To be is to be contingent: nothing of which it can be said that "it is" can be alone and independent. But being is a member of paticca-samuppada as arising which contains ignorance. Being is only invertible by ignorance.

Destruction of ignorance destroys the illusion of being. When ignorance is no more, than consciousness no longer can attribute being (pahoti) at all. But that is not all for when consciousness is predicated of one who has no ignorance than it is no more indicatable (as it was indicated in M Sutta 22)

Nanamoli Thera
Showing posts with label Dubay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dubay. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Are nuclear bombs truly weapons of mass destruction, or are they really just weapons of mass deception?


Footage of alleged nuclear explosions when analyzed with a critical eye reveal undeniable evidence of photo trickery.  In much of the early black and white test footage filmed in the 50s and 60s and shown on newsreels and fear-mongering films, it is clear we are looking at fake model sets complete with miniature houses, vehicles and trees.  Notice the unrealistic and unnatural perfect rows of disproportionally thin trees.  After the flimsy model trees are blown to one side, the film quickly cuts to clips of actual trees in some other location.  Similar to how a stunt double changes with the main actor during the crucial action scene, these clips intersperse or sometimes superimpose footage of models with reality.  The first H-bomb test known as Ivy Mike looks more like some stop motion lava lamps than an explosion.  Many other supposed nuclear tests appear to mix sped up footage of sunrises with real explosions to give the effect of a much bigger blast.  Footage from Operation Dominic appears to show a sunrise with the brightness slider rising in post-production.  Suspiciously, in some videos, the explosions are so violent as to obliterate entire houses in an instant, but yet the camera filming right next to the house survives unscathed and unshook.  The blast often comes from behind the camera, and not as they claim, from a protected location far outside the blast radius.  Someone moves the camera just before and during some of the blasts, and the camera is positioned at an oddly unrealistic height.  What kind of shielded tower would the camera and camera man have to have been enclosed in to survive such a test?  If nuclear bombs actually exist, why would there be a need to fake footage of nuclear explosions?

The Trinity and other nuclear test sites were admittedly first loaded with hundreds or up to a thousand tons of dynamite.  Footage exists showing military men stacking gigantic piles of TNT and dynamite at nuclear testing sites.  The official reason for this was claimed as “comparative purposes,” where the blast from hundreds of tons of stacked TNT would be compared to the nuclear bomb.  With each team sent to separate islands, each stacking piles of explosives but both that told the other island would have the actual bomb, it would be simple to deceive the very men creating the deception.  Mushroom clouds are not unique to so-called nuclear weapons, and can be formed with enough TNT, dynamite, regular bombs, and other explosive materials.  Later supposed nuclear tests like Abel were likely done using very large but traditional bombs and the Baker test done using hundreds of tons of submerged dynamite in a vessel underwater.

Nuclear fission occurs by bombarding uranium 238 with neutrons to split the nucleus and create the isotope uranium 235.  During this split, mass is lost and converted into kinetic energy, which is known as nuclear fission.  If each of those neutrons then goes into another uranium nucleus causing more fission and many more neutrons, this creates a theoretical process known as an explosive nuclear chain reaction.  Enrico Fermi’s famous nuclear chain reaction test was done by stacking massive amounts of graphite and embedding balls of uranium within so that when neutrons started flying through, they would be slowed by the graphite, collide with the uranium, release more neutrons, and then those neutrons would continue in a chain reaction pattern.  This achievement, which was only detectable by a Geiger counter, meant that the fission process could be sustained, but in no way proved the possibility of a nuclear explosive chain reaction. 

In reality, all explosions are gas related.  For an explosive chain reaction to occur, there would need to be an explosive gas created or added.  The byproducts of nuclear fission are 94% heat and 6% radiation.  No gas whatsoever is produced by nuclear fission and so there can be no massive destructive blast.  Furthermore, to achieve intense heat from nuclear fission, millions of atoms need to be split in a chain reaction, which requires a moderator to slow down free neutrons.  No such moderator is included in nuclear bombs, and even if it were, there is no test evidence that even this would result in an explosion. 

Recently declassified minutes of the Manhattan Project’s Interim Committee meeting on May, 31st, 1945 reveal that America had insufficient Uranium to build the Atom bombs supposedly used on Japan just a few months later.  Dr. Compton, director of the Met-Lab at University of Chicago who oversaw production of enriched uranium and plutonium for the bombs was quoted stating it would take another 3 years to produce the amount needed for the bombs, yet just over 3 months later America supposedly successfully produced and deployed two on Japan without being tested. 

Enrico Fermi stated they would need one half to one ton of enriched material to create a nuclear bomb.  Natural Uranium metal contains concentrations of 99% U238, 0.7% U235 and 0.3% U234.  Therefore, to obtain 1 metric ton of U235 you need 142.8 metric tons of natural uranium, and for each metric ton of natural uranium, you need approximately 1000 tons of uranium ore.  Supplies of such uranium ore are certainly not unlimited and especially in the 1940s were in short supply.  The Manhattan Project interim Committee minutes specifically mentioned that even reactor-grade uranium was in short supply and wouldn’t suffice, yet just 3 months later, the bombs were somehow ready and dropped. 

The footage we were shown of the supposed nuclear blasts at Hiroshima and Nagasaki show what appear to be two super-imposed smoke plumes atop one another in an attempt to make the mushroom cloud look larger.  Rather than making the blast look bigger, however, it looks more like some secondary blast began mid-air.  The footage of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki explosions look very different from the many other test examples shown previously, each of which also looked very different from one another. 

In reality Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed just like Tokyo and many other Japanese cities.  When footage of the aftermath is analyzed, it is clear that the destruction is consistent with traditional carpet bombing and not from a single nuclear explosion.  If the damage shown in footage from the aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was actually from these nuclear bombs, there would be a single central circular blast radius showing the most destruction at the center-point with gradually less expanding outwards.  The debris and direction of destruction should all face outwards from this central location, and there should be an obvious blast crater at the site of impact. 

In World War II propaganda films, you can see footage of scientists pointing to the exact spot where the nuclear bomb supposedly landed in Hiroshima, yet the area looks no different than any other and has no discernable blast crater.  The damage immediately around the point of impact is no worse or more pronounced than anywhere else.  The destruction found throughout the two cities is in fact consistent with traditional fire-bombing, with all smaller wooden buildings decimated and only a few larger stone and reinforced concrete structures still standing. The propaganda films claim to show buildings with windows blown in one side and out the other, or Hiroshima bridge having the paint burnt off only one side, but these examples are clearly cherry-picked to give the illusion of a single blast, when the overall destruction is similar to every other fire-bombed Japanese city.

There is also no evidence of long-term radiation damage anywhere in Hiroshima or Nagasaki.  According to the experts, there was to be radiation and nuclear fallout for thousands of years affecting people, plants, animals and every living thing in the vicinity, causing generational deformities and a veritable death zone.  In reality, however, flowers, grass and other plants started growing back within a month and radiation levels have dropped in both cities recovering to normality within years.  Hiroshima and Nagasaki are now bustling modern cities, 80 years later, with no remnant of nuclear destruction.  The people there are not all born with deformities or chronic ailments, and there is no dangerous radiation or fallout to beware.  Radiation exists and remains present in an area after any and every explosion, not just supposed nuclear ones.  So, if you drop a bunch of bombs or blast a ton of dynamite and bring a Geiger counter, you will certainly register radiation, but it will not linger for centuries or millennia like nuclear radiation is claimed to do. 

As for the explosions which occurred at nuclear power plants like Chernobyl and Fukushima, these were gas explosions caused by the buildup of hydrogen, and not nuclear explosions.  In fact, it is impossible for a nuclear explosion to occur at a nuclear power plant, only gas explosions.  Today in Fukushima you get more radiation from the back-scatter scanners at the airport security gates than you do from their so-called nuclear disaster.  The way nuclear power works is essentially just using hot radioactive material to boil water and generate steam which drives turbines and creates electricity.  One of the leading nuclear physicists in America, Galen Winsor, who was responsible for helping set-up most of America’s nuclear power plants, was a vocal whistle-blower on this subject.  He said nuclear power is really just the cleanest and most economical way boil water, and that all nuclear power plants are essentially and practically just steam power plants. 

In his lecture tours he gave all across the country, Galen Winsor would talk about how he and other early nuclear physicists would regularly hold uranium, plutonium and radioactive waste with their bare hands without any ill effects.  He quipped about taking swims in the nuclear waste pools to prove they weren’t hazardous, and when his colleagues refused to believe him, he began drinking a glass of water from the pools in front of them every day.  In footage from his lectures, you can watch Galen open a tiny canister of radioactive material, supposedly dangerous enough to cause an EPA disaster area one mile in radius, contaminating everyone in the building.  He holds it in his bare hands, runs a Geiger counter over it which registers off the scale, licks all the radioactive material onto his tongue, tests it with the Geiger counter again, and swallows it.  Galen Winsor did this demonstration for years with no ill effects and lived into his 80s. 

After trying to blow the whistle with his lecture tours, the government confiscated his nuclear material, sent the SWAT team to his house, and began harassing him legally.  He was quoted saying: “There is no such thing as nuclear waste, only material created in a nuclear reactor to be recovered and used beneficially.  High level waste is radioactive and self-heating and so re-usable uranium fuel fits that definition, but if you disregard its intrinsic worth, then it would fit the definition of high-level waste.  But let’s say there is no high level waste and only material to be recovered and used beneficially.  Then what’s the low-level waste fiasco?  That’s an excuse for a federally mandated non-inspectable disposal system so that organized crime can get rid of any evidence they want and it can never be dug up again.”

There are allegedly stainless-steel containers buried in concrete under the ocean boiling with hot radioactive material for 2000 years.  The production, storage, transportation and disposal of nuclear materials is incredibly expensive and secretive.  Protocols for dealing with nuclear waste materials involve allegedly burying it deep into Earth’s bedrock through such extensive, expensive procedures.  In reality, as Galen Winsor showed, these nuclear materials are not nearly as hazardous or toxic as they are made out to be, and the over-the-top, secretive disposal methods likely double as black-budget, black-op covers.  It provides the Military Industrial complex a never-ending blank check for themselves to dip into tax payer money.  At many times during the nuclear arms race, America spent upwards of 50 million dollars per day on nuclear weapons related expenses, nearly rivaling NASA’s huge budget. 

It is no doubt that incredibly high-powered ballistics, bombs and missiles all exist, but the specific claim of nuclear weapons and nuclear explosions, which require fission, a nuclear chain reaction, and result in destruction on a scale far beyond conventional weaponry, is patently false.  Nuclear fission simply does not produce any kind of gas necessary for such an explosion, and no moderator to slow down free neutrons is included in nuclear weapons.  Declassified documents suggest the American government was years from having enough U235 to produce the bombs allegedly dropped on Japan.  Film analysis of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and nuclear test footage show countless anomalies pointing towards photo trickery and deceptive wartime propaganda.  Radiation levels quickly dropped and the destruction attributed to two nuclear explosions looked no different from the neighboring towns and cities destroyed by aerial fire-bombing runs.  The stories of the Little Boy and Fat Man bombs were just the myths necessary to create the scare-mongering cold-war arms race that would soon begin.  The threat of any nation being able to push a button and destroy entire cities or countries is a perfect terrifying excuse for America to enter and make war with anyone that supposedly harbors or develops nuclear weapons.  Since the early tests, alleged nuclear explosions have continued to get larger and larger, while the payload continues getting smaller and smaller, to the point we are now supposed to believe they can be carried in a suitcase.  Teaching generations of children to duck and cover hiding under their desks has now instilled fear of a boogeyman just as bogus as the one under their beds.

Eric Dubay 
https://ericdubay.wordpress.com/

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Before the first Apollo mission ever even cleared the launch pad, eleven NASA astronauts died in highly suspicious “accidents.”

 Bill Kaysing, another Moon hoax researcher, worked at Rocketdyne where NASA Saturn V rocket engines were built and became exposed to documents pertaining to the Mercury, Gemini, Atlas and Apollo NASA programs, which proved trickery was afoot.  Kaysing said of the documents that, “one does not need an engineering or science degree to determine that a hoax was being perpetrated.”  He wrote a book about his findings called “We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle.”  In it he exposes how NASA staged both the Apollo 1 fire and Challenger “accident” deliberately murdering the astronauts on board to silence them.

Before the first Apollo mission ever even cleared the launch pad, eleven NASA astronauts died in highly suspicious “accidents.”  Gus Grissom, Roger Chaffee and Ed White were all cremated together in an Apollo capsule fire during a completely unnecessary and dangerous test where they were strapped down and locked into a 100% oxygen chamber which incinerated the three of them to death in seconds.  Seven other astronauts, Ted Freemen, Charles Basset, Elliot See, Russell Rogers, Clifton Williams, Michael Adams and Robert Lawrence died in six separate airplane crashes, and Ed Givens in a car crash!  Eight of these deaths were in 1967 alone.  So many astronauts coincidentally dying under such circumstances is highly unlikely, and lends credence to the idea that these were intentional hits by the Masons trying to find the right people to sell their hoax.

One of the most outspoken of the fallen astronauts was Gus Grissom.   By 1967 Grissom had become increasingly irritated and vocally negative about NASA’s chances of ever landing man on the Moon.  He stated the odds were “pretty slim” and famously hung a lemon on the Apollo capsule after it repeatedly failed safety testing procedures.  Grissom threatened to go public with his complaints about the LEM, and even told his wife Betty, “If there ever is a serious accident in the space program, it’s likely to be me.”  Right after his murder, government agents raided Grissom’s house before anyone had been informed about the fire or his death.  They removed all his personal papers and his diary, never to be returned.

“In a prosecutorial mode, I accuse NASA, the CIA, and whatever super-secret group that controls the shadow government of these United States of fraud on the grandest scale imaginable, of murder by arson, and of larceny of over $40 billion in conjunction with the Apollo program that allegedly landed men on the Moon.  I also accuse them of violating a federal law against lobbying by government-funded entities and of serial murder of low-level NASA employees, witnesses, and other citizens who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Such accusations seem incredible because none of us ever want to believe our governmental father is deceiving us.  However, by the end of this book, even the most trusting reader will have no doubt that NASA MOONED AMERICA!”  -Ralph Rene, “NASA Mooned America!”

In 2001, investigative journalist and award-winning filmmaker Bart Sibrel produced the excellent documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon.” When requesting footage for his movie, Sibrel was sent either by mistake or by a well-meaning whistle-blower, an official raw slated NASA clip from the Apollo 11 mission showing a young Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins, for almost an hour, using transparencies and camera-tricks to fake shots of a round Earth!  They communicate over audio with control in Houston about how to accurately stage the shot, and someone keeps prompting them on how to effectively manipulate the camera to achieve the desired effect.  First, they blacked out all the windows except for a downward facing circular one, which they aimed the camera towards from several feet away.  This created the illusion of a ball-shaped Earth surrounded by the blackness of space, when in fact it was simply a round window in their dark cabin.  Neil Armstrong claimed at this point to be 130,000 miles from Earth, half-way to the Moon, but when camera-tricks were finished the viewer could see for themselves the astro-nots were not more than a hundred miles above the Earth’s surface, likely flying in a high-altitude plane!

“Many gullible people still accept NASA’s claim of sending men to the Moon, without bothering to carry out any research, or investigation, to see if NASA are indeed telling the truth.  There are some who will never accept the Moon missions were faked, regardless of how much factual evidence of a fake is put before them.”  -Sam Colby, “N.A.S.A. Numerous Anomalies and Scams Abound”

In 2004, Bart Sibrel completed a second documentary entitled “Astronauts Gone Wild” where he set out to film interviews with Apollo astronauts and ask them to swear on the Bible that they walked on the Moon.  In reaction to Sibrel’s accusations many of the astronauts indeed “went wild.”  John Young of Apollo 10 and 16 threatened to “knock him in the head,” then ran away into a nearby closing elevator.  Ed Mitchell of Apollo 14 literally kicked him out the door and threatened to shoot him!  Buzz Aldrin punched him square in the face!  The documentary is a fascinating psychological study, watching the astronauts repeatedly squirm and quickly escalate to threats and violence; they behave more like pathological liars than honorable cosmonauts.  Many of them have battled depression and alcoholism since “returning from the Moon” as well. 

Buzz Aldrin was once asked at a NASA banquet what it felt like to first step onto the lunar surface.  He staggered to his feet speechless then left crying uncontrollably.   On the 25th anniversary event for the Apollo 11 landing, one of the few interview appearances Armstrong ever made, he gave a cryptic speech basically telling the young people in attendance that there were many truths about Apollo they could uncover if they dug deep enough!  He said holding tears back, “Today we have with us a group of young students, America’s best.  To you we say we have only completed a beginning.  We leave you much that is undone.  There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truth’s protective layers.”

Eric Dubay 

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy