A Judas Goat

 “A Judas Goat is a term used to describe a trained goat used at a slaughterhouse and in general animal herding.The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them to a specific destination.

“In stockyards,a Judas goat will lead sheep to slaughter, while its own life is spared.Judas goats are also used to lead other animals to specific pens and onto trucks.The term Judas Goat is derived from a biblical reference to Judas Iscariot [who betrayed Jesus Christ to the Pharisees].

“The phrase has also been used to describe a goat that is used to find feral goats that are targeted for eradication.The Judas Goat is outfitted with a transmitter, painted red and then released.The goat then finds the remaining herds of wild goats,allowing hunters to exterminate them.

—From Wikipedia, the Internet encyclopedia.

“...Lambs were being led by a Judas goat into the chute.Two workers stood at the end, jolting the animals with enough electricity to render them brain dead. In an instant, prongs at the sheep's brains and in the fleece near their hearts delivered a zap that collapsed them, after which they were handed through . . . to the kill floor. The Judas goats . . . then returned to the pens, where they collected another batch of sheep. ” —From: “A Slaughter House Tour” at karlschatz.com

***
“Controlled Opposition” The Soviet “Trust” Model for Infiltration and Manipulation —Even the Actual Creation—of Opposing Forces:
Utilized Today in America by The Enemy Within The early 20th century so-called "Trust" model utilized by the Soviet Union to infiltrate and destroy its enemies is the foundation for the very techniques often used both by American intelligence agen-cies—along with Israel’s clandestine service, Mossad and its conduits such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith—to infiltrate and destroy (or otherwise control the activities of) domestic dissident move-ments deemed hostile to the interests of Zionism and Globalism.
Those who fail to understand this age-old tactic will never be able to fathom the extent to which the American political system has been manipulated by these alien forces.
Although—even today—there are persons and organizations active within the so-called “nationalist” and “revisionist” and “patriotic” move-ments in America, who seem to “say the right things, ” the truth is that many of those in question are actually witting—sometimes unwitting— agents of discord,being used for the purposes of intelligence gathering, propaganda and disinformation, all designed to establish further influ-ence upon the American system for the purpose of consolidating the power of The Enemy Within.
Let us examine the Soviet “Trust” and how it operated.This little-known counterintelligence operation known as "the Trust" was estab-lished by the Cheka, the predecessor to the Soviet KGB, as a means through which to set up and control a "phony opposition" in order to flush out genuine opponents of the Bolshevik regime which, as histori-ans know, was under the control of non-Russians—mostly Jews.
When reading the following materials relating to the workings of the "Trust," simply substitute the word "Israeli" for the word "Soviet" and the word "Mossad" for the names "Cheka" and "KGB" and you will under-stand how the "Trust" technique has been applied by the Mossad, in manipulating groups that “seem” to be opposing Israeli interests.
(Likewise, a similar formula can be used substituting the terms “CIA” or “FBI” as it may be appropriate.) A brief description of the operation of "The Trust" appears in Chekisty:A History of the KGB by John J. Dziak:
Where no genuine internal opposition organization exists [a security service might] invent one—both to infil-trate the more dangerous . . . organizations abroad in order to blunt or channel their actions, and to surface real or potential internal dissidents. If an internal opposition already exists, it will be infiltrated in an attempt to control it, to provoke opponents into exposing themselves, and to cause the movement to serve state interests.
A more comprehensive account of "The Trust" appears in Dirty Tricks or Trump Cards: U.S. Covert Action and Counterintelligence, by Georgetown University Professor Roy Godson who is known for his close ties to the Israeli lobby in Washington:
Sometimes, if circumstances allow and the practition-ers are skillful, counterintelligence can target its deception not only at the internal and emigre opposition but also at the intelligence services and governments of foreign adver-saries.The Soviet Trust was such an operation.
The Trust was created in the early 1920s and com-pletely controlled by the Soviet secret service, the Cheka.
Believing they were operating in league with an active and effective anti-Bolshevik movement,opponents of the regime within the USSR and in exile were lured by the Trust into exposing themselves and became targets of Soviet state security.
Using that information and controlling communica-tions between Western intelligence agencies, the Russian emigre community, and Russian dissidents inside the coun-try, the Cheka expertly neutralized anti-Communist opposi-tion at home and abroad.
The Trust was also able to use its contacts with Western intelligence services to pass along misleading and false information on the internal state of the Soviet regime to those same services’ foreign ministries and governments.
Essentially, the West was being told by its intelligence “assets” within the Soviet Union that support for the Bolshevik regime was weakening, and that the Soviet lead-ers were at heart nationalists who, if left in peace by the West,would gradually turn a state dedicated to revolution at home and abroad into one that would behave in a more tra-ditional and predictable fashion . . .

The organization’s actual name was the Moscow Municipal Credit Association—thus, the Trust. It posed as a financial institution operating within the liberal economic environment of Lenin’s New Economic Policy. The bogus group’s clandestine name was the Monarchist Association of Central Russia. One ironic aspect of the Trust operation was that British and French intelligence services were paying the Russian emigres for the disinformation being supplied them by the Cheka through the Trust.Allegedly,at one point, money paid to these sources by the West was used to cover the expenses of the deception operation itself. In short, the West was paying to be deceived . . .
Given the fact that several generations of young KGB officers were shown that Trust operations were successful, it is not surprising that such operations were continued from the 1920s to the 1980s.
The "Trust" model for infiltration has been applied by the Mossad and its allies in the CIA and the FBI in this country to other dissident movements targeted for infiltration and take-over.Intelligence units such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are often part of the operation.
Careful study of recent ADL and SPLC bulletins will frequently (but not always) reveal precisely which "dissident" groups and leaders are being utilized (and promoted) to collect names and assemble dossiers on perceived or potential threats.The ADL and SPLC give a big “build-up” to their own controlled agents so as to give them “credibility. ” In other words, the average person will assume that because the ADL and SPLC happen to be attacking an individual or organization,that is some-how “proof” that the individual or organization is legitimate, as evi-denced by the ADL or SPLC attacks.Those who affiliate themselves with such "trust" operations do so at their own risk.
In the pages of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within we will learn much more about the actions of Soviet-style “Trust” intrigues on American soil.We will name those who lead phony opposition groups.

We will demonstrate that there has been a concerted effort to control— or destroy—genuine grass-roots American political opposition that threatens the power of Zionism and its (often-uneasy) allies in the global corporate elite.We will meet some of the more infamous media shills who use their influence to defame those who stand in the way of the internationalist agenda. We will survey the way in which traditional American political movements have been infiltrated and taken over,sub-verted in their otherwise pro-American agenda.

None of this is going to be a pleasant story as it unfolds, but it is a story that must be told if Americans are going to reclaim their nation and their heritage . . .

***

The Fox News Phenomenon:How Zionist Plutocrats Created a “Media Alternative” To the Garbage of the Established Liberal Media

In the opening pages of this volume, we met a handful of quite notorious Judas Goats whose names and faces are familiar to millions of Americans: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham,Anne Coulter and—last but far from least—Bill O’Reilly.

All are tried-and-true (and high-salaried) water-carriers for the Zionist cause—and apparently enthusiastic ones at that. Neo-conserva-tives of the first (and worst) order, this crew (for want of a better term to describe them) owe much of their fame and fortune to the constant promotion that they, and their views, or rather the views of their mas-ters and handlers receive through the medium of Fox News.

While Fox is the actual sponsor of the televised rantings of Hannity and O’Reilly, the other Judas Goats are also regularly hyped by Fox which, for all intents and purposes, has become the foremost popular mass media voice for the Zionist “neo-conservative” propaganda line.

For this reason, it’s quite worthwhile examining Fox News and the manner in which this network has become a Judas Goat in and of itself.

Beyond question, Fox has emerged—perhaps even more so than the three “liberal” networks—ABC, CBS, and NBC—as one of the most dan-gerous and divisive forces operating in our world today.

Fox, of course, is the broadcast network owned by the far-flung News Corporation, the media empire of Australian-born Rupert Murdoch. Let’s take a quick look at just what this formidable media empire constitutes:

• The Weekly Standard magazine, run for Murdoch by “neo-con-servative” William Kristol, son of the “ex-Trotskyite” neo-conservative godfather, Irving Kristol. (This magazine is one of the most loudly—not quietly—influential publications in America today, the virtual foreign policy bible of the “Dubya”Bush administration,and the one publication that can truly claim credit for laying the propaganda groundwork for the American debacle in Iraq.);
• 175 different newspapers including News of the World, The Sun, The Sunday Times, and The Times, published in Britain, and, perhaps most notably,The New York Post, the latter being one of the foremost voices for the Zionist cause in America;
• Twentieth Century Fox motion picture studios;
• Fox Television stations, in major metropolitan markets including:
Washington, D.C., Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, Minneapolis, Detroit, Atlanta, Baltimore, Orlando, Cleveland, Phoenix, Denver, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Salt Lake City, Birmingham, Memphis, Greensboro (North Carolina),Austin, and Ocala (Florida);
• Direct broadcast satellite television, spanning five continents— notably Foxtel;
• Fox News (cable) Channel and other cable outlets, reaching 300 million subscribers;
• Major publishing houses, such as HarperCollins Publishers (which now controls such renowned publishing companies as William Morrow & Company, Avon Books, Amistad Press and Fourth Estate) as well as ReganBooks, and Zondervan.
C learly, this is a major media empire. How it emerged to have such power and influence, even dictating American affairs, is an instructive story, and quite illustrative of the machinations of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within. In order to review the Fox phenomenon, we must go back to the mid-to-late 1960s.

During that time frame, many Americans began to perceive a determined and deliberate “liberal”slant in news coverage by the three major television networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) with CBS and its anchorman-of-long-standing,Walter Cronkite, often considered to be the most “lib-eral” of the three.
Americans detected much liberal propagandizing in the content of daily television programming, with blatant political messages bring broadcast in the content of television dramas, situation comedies and made-for-television movies.
What’s more, the content of the programming began to focus on what can best be described as “sleaze”—and that’s putting it lightly.

Traditional American values became the target of vulgar bathroom humor and the Christian faith was constantly upheld as somehow being a virtual form of evil, responsible for the tragedies of the past. America’s Founding Fathers were painted as evil and counter-culture figures were held up as role models for American youth.The list of very valid com-plaints about the three major networks, their “news”coverage and their programming could go on and on.

As Americans became more and more aware of the filth and the “liberal” propagandizing, many people—but not enough, sad to say— began to take a closer look at the “who”—rather than the “what”—of the three major networks.That is, Americans began to recognize that the three major networks were tightly-controlled mega-corporations held in the hands of a tiny clique of interlocking families and financial groups who were largely of Jewish origin.

What’s more, the Jewish influence in the editorial and management levels in the “news” divisions of the three major networks was also becoming increasingly more obvious. In short, people began to recog-nize that the “liberal” networks were effectively the media voices of a Jewish elite whose values—and interests—did not, in any way, shape or form, represent those of the vast majority of the American people.
As a consequence of this, there began to emerge a distinct dissat-isfaction not only with the three major networks, but a growing talk in the heartlands about “Jewish control of the media. ” To be sure, many folks were not so vocal about discussing the Jewish aspect of the problem with the networks, but this remained a constant (if only quietly spo-ken) phenomenon.

And on occasion, some big names in American life—ranging from former Vice President Spiro Agnew to General George Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and even Hollywood giants such as Robert Mitchum and Marlon Brando and famed author Truman Capote—actually dared to say publicly that there was an inordinate Jewish influence upon (or control of) the major media outlets in America.
In the end, this disillusionment with the broadcast industry and its machinations actually set the stage, in many respects, for the rise of Ronald Reagan and his election to the presidency in 1980. Americans were looking for a change and while Reagan promised a “new conser-vatism, ” in the end it proved to be something entirely different. But Americans were eager for an alternative to the “liberal” media—and along came Rupert Murdoch to the “rescue”—or so it seemed.

Americans who were fed up with the “liberal” media now had a self-appointed savior,a colorful foreign-born media tycoon who seemed to share their dissatisfaction and who seemed to be willing to provide a real “alternative. ” But that “alternative” is not what most Americans were really looking for, and many folks don’t seem understand that they’ve been conned—in fact, conned big-time.

Although already well-established in Australia as a growing media power on his own, Murdoch quietly received the international sponsor-ship and financial backing of some of the world’s most wealthy and powerful Jewish families: the Rothschilds of Europe, the Bronfmans of Canada and the Oppenheimers of South Africa. With their firm support, he began expanding his empire into Britain and around the planet.

In short order, Rupert Murdoch became the “hottest” item in the global media,and soon was on his way to achieving vast wealth beyond his wildest dreams and immense political power through the rise of his News Corporation empire and the lucrative advertising industry. It is thus no wonder that Murdoch himself came to be counted, along with the Rothschilds, Bronfmans and Oppenheimers, as part of a group quite correctly described as “The Billionaire Gang of Four. ” Today, now well established, Murdoch’s media voices, particularly Fox News, press the “hot button” issues—such as abortion, gay rights, prayer in schools—that stir up animosities between so-called “Christian Right”organizations and the groups and institutions to which they stand in opposition.
Meanwhile, ironically, other Murdoch media outlets, such as Fox Television, are responsible for promoting some of the worst garbage ever to appear on American television screens.Yet, for some reason, the Christian Right folks who revel in Fox News’“conservative” slant seem to miss the point that Rupert Murdoch’s media conglomerate is raking in advertising billions by selling sleaze.
All the while, of course, the Murdoch media is busy promoting the interests of the Zionist movement.And that,above all,is the most impor-tant point that needs to be recognized.
Although Murdoch and his media play the game of providing an “alternative, ” they are, in fact, providing a “controlled opposition, ” keep-ing the “conservative” and “traditional”American ranks in line, touting the Zionist cause as an “American” one, a cause that is fully in line with not just “making America great again” (in the imagery of Ronald Reaganesque rhetoric) but, in reality making America an empire—and one that is ruled by the Zionist elite.
In other words, Fox News is loudly—and proudly—promoting the theme that America is the world’s voice for sanity and democracy and that it is, quite simply,America’s job to rule the world.
And that is precisely—as we documented in our earlier work, The New Jerusalem—the Zionist agenda today: America’s capital and resources, its military men and women, its massive arsenal, are to be used for the establishment of a global imperium to advance the agenda of the well-heeled Zionist plutocrats and their international network of allied corporate interests and ideological soulmates.
While there are many good Americans who believe the Fox News (that is, Zionist) propaganda line that America must use its power ‘for good, ”—even at the sacrifice of the thousands of lives of Americans and others—there are many more Americans (and others worldwide) who don’t share that philosophy.
However, Fox News—and other elements in the Zionist propagan-da network—have begun to advance the theme that anyone who stands in the way of this global agenda is somehow “anti-American” and cer-tainly “anti-Semitic” (and also, even,“anti-Christian”).

Legislation such as the so-called Patriot Act and other mechanisms of control are being put into place in order to suppress dissent against the Zionist agenda. And Fox News is on the frontlines promoting these Orwellian schemes.
We need say nothing more in this regard, other than to warn sin-cere American patriots that Fox News is not their friend. Sincere Americans need to be wary of Fox News and its talking heads.

Americans must surrender to the winds the idea that “well, Fox says many good things, ” and to abandon the rationale that such voices from the Fox stable (or should we say “gutter”?) as Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and others are “often right. ” Fox and its adherents are dangers to America and they are dangers to the world.

Fox News certainly ranks as among the most dangerous of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within.

THE JUDAS GOATS— THE ENEMY WITHIN The shocking never-before-told story of the infiltration and subversion of the American nationalist movement

By MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER

Max I. Dimont - The Indestructible Jews

Max Dimont - The Indestructible Jews ... is a candid exposition of the concept of Jewish supremacy. ...Dimont says that Israel did not tie her fate to an outside power. Nothing could be further from the truth....Dimont’s audacity, his hypocrisy—call it “chutzpah,” if you will— reflects, in fact, the very attitude that has always dictated the Jewish attitude toward the rest of the world: those whom they refer to as “the Other,” “the Gentiles,” “the Goyim”—the non-humans, the cattle, the instruments of Satan.

Michael Collins Piper:

Talking of the birth of Israel as a nation-state in 1948, Dimont wrote:

"She was the only country born in the aftermath of World War II which, without enslaving other nations, without exploiting a segment of her own population, or without tying her fate to an outside power, succeeded in securing a standard of life, liberty, and law on a par with that of the most advanced Western nation.

How was all of this achieved in such a short time, in less than the lifespan of one generation? How could this small country, ravaged,denuded and despoiled for two thousand years by Romans, Byzantines, Sassanids, Arabs, Crusaders, Mamelukes,Turks, and Englishmen, have hoisted herself from serfdom to independence, from beggary to affluence, from cultural poverty to intellectual eminence in five short decades ...?

Where did the capital come from to pay for the industrial plants, for the high standard of living, for her cultural activities?"

Dimont goes on at some length in this grandiose manner of expression, never recognizing the fact that this country (Israel) which was born in the aftermath of World War II did, in fact, enslave other nations in assuming its statehood. We refer, of course, to the Christian Palestinians and the Muslim Palestinians.We refer, also, to the German people whose future as a nation-state seems (at least at this point) to be forever interconnected with the state of Israel due to the fact that the German people have been oppressed, they have been enslaved, through the massive billions of dollars in annual “reparations” that are extracted from the German people and paid to Israel.

Voltaire—the great French freethinker of the Enlightenment—although considered an “atheist,” very much shared Christ’s concerns and in his frequent writings on the Jewish Problem—also known as “the Jewish Question”—he reflected a point of view that, in its own fashion, acknowl-edges the very Jewish mindset set forth by Max Dimont so many centuries later.Voltaire wrote:

"The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbarous people who for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and an inextinguishable hatred toward all people by whom they are tolerated and through whom they are enriched.

The Jews are a horror to all people by whom they were admitted . . . at all times Jews have disfigured the truth by absurd fables. The Jews are the greatest scoundrels who ever besmirched this earth. The small Jewish nation dares to show an irreconcilable hatred toward other people’s possession."

And while Max Dimont bragged of the “indestructible” nature of the Jews and of how they survived the decay and collapse and destruction of other religions and civilizations, Charles Newdigate, a forthright member of the British House of Commons, said in 1858 that he had gleaned the nature of the Jewish role in history, based precisely on theTalmud of which Dimont later wrote so glowingly. Newdigate spoke of the Talmud’s “tendencies” which were of an “immoral,anti-social and anti-national character.” He said:

"The Jews have directly and indirectly brought about agitations and revolutions.They have caused ruin and misery to their fellow creatures by the most wicked and cunning devices.The cause of the odium against them lies in the character of Judaism itself which affords its votaries no point of centralization based on morality."

And while much has been written about the vile anti-Christian and anti-Christ ravings within the Talmud, it is often forgotten that the Talmud, as it emerged in Babylon,that has indeed been the foundation—as Max Dimont (among many others) has attested—for the long term Jewish world view, one which foresees ultimate Jewish triumph, the institution of what we know today as the New World Order.

from the book The New Babylon Those Who Reign Supreme, a Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious and Economic Origins of the New World Order by Michael Collins Piper

**

Even today, 12 centuries after the fact, Jews still gather in their synagogues on holidays to gloat over their destruction of the Goths, and Jewish writers openly boast of their treachery. The popular Jewish author and lecturer, Max I. Dimont, has taken particular satisfaction in the fate of the Gothic women, both in Spain and in those areas of Gaul subject to Moorish raiding parties from the south. In his best-selling book, The Indestructible Jews, Dimont writes: "As blond Christian maidens fetched fancy prices in the slave markets, raids in Christian lands by Muslim private entrepreneurs became big business. Female captives were pedigreed like dogs. Their Christian antecedents, their genuine blondness, their virginity, and their ability to bear children were all ascertained and notarized before they were marketed."

Dimont discreetly avoids mentioning that the slave merchants doing the pedigreeing and marketing of these White girls were, in most cases, Jews. What he does say is: "From the inception of Islam's conquest, Spanish Jews had soared to the highest government posts. A series of brilliant Jewish viziers -- viceroys -- enriched the caliphate's coffers and helped usher in an age of splendor and learning."

Bryen (an American and a U.S. government employee) was heard continually referring to the U.S.government as “they”

Michael Saba and the veteran journalist, Andrew St. George worked closely together for years seeking to publicize the Israeli espionage scandal involving Richard Perle’s longtime associate Stephen J. Bryen. Saba wrote a book about the Bryen affair, The Road to Armageddon, while his friend St. George wrote extensively about the scandal in the pages of The Spotlight, one of the few publications to dare to delve into the matter.

Although Perle and Bryen achieved immense power as high-level political appointees in the Reagan administration, their rise was nearly derailed by a scandal that erupted just two years prior to Reagan’s election to the presidency. A complete understanding of this scandal is critical to understanding precisely how closely wed to the government of Israel that the Perle network truly is.

Let us begin by noting that in the era of the Team B intrigue (the mid-1970s)— Perle left Senator Jackson’s staff and began engaging in the private arms business, setting up many lucrative deals between the Pentagon and Soltam, one of Israel’s premier weapons firms.

Meanwhile, Perle’s Capitol Hill associate, Stephen J. Bryen, was under observation by the FBI beginning as early as 1977 when he was suspected of using his post as a Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffer to obtain classified Pentagon information, particularly related to Arab military matters, that the Defense Intelligence Agency suspected Bryen was turning over to the Israelis.

Then, on March 9, 1978, Bryen was overheard in a private conversation over breakfast with four Israeli intelligence officials at the coffee shop of the Madison Hotel in Washington. It was clear, based on the content of his conversation, that he was providing the Israeli officials with high-level military information.

What was so amazing, however, was that Bryen (an American and a U.S. government employee) was heard continually referring to the U.S.government as “they” and to use the pronoun “we” when referring to his—and the Israeli government’s—position. Little did Bryen know that an American of Arabic descent, who had been active in Arab-American affairs and lobbying on the Middle East issue, would recognize him (Bryen) and actually understand the sensitive nature of the conversation that Bryen was conducting with the Israeli officials.

The Arab-American businessman, one Michael Saba, reported the matter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In due course, a full-scale FBI inquiry into Bryen evolved to the point that the Justice Department (which oversees the FBI) assembled a 632-page file on Bryen’s activities. The U.S. Attorney handling the investigation, Joel Lisker (an American of the Jewish faith) recommended that Bryen be indicted on felony charges of having not only been an unregistered foreign agent for Israel but also of having committed espionage on behalf of Israel.

The scandal finally broke (to a limited degree) in the American media, with the liberal journal, The Nation, making the allegation that Bryen had routinely taken orders from Zvi Rafiah, a counselor at the Israeli Embassy. In fact, it was ultimately learned, Rafiah was not just an embassy counselor. He was the U.S. station chief for the clandestine services division of Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad.

Despite all this, Bryen was not indicted. Instead, Bryen was told to “quietly” depart from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff, which he did. Appropriately, Bryen promptly set up shop in Washington, D.C. as a publicist and lobbyist for Israel as the director of a group known as the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).Ultimately, as we have seen, when Republican Ronald Reagan was elected president with firm support from the neo-conservative Jewish network, Perle and Bryen moved back into the upper ranks of the U.S. government policy making establishment—despite the scandal.

from the book The High Priests of War
By Michael Collins Piper

Major Osman Bey - The Conquest of the World by the Jews

 Michael Collins Piper:

In 1878, Major Osman Bey wrote “an historical and ethnical essay” entitled The Conquest of the World by the Jews.The work examined how what he called “the Principle of Material Interests” enslaved the people of the world by financial oppression. He described this “Principle of Material Interests” as a “secret power” that the Jewish people, as a united force, discovered. He focused on the concept of Jewish solidarity, suggesting that if one attacked a Jew in one place, all of the Jews of the five continents arose as one man against the attacker. This concept of Jewish solidarity was at the foundation of his writings in this realm.

He said that the petty medieval usurers had changed into modern bankers or stock-brokers. “Those Wandering Jews of long ago,” he said,“ have become crafty speculators and the old clothes men and peddlers have opened elegant warehouses and industrial halls. ”However, he added a critical point that must be understood:

There was a time still lacking the crown of the edifice; that is, the embodiment of the mode of principle and a concrete and tangible power, which is inborn in every human enterprise; for, as the ecclesiastical or raw military rule ultimately incorporated into a pope or an emperor, thus the Jewish money supremacy must necessarily induce the formation of a dynasty, which derived its origin and its permanent justification from the Principle of Material Interests.

Osman was referring, of course, to the Rothschild Empire.

It was Rothschild, he said,who rose “more by the force of circumstances than by the consequences of his own exertions, to the high and powerful position of a visible head of the Jewish supremacy.” Osman noted:

All the Jews bowed down before this new ruler and do so bow down ever since his rule has been recognized from one end of the world to the other.

As the king of finances, Rothschild commands the rolling masses of the Jewish capital as completely as the German or Russian emperor commands the moveable masses of his armies.
The power of this “self-constituted ruler of all the Jews,” Osman said, was “not to be calculated by the thousands of millions which he can call his own, but by that far greater, and really fabulous, mass of gold, the circulation whereof is dependent upon the orders issued by his cabinet.”

Osman was clear to note that the “rolling masses of the Jewish capital” were international in scope:

Each Jewish millionaire who carries on financial operations in Paris, Vienna, Berlin or in the United States [and note his 1878 reference to the United States—Ed.] is insofar a lieutenant general of Rothschild as it were, always governing his actions by the indica-tions of that financial barometer.

He noted that the wealth of three branches of the Rothschild family were estimated at about 3,000 millions of dollars and he pointed out that “this is pretty nearly the amount which the French government was at some trouble to raise for [a] war indemnity.” So, he concluded,“ one family is as wealthy as a whole nation. "He added: “When one reflects that this immense wealth is the fruit of the labor of millions of unfortunates, one might doubt one’s sanity.” Osman summarized it all:

So long as the world existed, such an unnatural state of things has never before been known.The head of the Rothschild family is therefore a potentate, a ruler within the full meaning of the word, and his subjects are the millions of human beings who incessantly labor to support his power and his splendor. The Rothschilds possess a dozen of castles, truly royal residences, situated in the most magnificent and cultured countries.

There these rulers unfold a gorgeous splendor and receive the adulations of the magnates of this earth, not excluding emperors and kings, and yet the head of the Rothschild family places little value in being called a king. His Jewish majesty is evidently content with being a king and enjoying the power which immense riches procure for him. But in all other respects Rothschild plays literally the role of a ruler and does not neglect the duties which his royal dignity imposes upon him.

It is he who represents the Jewish people with splendor as other rulers represent the power of their respective nations.The Jewish ruler, for instance, never shrinks from taking part in all sub-scriptions which fashion or report has invested with a certain importance [that is, the Jews insert their money and influence in highly public—one might say “flashy”—ways in order to make their presence and names well known and “respected”—Ed.].

Rothschild always takes care when visiting a particular locality to leave a memento of his presence, either by founding some philanthropic institution or by a princely donation.
Besides this, the Rothschilds, as the visible head of the Jewish nationality, have in recent times made it their duty to lay the cornerstone whenever some benevolent institution, devoted exclusively to the Jews, is to be erected.The power of this Jewish autocrat is so immeasurable and unlimited that it far outshines the power of all other kings and emperors.

When, but a few years ago, two great empires—France and Prussia—carried on a bloody war, each country putting forth many hundreds of thousands of soldiers, it was nevertheless necessary to call in a third potentate to establish quiet in Europe.This third potentate was called Rothschild—that “King by the Grace of God”—whose signature was indispensible for the definite conclusion of [the war].

Although some modern-day writers, largely Rothschild publicists, have tried to diminish the role of the Rothschild influence on American soil, Osman wrote that in the United States, "their power in the United States is well known and felt.”

It was stated on good authority, he pointed out, that the demonetizing of the American silver dollar in 1873 was achieved by an agent of the Rothschilds named Earnest Seagel who went to Washington for that purpose and who was believed “by corrupt means” to have effected that change as so desired by the Rothschild Empire. “So cleverly was the matter done,” he noted, "that it was some time before the change was generally known.”

Osman noted, too, that the Rothschild forces “longed also for a monopoly of the liberal arts and sciences which are open only to the higher ranks of society.Knowing well that they could acquire honor, regard and political power only by those means, they engaged in literature, medicine and public education and flooded the professions of law and journalism.

“Jewish newspaper writers form in every state, "he added,“ a closely connected and all powerful combination composed of minds as clever and industrious as they are unscrupulous and that having in a certain way appropriated a right of intervention in all [form of] affairs in order to levy tribute on the credulity of the public.

“This combination, "he said,“ having such means at its disposal, far more powerful than church or feudal state is in possession of a vast and terrible power in the hands of which we are nothing but abject slaves."

Of the Jewish power plays in the political arena, he wrote:

There are two fundamental principles: that the Jews as an organized group have endeavored to concentrate their influence, scattered as it is all over the world at any given moment, at the point to be conquered in the most effective manner in order to suppress all local opposition tendencies.They endeavor at all times to derive advantage from the disunion of others.

In order to achieve that, they place their money power at the disposal [of both parties which may be in dispute with one another] while they take care, at the same time, to have representatives in every part.

Thanks to this policy, the Jews are always on hand to turn every party victory to their advantage.

Such a distribution of power is like a good hand of cards, wherein all four colors are represented so that some points are always sure, no matter which color is turned up.
As an example, he noted:

For instance, we see in France: Imperialistic, Republican, even Socialistic Jews. If Imperialism gains a day, [Jewish finance] would be there to represent the Jewish interest. If, on the other hand, the Republic or even the Commune chances to be victorious [Jewish Socialists are] at hand to change into the trump color, as it were, of the Jewish hand of cards.

“In short,” he said, “the Jews preserve their prestige independently of all changes of government and approach their ultimate object—the conquest of the world—an approach, more and more as time goes by their ultimate object—no matter how circumstances may change.They have discovered the secret of winning with all parties and losing with none.”

The Rothschilds and their satellites likewise played this game on the international stage. “All nations, ”he wrote ,“are manipulated as necessary as part of this grand international game.”

Osman wrote of how the Jewish money power was able to manipulate the press.He said there were three classes of journals: journals in the pay of the Jews; journals bearing the banner of a specific nationality or ideology, but, in fact, being fronts for Jewish interests; and thirdly, journals openly bearing the Jewish banner.

The first class, those in the pay of the Jews, were those that had been essentially bought off.The second class of journals were those he described as the proverbial “wolves in sheep’s clothing”—pretending to represent the interests of other groups but, in fact, were “serving an excellent purpose under their mask by effecting changes in public opinion since their readers rarely perceived that the articles appearing in them . . . [lead the public to believe] that these papers reflect the drift of public opinion in [the country in which they are published] and yet they mirror only the reflection of the Jewish devil who tries to lead us astray at his pleasure and bewitches us with the doctrines and sophisms of the modern school.”

(In the United States today, of course, we find the journals of what we might call “Kosher Liberals” and “Kosher Conservatives” who—while angrily disagreeing on all other issues—still nonetheless fall into place in endorsing Jewish interests and the concerns of the state of Israel.) Then, of course, Osman noted there were those journals that were open-y proclaiming themselves as reflecting the interests of the Jewish community and geared toward the Jews themselves, designed, wrote Osman, “to lead Israel [the Jewish people] in its aggressive movement upon the wealth of the heathens”—that is, the non-Jews of the planet.

“This press utters the war cry, "he said,“ and directs and leads the Jews onward. Without these journals, the Jewish movement would not form a whole and its activity would necessarily lack inner force.”

Osman described all of this as evidence of “the existence of a secret but fearful power.” This combination,he said, "forms an appalling battery, to fight against which appears next to impossible.”

Referring to independent journals outside the Rothschild (and Jewish) sphere of influence, Osman said, "TThe Jews have ready at all times a bullet shower of scoff and calumny vomited forth from the lying mouths of hundreds of journalists: every person who does not allow himself to be plundered by the Jews is a‘reactionary’ and if he takes a cowhide in his hand [for self defense against Jewish attacks] he is a‘barbarian.’” Osman concluded—so long ago in 1878—that the conquest of the world by the Jews was henceforth what he called "a fixed fact that could not be disputed.”

What assisted in the conquest of the world was usury, what he described as a “pernicious habit of issuing bonds, not just the issuance of bonds by nations, but municipalities which thereby mortgaged the wealth of nations and communities all over the world. "The interest on those bonds “went on continuously by day as well as by night” he noted. “Its course sweeps like a tornado over fair fields,destroying everything in its path.”

What Osman called “the secret power of accumulative interest” enslaved mankind, he said, and became the “primary weapon” by the Jewish interests for setting in place what we today call a NewWorld Order.The only answer was for nations and individuals to keep out of debt and he said that this would break the back of the International Money Power as soon as all debts were liquidated on a basis that was both just and equitable.

The irony of it all, Osman said, was that while people considered themselves “free” and boasted of high culture within their natures, no one yet dared to rise against those who had effected their conquest of the world only by means of cheating and usury:

"The only way to restore social equilibrium is to take hold of the tree by the root and direct the attacks against the cause of this cosmopolitan and fundamental evil.That way and only then could true statesmen succeed in freeing mankind from the greatest plague from which it ever suffered."

And the source of that plague was indeed the global construct of International Jewish Finance dominated by the Rothschild Dynasty.

from the book The New Babylon Those Who Reign Supreme, a Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious and Economic Origins of the New World Order