. Unsurprisingly, the good Senator was neither the first nor the last of literally hundreds if not thousands of strange, unexplained deaths involving people in positions to threaten the interests of those running the Elite controlled cancer programmes and indeed the Elite controlled anything else. Ethical people who attempt to disrupt the flow of profits into the Elite’s coffers have to be silenced one way or another, after all.

But this is only the small tip of a very large and extremely dangerous iceberg. In 1964, the FDA spent millions of dollars to suppress and bury an ‘alternative’ cancer treatment which had cured hundreds, if not thousands of cancer patients according to well-documented sources. It became apparent and was later disclosed that in the subsequent court proceedings, the FDA had falsified the testimony of witnesses, to suit its own ends. The FDA lost the court case because the jury found the defendants innocent and recommended that the substance be evaluated, objectively. In fact it never was evaluated but instead all the evidence was totally suppressed and then conveniently ‘lost.’

For many years (and still to this day), the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) coordinated their own ‘blacklists’ of cancer researchers who were regarded as threats to their cancer monopoly and who were to be singled-out for smear campaigns and ostracised by the mainstream. One investigative reporter declared the AMA and ACS to be “ . . . a network of vigilantes prepared to pounce on anyone who promotes a cancer therapy that runs against their substantial prejudices and profits.” The ACS, believe it or not actually makes political donations! A ‘charitable organisation’ that makes political donations? What does this tell us about them and the system within which they operate?

In the late 1950s, it was learned that Dr Henry Welch, head of the FDA’s Division of Antibiotics, had secretly received $287,000 (a colossal sum in those days) from the drug companies he was supposed to regulate. In 1975, an independent government evaluation of the FDA still found massive ‘conflicts of interest’ among the agency’s top personnel.

And In 1977, an investigative team from the prominent newspaper ‘Newsday’ found serious ‘conflicts of interest’ at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and in 1986, an organised coverup of an effective alternative cancer therapy, orchestrated by NCI officials, was revealed during Congressional hearings. The list goes on and on and once again, I strongly suggest to the reader that they should undergo their own research on this topic and not simply take my word for it. It is extremely simple. Just key into a search engine, the phrase ‘alternative cancer treatments,’ or ‘cancer has been cured,’ for example, plus any other similar or relevant phrase. However please be aware that there is now so much Internet censorship, especially through the chief culprit in this regard, Google™ that many useful websites which contain this information are consigned to total anonymity by the simple expedient of being suppressed by search engines. Some do ‘slip through the net’ though.

The cancer ‘industry’ now has a more than 70-year history of vast corruption, incompetence and organised terror against its many detractors and a shameful track record of suppression of cancer therapies which are actually beneficial. Millions, if not billions of people have suffered terrible torture and death because those in charge took bribes, had closed minds to the innovative, or simply were afraid to do what was obviously and ethically correct. Instead, corporate, and individual greed and the desire of the few to profit from the many, as always, take precedence.

“The doctor’s union (AMA) the cancer bureaucracy (NCI) the public relations fat-cats (ACS) and the cancer cops (FDA) are conspiring to suppress a cure for cancer . . . It would be easy for any Congressional committee, major newspaper, television network or national magazine to confirm and extend the evidence presented here in order to initiate radical reform of the critical cancer areas -- the hospitals, the research centres, the government agencies, and especially state and local legislation regarding cancer treatment.

But that will not happen without a struggle. Neither Congress nor the media desire to lift the manhole cover on this sewer of corruption and needless torture. Only organized, determined citizen opposition to the existing cancer treatment system has any hope of bringing about the long-needed changes. I expect the struggle to be a long, difficult one against tough, murderous opposition. The odds against success are heavy. The vested interests are very powerful . . . ” Barry Lynes, ‘The Healing of Cancer’

There is a veritable mountain of overwhelming evidence and examples which support the theory of collusion between activities of Western governments, especially the United States, along with other prominent members of the ‘medical Elite’ to prevent an effective cancer treatment being promulgated.

Surgery is a massive shock to the system, uses carcinogenic anaesthesia and increases the risk of cancer in the resultant scar tissue. It has value only where the threat to life processes is immediate, as in digestive obstruction etc. The routine removal of every malignant or sometimes even benign lump, surrounded by the body with a defensive shield, can be virtually a death sentence, especially in the elderly.

Chemotherapy involves the use of extremely toxic petrochemical drugs originally derived from the highly toxic chemical weapon nitrogen mustard also known as ‘mustard gas’ famous for its deadly use in battle during WWI. Oddly enough, in 1942, two Yale doctors (Goodman and Gilman) after researching the poisonous effect of mustard gas on WWI soldiers, decided since the gas seemed to destroy normal white blood cells (and notably lead to cancer) in these exposed victims maybe it could also destroy cancer cells. So they experimented on a patient (simply referred to as J.D.) with advanced lymphoma who had several serious tumour growths and found that nitrogen mustard significantly shrunk the tumours. Never mind J.D. still died 6 months later, the reduction in tumour size was enough to declare the procedure as a ‘success’ and bring the drug, with minor modifications, to market. Chemotherapy, despite its questionable origins, is still used today in the hope, which is often never realised, of killing the disease before killing the patient. The drugs are designed to kill all fast growing cells, cancerous or not, and to systematically poison all cells caught in the act of division. The effects include hair loss, violent nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, cramps, impotence, sterility, extreme pain, fatigue, extreme cognitive impairment or ‘brain fog’ (aka ‘chemo-brain’), cancer and death. According to the government’s own figures, around 2% of chemotherapy recipients are still alive after 5 years. The term ‘alive’ is used here in its literal sense, i.e. not yet clinically dead. One of chemotherapy’s less well-known side-effects is pneumonia. Many cancer patients die of this after undergoing chemo treatment and their cause of deaths are not recorded as ‘cancer.’ In this way, death statistics can easily be manipulated to demonstrate that they are ‘winning the war’ against cancer.

“Toxic chemotherapy is a hoax. The doctors who use it are guilty of premeditated murder. I cannot understand why women take chemotherapy and suffer so terribly for no purpose.” Oncologist, Channel 4 TV, 2010

Radiotherapy likewise is equally, if not more deadly. One person who chose to have treatment with the radiation machine turned off altogether was the British Grand National winning jockey Bob Champion. Convinced by the early detectors, in spite of feeling well, that he was “ . . . likely to die of cancer of the lymph gland,” he decided that he did not relish the thought of a treatment that “ . . . could have ruined his lungs,” let alone the rest of him. He eventually survived the alternative treatment and the ‘lymphoma.’ His doctor, the ‘cancer specialist,’ Ann Barrett, declared that “He is the only patient in my experience who has come through this disease and achieved such a high degree of physical fitness afterwards. His recovery is even more remarkable when you consider that he refused to have the conventional treatment!” Or not?

The plight of the ever-increasing number of parents of child cancer victims facing ‘radiotherapy’ was well illustrated in October 1993 “ . . . after learning of the appalling side-effects of radiotherapy . . . her anxious mother has opted to take her to America for private treatment . . . ‘I’ve been told the radiotherapy will cause brain damage knocking forty points off her I.Q . . . Her growth would be stunted . . . she would need hormones to help her growth and sexual development. It is also likely she would be sterile.’” Further associated ‘delights’ include bone and nerve damage, leading to amputation of limbs, severe burns and of course, death, at a future time, from cancer and leukaemia due to the highly carcinogenic effects of the huge doses of radiation.

“Chemotherapy and radiotherapy will make the ancient method of drilling holes in a patient’s head, to permit the escape of demons; look relatively advanced . . . the use of cobalt . . . effectively closes the door on cure.” A cancer researcher who wished to remain anonymous

The 90/95% death rate within a five year period has not stopped the cancer industry from carrying out the same procedures, day in, day out, for decades with the same deadly, inevitable results. Temporarily suppressing, with the scalpel, drug or radiation the symptoms of cancer does nothing for the victim’s chances of survival.

Adding gross insult to injury, the treatment involves massive doses of carcinogens and super-poisons. The patient is subject to a regime diametrically opposed to that which is needed for survival. Succumbing to cancer is an acceptable form of suicide for those who have lost the desire to live, this loss being a major factor in the development of the disease in the first place. The great tragedy and scandal is in cases where the victim has a strong determination to live and fight but is then destroyed by the assault from the lethal, useless treatment and not by the cancer itself.

So why are the vast majority of doctors against alternative cancer treatments and why would they actively encourage us to undergo known-to-be-dangerous treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery instead of using natural cures?

Unfortunately, doctors are against ‘alternative’ treatments because from the first day of Elite-controlled medical school, they are brainwashed into believing that disease can only be effectively treated by those methods proscribed by Big Pharma. They most certainly will have been led to believe that there are no cures for cancer, when in reality there are several, none of which will enhance the profits of Big Pharma or sustain the payments on a senior hospital consultant’s Aston Martin. Additionally they operate under the severely inhibiting paradigm that food is good enough to keep you alive but not sufficiently good enough to keep you healthy or heal you when you are sick.

Most cancer drugs cost in the region of $40,000 per annum per patient. In the US this is payable either by the individual or by their health insurer (assuming they are adequately insured) whereas in the UK this is paid by the NHS (National Health Service). However, whichever way, the fact is that this is the amount paid into the coffers of Big Pharma, per person, per annum and when you consider the number of people worldwide who suffer from and die from cancer each year, I am sure you can do the maths. What incentive is there for any organisation whose first responsibility is always to maintain a profit for its shareholders and owners, to discover a cure? (Turkeys ‘voting for Christmas’ springs readily to mind.) I submit that there is no reason at all and this is the true cause of the utter failure (despite the eloquent hype) of Big Pharma in their self-styled ‘war on cancer.’

We are even deceived by the so-called professionals in such seemingly beneficial activities as ‘cancer screening programmes.’ For example, mammograms, heavily promoted as being an integral part of the early detection of breast cancer, provably achieve nothing other than to irradiate the breast and in many cases actually cause the cancer it is supposed to be detecting.

Most doctors believe not only that what they were taught in medical school must be true, but they also believe that what they were not taught cannot be important and as a result of this are unable to comprehend anything that falls outside of their area of knowledge. Most doctors are still thinking ‘inside the box’ when it comes to cancer and doctors who do think for themselves instead of regarding their learning as gospel and treat the actual cause of disease rather than the symptoms are regarded as ‘quacks’ and are subjected to huge pressure, ridicule and threats to conform. One of the FDA’s modus operandi is to raid the offices of alternative thinkers and practitioners, destroying their medical records and often all their equipment and putting them in jail.

Additionally, some doctors (especially in the US) are afraid of expensive, time-consuming lawsuits and their insurer could well refuse to pay out if they use alternative treatments of any kind. Their medical boards may fine them and even revoke their licence to practice or strike them from the medical register, effectively disbarring them from medical practice forever. Peer pressure is a huge issue too. After all, doctors are only human, and their colleagues will not be slow to publicly ridicule them if they use alternative treatments or are seen to be using or endorsing ‘non-conventional’ medicine.

“Doctors will continue to fail with cancer until they buck the training and accept that a patient is not some collection of malfunctioning cells but a human out of homeostasis. We have cultures alive today who don’t get cancer. No stress, no speed cameras, no mobile phones, no Iraq War. Don’t get me wrong, I truly believe 21st century civilisation has much to commend It, but there are downsides. We’re a toxic society and that includes the medicines. If cancer is striking 1 in 3 of us, that means something is going fundamentally wrong and we’re either going to be honest about it or continue canoeing down that long river in Egypt called De-Nial, splurfing down the ratburgers until the meat wagon comes to collect us.” Philip Day, health researcher

Cancer Research UK spends £170 million, annually, on 3,000 research scientists whose brief is to avoid any research into holistic, naturopathic, nutritional treatments; therapies which provide the ONLY means to successfully treat a cancer victim.

“Using the guise of ‘established’ medical science, many widely accepted studies are disseminated through medical journals and accepted as the ultimate authority by many. In the case of Professor Sheng Wang of Boston University School of Medicine Cancer Research Center, his cancer research was found to be misconducted, fraudulent and contain altered results. What is unsettling is the fact that his research had been previously accepted and used as a cornerstone from which to base all subsequent cancer research.” Andre Evans. Activist Post, 19th October 2011

“The American Cancer Society was founded by the Rockefeller family to act as a propaganda outlet and public relations tool to suck-in money and help promote pharmaceuticals for cancer ‘therapy.’ Gary Null did a fantastic exposé on who and what the ACS is, in a series of articles about 10 years ago and he often retold his experiences on the radio in coming to realise what a fraudulent outfit the ACS actually is. People are simply giving aid and comfort to Big Pharma when they support the ACS.” Ken Adachi, political researcher, May 2011

However, not all studies are fraudulent, but when the motivation for these doctors and professors is financial, it turns the current medical paradigm into a war zone. As a consumer, it is vitally important that you undertake your own research on the harsh side-effects of traditional cancer treatment methods such as chemotherapy.

There is much evidence that there are in existence literally hundreds of alternative cancer treatments which really do work. Some are even of sufficient potency or are fast acting enough to effectively treat a cancer patient who has been deemed to be ‘terminal’ by his/her doctor. As untold millions are pumped into the fake cancer industry that thrives on provably fraudulent research, it is important to remember that free, alternative health options do exist. Utilising natural sweeteners, vitamin D therapy and eliminating artificial sweeteners such as aspartame in its many guises, are extremely simple ways to effectively prevent cancer and potentially begin reversing it. Additionally reducing or eliminating exposure to wireless (microwave) radiation and avoidance of chemical containing personal care and cleaning products are very potent cancer prevention exercises, as all of these exposures have been proven carcinogenic. Even as recently as 2018 the US National Toxicology Program, after a $30m FDA funded decade-long study into the correlation between microwave radiation from regular mobile phone use, found “clear evidence of cancer” from exposure to this form of radiation. (Notably the FDA has thrown out the results stating that ‘animal studies have no bearing on humans,’ even though it was the FDA which requested the animal studies in view of the fact that it is considered scientifically unethical to experiment on humans before testing on animals, and that animal testing for safety of products used by humans is the current scientific standard.)

It is not my intention here to relate those cures to the reader as this is outside the remit of this book. It is obviously desirable that everyone become familiar with a few different working methods of preventing the disease rather than trying to affect a cure at the eleventh hour, so to speak and these preventative and curative strategies are all available in abundance on the Internet. However, even should the worst happen, and you are unfortunately diagnosed with cancer of some kind then it is still not too late to adopt the ‘cure rather than prevention’ approach in 90% of cases and this is true even in cases where traditional cures have been attempted and apparently failed.

The Falsification of Science

John Hamer