Vaccination - Is There A Conspiracy?

 

Part I: WAR ON INFANTS

The history of vaccination is littered with so many inaccuracies – and doctoring of medical records – that it is sometimes hard to sift fact from fiction. No matter how much has been written or spoken about the efficacy of vaccination, the truth is that there is absolutely no proof that vaccines work.

Later in this book, we shall discuss the absolute lack of scientific studies to prove that vaccination theory is founded on sound scientific principles. Suffice to argue for the time being that if it indeed were, the medical establishment would not need to distort figures and present selective data to prove that vaccines are effective.

Alternatively, a theory founded on scientific fact does not need propagandists as it speaks for itself.

So who benefits from brainwashing the public with such untruths? What are they trying to hide? What are their ulterior motives? Just how do they achieve their devious ends?

1. Modern-Day Pogrom?

 As we debate these ethical and moral issues, we shall also take a look at the often-lethal consequences of these unconscionable actions. Not surprisingly, some researchers and anti-vaccination campaigners go so far as to compare immunization campaigns to Nazi ‘pogroms’.

Why else would Western public health agencies thrust a polio vaccine on Uganda when the African country did not have a history of the disease? (More on this in Part III: All The World’s A Lab). If the anti-vaccine camp has been accused of exaggeration and paranoia, their beliefs seem to gain credibility as you delve into the details. With increasing awareness and access to information, thanks to tools the Internet and other technologies have given us, evidence is piling up, for instance, to make a convincing case that AIDS was deliberately introduced to Africa by Western governments.

What better way to control entire nations than by keeping them sick, weak, impoverished and at the mercy of donors?

There are powerful material benefits to controlling entire nations, not least of which are their abundant natural resources like oil. Is it too farfetched to believe that vaccination is being used as a deliberate means to manipulate, scare and even kill people in nations where lack of literacy subdues the will of the people and discourages them from asking ‘awkward’ questions?

When the Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) was introduced to Nigeria in 2002, Muslim clerics rallied the population to revolt. The campaign was born of skepticism of Western nations and their motives.

Whether justified or not, there were suspicions that the OPV contained infertility agents targeted at Nigeria’s Muslim population. Some reminded UNICEF, which was spearheading the polio immunization campaign in Nigeria, of the horrific clinical trials conducted by American drug giant Pfizer in 1996.

The Nigerian government has since sued the company, which was then experimenting with an antibiotic drug called Trovan. The drug was administered to 233 Nigerian children with bacterial meningitis during an epidemic. During the clinical trials, 196 children died and the remaining 37 children suffered debilitating health problems including paralysis and brain damage.

The third reason the Nigerian population was outraged by UNICEF’s polio vaccination campaign was the accusation that the Western world, through agencies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and other global non-profit bodies, had deliberately introduced HIV to Africa in the 1950s through the polio vaccine. The vaccine was administered to a million people in what is now Rwanda and Burundi, where the earliest cases of HIV in Africa were later detected.

Whether true or not, there is widespread skepticism in several quarters regarding mass immunization campaigns and the seemingly altruistic intentions of international public health and aid agencies and their motives. Is it all conjecture? (More on this in Part III: All The World’s A Lab and Chapter 4: Critical Mass)

2. Who Stands To Gain?

 All this suggests a medical conspiracy of sorts, involving the pharmaceutical industry, the medical establishment, health regulators and policy-makers. If this were true, what’s in it for these vested interests?

The truth is more layered than is immediately apparent. While only some – a core group – can be accused of consciously and deliberately plotting the murder of innocent children and adults, there are many who collude unwittingly.

At the core of the vaccine cartel are pharma companies, senior members of the medical fraternity, policy makers and health regulators. Drug companies earn billions of dollars a year from the sale of vaccines and research grants while politicians have their own ulterior motives.

But, pray, why would someone as lowly in the pecking order as, say, a general practitioner, push the same agenda? Surely, he or she can’t be in on a global conspiracy?

Let me put it this way. Why are diseases that result from vaccination misdiagnosed so very often? Is there a deliberate attempt to cover up the truth? What has the doctor to gain by hoodwinking a child and his or her parents?

When a doctor brought up in the fine traditions of allopathic medicine is confronted by glaring discrepancies, it is a natural tendency to rationalize the truth. That is, if a doctor is confronted with a patient who displays symptoms of, say, polio, and he knows the patient has been vaccinated against the disease, he would rather misdiagnose the symptoms than acknowledge that the vaccine did not work, or even worse, that the vaccine actually caused the disease.

Why would doctors stake their reputation and fundamental beliefs on a system of medicine by questioning the very basis of their life’s work? Unconsciously or not, generation upon generation of medical practitioners and specialists have thus, and in many other ways, pushed the cause of vaccination. They were simply raised to do so during years of academic study.

Others may indulge in pro-vaccination propaganda and even fudge clinical data to secure coveted and lucrative research grants and fellowships, public recognition and awards.

Just as the motives are many, the players in this dangerous game of smoke and mirrors are also many. But the objective is always the same: to conceal the truth from the public.

It is a closed system that works on many levels, a system that has worked perfectly for the last 200 years since Edward Jenner ‘developed’ the smallpox vaccine, also touted as the world’s first ‘successful’ vaccine. (The modern version, Dryvax made by Wyeth Laboratories, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1931)

3. An Ignorant Public

 But a system such as this works only if we buy into it. And we have. The most oft-used tactic used by the vaccine lobby is fear. Leveraging this primal human emotion and burned into public consciousness is the fear of ‘dire consequences’ (read death) if we don’t vaccinate our children, ourselves and even our pets!

It is a message that comes to us through subtle and blatant advertising paid for by pharma dollars to perpetuate the myth that vaccines protect our health and save human lives.

Mass hysteria is another extremely effective tool, witnessed most recently during the 2009 swine-flu outbreak and before that the SARS outbreak in 2002. This pandemic of fear, fuelled by an overzealous media, enabled the vaccination of millions of willing and unwilling victims across many continents.

What were in those vaccines? Were researches using the hysteria to test unknown strains of viruses and chemical additives? Was the global pandemic deliberately engineered? (See Chapter 7: Swine Flu: The Pandemic That Didn’t Pan Out)

Another weapon to brainwash a willing public is the media, which sold out to corporate pharma decades ago. How often we read about the “successful” results of public health agencies such as the WHO every time an immunization campaign is conducted! Such propaganda serves only to reinforce the so-called life-saving nature of these lethal cocktails. How often do we read about wonder drugs written about by a media whose owners often have close ties to Big Pharma?

Finally, public ignorance has also helped perpetuate the notion that vaccination is a rite of passage that every child must undergo in the first few weeks of their lives. The brainwashing (regarding the benefits of vaccination) begins in the maternity ward. It continues in school, and as we grow up, we are bombarded with public service messages on the need for immunization.

It’s a crafty tool as education and public service messages are ‘positive’ and do not create resistance. They effectively create a certain mindset, which makes the public easily vulnerable to other tactics such as fear and mass hysteria.

Finally, the human tendency for quick-fix solutions and an easy way out completes the cycle of brainwashing. For most people, it’s easier to submit to a couple of jabs than live a healthy lifestyle and boost one’s immune system the way nature intended.

Living healthy is often hard work, considering the way modern lifestyles are designed. But instead of investing in healthy nutrition, adopting healthy sleeping habits, exercising, and spending time in the sun to make us immune against most diseases, we prefer to vaccinate ourselves and our children.

How easy it is to turn an untruth into sound scientific theory – in the case of vaccines, it’s taken just 200 years.

4. Sudden Death

 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome or SIDS is a convenient term the medical establishment has coined to describe deaths in infants resulting from an inconclusive diagnosis. It is a convenient term that conceals the number of infants who actually die of adverse reactions to vaccination.

The only official estimate comes from the Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System or VAERS cell sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS records the reports of vaccine-related reactions as well as deaths in infants submitted by the public and doctors when vaccination goes wrong. However, few are aware of VAERS and few doctors use the system. Here is a quote from the VAERS website:

“More than 10 million vaccines per year are given to children less than 1 year old, usually between 2 and 6 months of age. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence. These coincidences make it difficult to know whether a particular adverse event resulted from a medical condition or from a vaccination. Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.”

VAERS’s statistics reveal that on average, doctors in the US report 11,000 cases of serious vaccine-related events every year. Of this, 1 percent of infants die after being vaccinated. That’s approximately 100 children a year.

If these figures appear low, consider the FDA’s own estimates – that doctors report only 10 percent of vaccine-related serious adverse reactions (hospitalization, life-threatening illnesses and permanent disability) to VAERS. Hence, the number of infant deaths reported every year – approximately 100 – is actually infinitesimal.

No matter how much the medical community cloaks the truth, researchers agree that SIDS is linked to vaccination. According to one independent study, the number of SIDS cases in the US is greatest in infants aged two to four months, which is when babies receive the first round of vaccines. Other studies have found a three-week lag between vaccination and death.

While none of these studies can conclusively state that vaccines killed these infants, it is difficult to draw any other conclusion considering the weight of research that correlates the two variables. You may also recall that in countries like Iceland where children receive less than a third of the number of vaccines given to children in the United States, the death rate is also 50 percent lower.

Interestingly – and alarmingly – VAERS data reveals that a large portion of the reported “adverse events” pertain to vaccines for pertussis or whooping cough, a disease routinely ‘taken care of’ by the DPT vaccine (Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus). Independent studies state that children die eight times faster than normal after a DPT shot.

Considering the extent of underreporting to VAERS, it is difficult to estimate how many individuals are seriously disabled by vaccination. One estimate, quoted during a lawsuit, claimed that one in every 300 DPT immunizations causes seizures.

It was in response to widespread concerns over the DPT vaccine that the US Federal Government set up the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, loosely called the ‘Vaccine Court’, to settle claims against vaccine manufacturers in cases of adverse reactions to their drugs.

Since the NVICP was set up in 1998, it has received 5,000-odd claims including 700 pertaining to vaccine-linked deaths. The total sum awarded in compensation to date is $724 million.

5. Early Assault

 Despite the overwhelming evidence that vaccines are not safe and that there is no conclusive evidence that they protect us from disease, we consent to allow these harmful chemicals to be pumped into our children.

On the contrary, there is a growing body evidence to suggest that vaccines may, in fact, thwart a child’s immune system from developing normally. For instance, doctors have found that individuals who have not suffered a bout of measles in childhood are more prone than those who have, to skin diseases, diseases of bone and cartilage, and certain types of tumors. It has also been found that individuals who do not contract mumps are more prone to developing ovarian cancer.

Some researchers believe that the viral genetic material in the chickenpox vaccine may surface years after vaccination in the form of herpes zoster or shingles or other disorders of the immune system.

Confirmation of this trend is seen in the increase of adult shingles by 90 percent from 1998 to 2003, following the release of the chickenpox vaccine for mass use. Shingles is linked with three times as many deaths and five times as many hospitalizations as chickenpox.

Chickenpox has never been a serious illness, at least until 1995 when the live virus chickenpox vaccine was licensed in the United States and mass vaccination began. Before and even now, for 99.9 percent of healthy children, chickenpox is a mild disease without complications. Children who have chickenpox by age six develop a natural, long-lasting immunity to it.

After Merck developed and distributed the chickenpox vaccine in 1995, chickenpox was suddenly declared a life-threatening disease for which children must get vaccinated or face serious health problems!

By vaccinating and thereby preventing children to develop natural immunity to chickenpox, we are now facing a new epidemic of adults getting shingles. Chickenpox is caused by the varicella zoster virus, which is a member of the herpes virus family and is associated with herpes zoster (shingles).

After recovering from chickenpox, the virus can remain dormant in the body’s nerve roots for many years, unless it is reactivated. Physical or emotional stress and exertion are among the most common activators. When awakened, the symptoms present themselves as shingles rather than chickenpox.

Nature creates chickenpox to strengthen natural immunity and prevent shingles. Children who go through the disease naturally and later come into contact with other children recovering from it receive a natural immune booster which helps them to stay protected from contracting shingles later in life. In other words, by not allowing chickenpox to occur in the population of children, we are risking an epidemic of shingles among the population of adults. We have been taught to stay away from people who are infected with chickenpox. In truth, if you have already had chickenpox in the past, coming in contact with someone who has chickenpox actually serves as a further ‘booster vaccine’ to help avoid shingles, regardless your age.

Since the mass-introduction of the chickenpox vaccine, there is just not enough chickenpox around to keep providing natural immune boosters to children and adults. Hence the man-made escalation of shingles among adults.

Shingles, marked by pain and a blister-like rash on one side of the body lasting three to five weeks, does not typically lead to serious complications. However, in persons with a weak immune system (which happens after being vaccinated), complications may be serious and even life-threatening. These include postherpetic neuralgia, bacterial skin infections, Hutchinson’s sign, Ramsay Hunt Syndrome, motor neuropathy, meningitis, hearing loss, blindness, and bladder impairment.

As it often happens, the short-term benefits achieved through the silver-bullet approaches of medical intervention, actually lead to irreparable disasters in the long-term. Accordingly, we may have achieved a decline of chickenpox (mild illness) among children through mass vaccination, while having generated a near-equal increase of shingles (severe illness) among adults.

Please note that the chickenpox vaccine may only provide temporary, superficial immunity, whereas recovering from chickenpox bestows long-lasting superior immunity. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “The effectiveness of the vaccine is 44 percent against disease of any severity and 86 percent against moderate or severe disease.” I am not sure how they can know this for sure, especially since their estimates underwent major revisions in recent years.

Investigations of a recent chickenpox outbreak in a New Hampshire daycare revealed that it began with a child who had previously been vaccinated. And as reported by the Washington Post, in another outbreak, 75 percent of the affected children had been vaccinated against chickenpox.

It also helps that most 10-year-old children are naturally immune to chickenpox even though they have not gone through the illness. A Canadian study involving over 2,000 school children found that 63 percent of youngsters with no history of chickenpox had antibodies against the virus. It is presumed that they had a very mild case of chickenpox, which produced no symptoms at all, or just a runny nose and a mild rash. In fact, most infections (of any kind) are uneventful, and we will never know that we were infected. In other words, it is very beneficial for children to hang out with other children who are recovering from chickenpox.

Of course, the same principle works for adults. Researchers at Britain’s Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS) found that adults living with children enjoy higher levels of protection from shingles.

We must remember that we have a smart immune system that doesn’t require us to fall ill to become immune to most illnesses. Just breast-feeding for at least one year is known to bestow children with the most effective immune system there can be.

In any case, it may be a blessing that the chickenpox vaccine is as ineffective as it appears to be. This may actually prevent an even more serious shingles epidemic than is already in the making. However, this blessing in disguise may be short-lived. The drug giant Merck has already developed a shingles vaccine (Zostavax) to help foil the escalating shingles epidemic which it helped to create by disseminating its chickenpox vaccine. Approved by the FDA in 2006, the vaccine is being targeted at people age 60 and older, at the cost of $200 a shot, and regardless whether these older folks are already immune-compromised or suffer from another illness such as cancer. For the medical industry it’s just another clever marketing scheme. First, they cause the problem and then they offer their help in fixing it. The fix, in turn, causes even more health problems, which then require new fixes. And so the medical Ponzi scheme continues to grow exponentially.

The main question here is whether it is worth risking the health or life of your children, now or in the future, for no real benefit at all. Consider the following adverse events that may accompany chickenpox vaccination:

According to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), between March 1995 and July 1998, one in 1,481 chickenpox vaccinations were followed by an adverse health event.

Among the adverse events, about 1 in 33,000 doses involved serious complications such as shock, encephalitis (brain inflammation), thrombocytopenia (a blood disorder) cellulitis, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and shingles.

Fourteen out of the reported 6,574 chickenpox vaccine adverse events ended in death.

Given the fact that adverse vaccine events are notoriously underreported – by as much as 90 percent – the more probable 140 deaths instead of the reported 14 cases should caution every parent and doctor about such a risky vaccination program.

The risk may be even greater when the vaccine is combined with other vaccines, like MMR, which was confirmed by Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). She said: “We have been getting reports from parents that their children are suffering high fevers, chickenpox lesions, shingles, brain damage and dying after chickenpox vaccination, especially when the vaccine is given at the same time with MMR and other vaccines.”

The bottom line is, vaccination offers no advantage over non-vaccination. Vaccination only helps to further increase the incidence of disease and thereby generates an endless requirement for medical attention, which in turn benefits those who make money off the unsuspecting population.

This brings us back to the issue of natural immunity versus acquired immunity discussed in Chapter 1: The Vaccine Myth. In other words, childhood infectious diseases gift the body with a natural immunity that vaccines purport to artificially induce, but in vain.

The fact is that we are assaulted by pathogens – bacteria, viruses, amoeba, etc – every single day but do not succumb to the infectious diseases that these germs are alleged to produce. This is solely due to the body’s immune system and other natural filters that continuously and tirelessly kill and weed out non-beneficial germs and debris every single day of our lives. Individuals whose immune system has been compromised and who are unable able to keep their insides clean require an invasion and proliferation of germs to help detoxify their bodies for them.

The immune system consists primarily of white blood cells, antibodies and the lymphatic system. White blood cells and lymph circulate throughout our organs, tissues and cells while simultaneously cleansing them of cellular debris, toxins and naturalizing pathogens along the way.

That’s not all. The immune system is beautifully layered and operates at various levels. It is also composed of various lines of defense that a pathogen must encounter so that it can effectively deal with the pathogen. In other words, the body uses multiple filters while screening for pathogens to make sure anything that is harmful perishes before it can cause an infection, unless, of course, an infection becomes warranted and the body allows it.

What are these various ‘filters’? In addition to the already mentioned mucus lining along the body’s orifices, saliva protects against germs and our skin serves as armor for our internal organs. The liver is the body’s supreme filter and purifier, and cleanses the blood of all types of toxic waste including chemicals and by-products from drugs as the blood passes through the organ.

Then there are the excretory organs such as the kidneys and the large intestine and bowels to get rid of solid waste. When you breathe out, the air you exhale too contains cellular waste just as your perspiration does.

The fact is that in order to create natural and real immunity to disease, a pathogen must provoke the complete inflammatory and immune response. This is a complex response that resonates throughout the body’s equally complex immune system. When this happens naturally, the body acquires life-long immunity to a particular germ.

But for this to happen, the pathogen must pass through natural channels, from outside to inside. For instance, the pathogen must pass from the respiratory system or through the saliva or skin and then to the other organs involved in filtering it out such as the mucus membranes, thymus, liver and spleen.

Vaccines do not do this. Instead, they completely bypass the outside-to-inside process by being directly injected, thereby failing to provoke the full immune response.

By injecting a live but attenuated virus, parts of a virus or a dead virus, vaccines trick the immune system into releasing antibodies against a particular pathogen. This shortcut, as it were, is what vaccine theory is based on and is seriously flawed.

For instance, it was only later discovered that the immune system is composed of two parts. While one part is active, it suppresses the other part and vice-versa. Artificially stimulating one part of the system to produce antibodies abnormally inhibits the other part of the system and thus throws the entire immunological response out of gear.

One of the major repercussions of this is that the body sometimes begins to produce antibodies that attack its own cells, thus creating an autoimmune disease. At least that’s the theory behind such autoimmune disorders; but I will offer a slightly different explanation below. The organ that is affected depends on which tissues are attacked by the antibodies.

For instance, when the brain and spinal cord are attacked, the individual develops vaccine-induced encephalitis. This in turn leads to a number of diseases including Guillain-Barré Syndrome and other neurological diseases that often manifest themselves in behavioral symptoms.

Is it pure coincidence that the incidence of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, minimal brain disorder, autism and subacute lupus erythematosus has increased dramatically as the medical establishment recommends multiple-vaccine immunization?

Indeed there are other factors that cause autoimmune diseases but some researchers are unequivocal that vaccines are also responsible. In my opinion, it is not the antigen itself, but the foreign protein particles and chemical additives in the vaccines, such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, body parts containing foreign DNA, and squalene that produce the same response.

Once this toxic sludge is injected directly into the blood, it will inevitably make its way into the brain, spleen, kidneys, liver, joint fluids, blood vessel walls, lymph vessels and connective tissues of intestines, lungs, breasts and other parts. The multiple tissue damage caused by these toxins requires a continuous and significant healing response by the body that includes the production of antibodies. As already mentioned, the body uses antibodies to heal damaged tissue and neutralize accumulated harmful toxic substances. To successfully detoxify and heal the affected tissues, antibodies and other cells of the immune system must inflame them first.

An overreaction of the immune system may occur when the body becomes overwhelmed with the sudden appearance of unnatural, toxic substances in the blood such as mercury and antibiotics. Modern medicine conveniently calls such a healing attempt autoimmune disease, meaning, the body attacks itself. In truth, the body has no intention to commit suicide.

Let us now see how vaccines contaminate the immune system and why they throw it off-balance. Most vaccines are ‘live’ vaccines i.e. they contain the intended virus, which is weakened so that it doesn’t produce full-blown symptoms of disease, before it is introduced into the human body.

Before that, the virus must be ‘cultured’ or grown artificially while being fed on nutrient-rich substances such as aborted human fetuses, chick embryos, pig embryonic tissues, and monkey kidney cells.

Can you imagine how putrid this ‘culture’ must be? The next step is to remove the impurities and isolate the virus by subjecting it to a series of complex chemical processes.

When the attenuated or weakened virus is introduced into the human body, the body by reflex attempts to neutralize the intruder and produces a greater amount of antibodies in the process. This is a violent biochemical reaction as under normal circumstances, viruses rarely if ever enter the body directly through the bloodstream.

Yet, vaccines contain chemical additives called adjuvants to exaggerate the initial immune response. They also contain chemical fixers to stop the immune system from altogether destroying the antigen. Destroying the viral material would defeat the very purpose of the vaccine, right? Next, preservatives are added to the vaccine to prevent it from putrefying and to create shelf-life.

Among the chemical additives in vaccines are monosodium glutamate, thimerosal (mercury), antibiotics, anti-freeze and other acidic and toxic compounds.

Children are the most vulnerable section of the population because their immune systems are practically defenseless against these poisons. They have a lot against them since most mothers were once vaccinated and hence fail to pass on their own natural immunity to them through breast milk.

More evidence that vaccines are lethal to children comes from James R Shannon of the National Institutes of Health. He said, “No vaccination can be proven safe before it is given to children.”

A new life, whose immune system is already compromised, cannot effectively cope with such a genetic and chemical assault. According to an Australian study, children who received the pertussis vaccine were five times more likely to contract encephalitis from the vaccine than developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis through natural means.

Also, when babies are immunized, there is no regard for the infant’s unique biochemical make-up. Since babies scarcely have a medical ‘history’, there is no way to tell what medical vulnerabilities the infant might have. For example, a prematurely born child is typically not as healthy as one that was born at full-term.

Still, vaccines are administered regardless of individual differences (the same applies to older children and adults). It’s a one-dose-fits-all policy. Also, doses are not varied with body weight and other variables.

As soon as the vaccine is administered, the infant’s body musters all its strength to eliminate it. If the child is biologically sensitive or weak, the vaccine may pass through the crucial blood-brain barrier and damage the brain’s cells. Autism is just one of the many debilitating neurological consequences of vaccination.

In the section that follows, we shall further explore how vaccines declare an all-out war against the human immune system.

Vaccine-nation Poisoning the Population,

One Shot at a Time

Andreas Moritz