A Judas Goat

 “A Judas Goat is a term used to describe a trained goat used at a slaughterhouse and in general animal herding.The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them to a specific destination.

“In stockyards,a Judas goat will lead sheep to slaughter, while its own life is spared.Judas goats are also used to lead other animals to specific pens and onto trucks.The term Judas Goat is derived from a biblical reference to Judas Iscariot [who betrayed Jesus Christ to the Pharisees].

“The phrase has also been used to describe a goat that is used to find feral goats that are targeted for eradication.The Judas Goat is outfitted with a transmitter, painted red and then released.The goat then finds the remaining herds of wild goats,allowing hunters to exterminate them.

—From Wikipedia, the Internet encyclopedia.

“...Lambs were being led by a Judas goat into the chute.Two workers stood at the end, jolting the animals with enough electricity to render them brain dead. In an instant, prongs at the sheep's brains and in the fleece near their hearts delivered a zap that collapsed them, after which they were handed through . . . to the kill floor. The Judas goats . . . then returned to the pens, where they collected another batch of sheep. ” —From: “A Slaughter House Tour” at karlschatz.com

***
“Controlled Opposition” The Soviet “Trust” Model for Infiltration and Manipulation —Even the Actual Creation—of Opposing Forces:
Utilized Today in America by The Enemy Within The early 20th century so-called "Trust" model utilized by the Soviet Union to infiltrate and destroy its enemies is the foundation for the very techniques often used both by American intelligence agen-cies—along with Israel’s clandestine service, Mossad and its conduits such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith—to infiltrate and destroy (or otherwise control the activities of) domestic dissident move-ments deemed hostile to the interests of Zionism and Globalism.
Those who fail to understand this age-old tactic will never be able to fathom the extent to which the American political system has been manipulated by these alien forces.
Although—even today—there are persons and organizations active within the so-called “nationalist” and “revisionist” and “patriotic” move-ments in America, who seem to “say the right things, ” the truth is that many of those in question are actually witting—sometimes unwitting— agents of discord,being used for the purposes of intelligence gathering, propaganda and disinformation, all designed to establish further influ-ence upon the American system for the purpose of consolidating the power of The Enemy Within.
Let us examine the Soviet “Trust” and how it operated.This little-known counterintelligence operation known as "the Trust" was estab-lished by the Cheka, the predecessor to the Soviet KGB, as a means through which to set up and control a "phony opposition" in order to flush out genuine opponents of the Bolshevik regime which, as histori-ans know, was under the control of non-Russians—mostly Jews.
When reading the following materials relating to the workings of the "Trust," simply substitute the word "Israeli" for the word "Soviet" and the word "Mossad" for the names "Cheka" and "KGB" and you will under-stand how the "Trust" technique has been applied by the Mossad, in manipulating groups that “seem” to be opposing Israeli interests.
(Likewise, a similar formula can be used substituting the terms “CIA” or “FBI” as it may be appropriate.) A brief description of the operation of "The Trust" appears in Chekisty:A History of the KGB by John J. Dziak:
Where no genuine internal opposition organization exists [a security service might] invent one—both to infil-trate the more dangerous . . . organizations abroad in order to blunt or channel their actions, and to surface real or potential internal dissidents. If an internal opposition already exists, it will be infiltrated in an attempt to control it, to provoke opponents into exposing themselves, and to cause the movement to serve state interests.
A more comprehensive account of "The Trust" appears in Dirty Tricks or Trump Cards: U.S. Covert Action and Counterintelligence, by Georgetown University Professor Roy Godson who is known for his close ties to the Israeli lobby in Washington:
Sometimes, if circumstances allow and the practition-ers are skillful, counterintelligence can target its deception not only at the internal and emigre opposition but also at the intelligence services and governments of foreign adver-saries.The Soviet Trust was such an operation.
The Trust was created in the early 1920s and com-pletely controlled by the Soviet secret service, the Cheka.
Believing they were operating in league with an active and effective anti-Bolshevik movement,opponents of the regime within the USSR and in exile were lured by the Trust into exposing themselves and became targets of Soviet state security.
Using that information and controlling communica-tions between Western intelligence agencies, the Russian emigre community, and Russian dissidents inside the coun-try, the Cheka expertly neutralized anti-Communist opposi-tion at home and abroad.
The Trust was also able to use its contacts with Western intelligence services to pass along misleading and false information on the internal state of the Soviet regime to those same services’ foreign ministries and governments.
Essentially, the West was being told by its intelligence “assets” within the Soviet Union that support for the Bolshevik regime was weakening, and that the Soviet lead-ers were at heart nationalists who, if left in peace by the West,would gradually turn a state dedicated to revolution at home and abroad into one that would behave in a more tra-ditional and predictable fashion . . .

The organization’s actual name was the Moscow Municipal Credit Association—thus, the Trust. It posed as a financial institution operating within the liberal economic environment of Lenin’s New Economic Policy. The bogus group’s clandestine name was the Monarchist Association of Central Russia. One ironic aspect of the Trust operation was that British and French intelligence services were paying the Russian emigres for the disinformation being supplied them by the Cheka through the Trust.Allegedly,at one point, money paid to these sources by the West was used to cover the expenses of the deception operation itself. In short, the West was paying to be deceived . . .
Given the fact that several generations of young KGB officers were shown that Trust operations were successful, it is not surprising that such operations were continued from the 1920s to the 1980s.
The "Trust" model for infiltration has been applied by the Mossad and its allies in the CIA and the FBI in this country to other dissident movements targeted for infiltration and take-over.Intelligence units such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are often part of the operation.
Careful study of recent ADL and SPLC bulletins will frequently (but not always) reveal precisely which "dissident" groups and leaders are being utilized (and promoted) to collect names and assemble dossiers on perceived or potential threats.The ADL and SPLC give a big “build-up” to their own controlled agents so as to give them “credibility. ” In other words, the average person will assume that because the ADL and SPLC happen to be attacking an individual or organization,that is some-how “proof” that the individual or organization is legitimate, as evi-denced by the ADL or SPLC attacks.Those who affiliate themselves with such "trust" operations do so at their own risk.
In the pages of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within we will learn much more about the actions of Soviet-style “Trust” intrigues on American soil.We will name those who lead phony opposition groups.

We will demonstrate that there has been a concerted effort to control— or destroy—genuine grass-roots American political opposition that threatens the power of Zionism and its (often-uneasy) allies in the global corporate elite.We will meet some of the more infamous media shills who use their influence to defame those who stand in the way of the internationalist agenda. We will survey the way in which traditional American political movements have been infiltrated and taken over,sub-verted in their otherwise pro-American agenda.

None of this is going to be a pleasant story as it unfolds, but it is a story that must be told if Americans are going to reclaim their nation and their heritage . . .

***

The Fox News Phenomenon:How Zionist Plutocrats Created a “Media Alternative” To the Garbage of the Established Liberal Media

In the opening pages of this volume, we met a handful of quite notorious Judas Goats whose names and faces are familiar to millions of Americans: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham,Anne Coulter and—last but far from least—Bill O’Reilly.

All are tried-and-true (and high-salaried) water-carriers for the Zionist cause—and apparently enthusiastic ones at that. Neo-conserva-tives of the first (and worst) order, this crew (for want of a better term to describe them) owe much of their fame and fortune to the constant promotion that they, and their views, or rather the views of their mas-ters and handlers receive through the medium of Fox News.

While Fox is the actual sponsor of the televised rantings of Hannity and O’Reilly, the other Judas Goats are also regularly hyped by Fox which, for all intents and purposes, has become the foremost popular mass media voice for the Zionist “neo-conservative” propaganda line.

For this reason, it’s quite worthwhile examining Fox News and the manner in which this network has become a Judas Goat in and of itself.

Beyond question, Fox has emerged—perhaps even more so than the three “liberal” networks—ABC, CBS, and NBC—as one of the most dan-gerous and divisive forces operating in our world today.

Fox, of course, is the broadcast network owned by the far-flung News Corporation, the media empire of Australian-born Rupert Murdoch. Let’s take a quick look at just what this formidable media empire constitutes:

• The Weekly Standard magazine, run for Murdoch by “neo-con-servative” William Kristol, son of the “ex-Trotskyite” neo-conservative godfather, Irving Kristol. (This magazine is one of the most loudly—not quietly—influential publications in America today, the virtual foreign policy bible of the “Dubya”Bush administration,and the one publication that can truly claim credit for laying the propaganda groundwork for the American debacle in Iraq.);
• 175 different newspapers including News of the World, The Sun, The Sunday Times, and The Times, published in Britain, and, perhaps most notably,The New York Post, the latter being one of the foremost voices for the Zionist cause in America;
• Twentieth Century Fox motion picture studios;
• Fox Television stations, in major metropolitan markets including:
Washington, D.C., Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, Minneapolis, Detroit, Atlanta, Baltimore, Orlando, Cleveland, Phoenix, Denver, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Salt Lake City, Birmingham, Memphis, Greensboro (North Carolina),Austin, and Ocala (Florida);
• Direct broadcast satellite television, spanning five continents— notably Foxtel;
• Fox News (cable) Channel and other cable outlets, reaching 300 million subscribers;
• Major publishing houses, such as HarperCollins Publishers (which now controls such renowned publishing companies as William Morrow & Company, Avon Books, Amistad Press and Fourth Estate) as well as ReganBooks, and Zondervan.
C learly, this is a major media empire. How it emerged to have such power and influence, even dictating American affairs, is an instructive story, and quite illustrative of the machinations of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within. In order to review the Fox phenomenon, we must go back to the mid-to-late 1960s.

During that time frame, many Americans began to perceive a determined and deliberate “liberal”slant in news coverage by the three major television networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) with CBS and its anchorman-of-long-standing,Walter Cronkite, often considered to be the most “lib-eral” of the three.
Americans detected much liberal propagandizing in the content of daily television programming, with blatant political messages bring broadcast in the content of television dramas, situation comedies and made-for-television movies.
What’s more, the content of the programming began to focus on what can best be described as “sleaze”—and that’s putting it lightly.

Traditional American values became the target of vulgar bathroom humor and the Christian faith was constantly upheld as somehow being a virtual form of evil, responsible for the tragedies of the past. America’s Founding Fathers were painted as evil and counter-culture figures were held up as role models for American youth.The list of very valid com-plaints about the three major networks, their “news”coverage and their programming could go on and on.

As Americans became more and more aware of the filth and the “liberal” propagandizing, many people—but not enough, sad to say— began to take a closer look at the “who”—rather than the “what”—of the three major networks.That is, Americans began to recognize that the three major networks were tightly-controlled mega-corporations held in the hands of a tiny clique of interlocking families and financial groups who were largely of Jewish origin.

What’s more, the Jewish influence in the editorial and management levels in the “news” divisions of the three major networks was also becoming increasingly more obvious. In short, people began to recog-nize that the “liberal” networks were effectively the media voices of a Jewish elite whose values—and interests—did not, in any way, shape or form, represent those of the vast majority of the American people.
As a consequence of this, there began to emerge a distinct dissat-isfaction not only with the three major networks, but a growing talk in the heartlands about “Jewish control of the media. ” To be sure, many folks were not so vocal about discussing the Jewish aspect of the problem with the networks, but this remained a constant (if only quietly spo-ken) phenomenon.

And on occasion, some big names in American life—ranging from former Vice President Spiro Agnew to General George Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and even Hollywood giants such as Robert Mitchum and Marlon Brando and famed author Truman Capote—actually dared to say publicly that there was an inordinate Jewish influence upon (or control of) the major media outlets in America.
In the end, this disillusionment with the broadcast industry and its machinations actually set the stage, in many respects, for the rise of Ronald Reagan and his election to the presidency in 1980. Americans were looking for a change and while Reagan promised a “new conser-vatism, ” in the end it proved to be something entirely different. But Americans were eager for an alternative to the “liberal” media—and along came Rupert Murdoch to the “rescue”—or so it seemed.

Americans who were fed up with the “liberal” media now had a self-appointed savior,a colorful foreign-born media tycoon who seemed to share their dissatisfaction and who seemed to be willing to provide a real “alternative. ” But that “alternative” is not what most Americans were really looking for, and many folks don’t seem understand that they’ve been conned—in fact, conned big-time.

Although already well-established in Australia as a growing media power on his own, Murdoch quietly received the international sponsor-ship and financial backing of some of the world’s most wealthy and powerful Jewish families: the Rothschilds of Europe, the Bronfmans of Canada and the Oppenheimers of South Africa. With their firm support, he began expanding his empire into Britain and around the planet.

In short order, Rupert Murdoch became the “hottest” item in the global media,and soon was on his way to achieving vast wealth beyond his wildest dreams and immense political power through the rise of his News Corporation empire and the lucrative advertising industry. It is thus no wonder that Murdoch himself came to be counted, along with the Rothschilds, Bronfmans and Oppenheimers, as part of a group quite correctly described as “The Billionaire Gang of Four. ” Today, now well established, Murdoch’s media voices, particularly Fox News, press the “hot button” issues—such as abortion, gay rights, prayer in schools—that stir up animosities between so-called “Christian Right”organizations and the groups and institutions to which they stand in opposition.
Meanwhile, ironically, other Murdoch media outlets, such as Fox Television, are responsible for promoting some of the worst garbage ever to appear on American television screens.Yet, for some reason, the Christian Right folks who revel in Fox News’“conservative” slant seem to miss the point that Rupert Murdoch’s media conglomerate is raking in advertising billions by selling sleaze.
All the while, of course, the Murdoch media is busy promoting the interests of the Zionist movement.And that,above all,is the most impor-tant point that needs to be recognized.
Although Murdoch and his media play the game of providing an “alternative, ” they are, in fact, providing a “controlled opposition, ” keep-ing the “conservative” and “traditional”American ranks in line, touting the Zionist cause as an “American” one, a cause that is fully in line with not just “making America great again” (in the imagery of Ronald Reaganesque rhetoric) but, in reality making America an empire—and one that is ruled by the Zionist elite.
In other words, Fox News is loudly—and proudly—promoting the theme that America is the world’s voice for sanity and democracy and that it is, quite simply,America’s job to rule the world.
And that is precisely—as we documented in our earlier work, The New Jerusalem—the Zionist agenda today: America’s capital and resources, its military men and women, its massive arsenal, are to be used for the establishment of a global imperium to advance the agenda of the well-heeled Zionist plutocrats and their international network of allied corporate interests and ideological soulmates.
While there are many good Americans who believe the Fox News (that is, Zionist) propaganda line that America must use its power ‘for good, ”—even at the sacrifice of the thousands of lives of Americans and others—there are many more Americans (and others worldwide) who don’t share that philosophy.
However, Fox News—and other elements in the Zionist propagan-da network—have begun to advance the theme that anyone who stands in the way of this global agenda is somehow “anti-American” and cer-tainly “anti-Semitic” (and also, even,“anti-Christian”).

Legislation such as the so-called Patriot Act and other mechanisms of control are being put into place in order to suppress dissent against the Zionist agenda. And Fox News is on the frontlines promoting these Orwellian schemes.
We need say nothing more in this regard, other than to warn sin-cere American patriots that Fox News is not their friend. Sincere Americans need to be wary of Fox News and its talking heads.

Americans must surrender to the winds the idea that “well, Fox says many good things, ” and to abandon the rationale that such voices from the Fox stable (or should we say “gutter”?) as Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and others are “often right. ” Fox and its adherents are dangers to America and they are dangers to the world.

Fox News certainly ranks as among the most dangerous of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within.

THE JUDAS GOATS— THE ENEMY WITHIN The shocking never-before-told story of the infiltration and subversion of the American nationalist movement

By MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER