Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe(WHO and BZgA2010 )A third document pursues the same goals, but through more moderate wording: Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe, published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the German Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) in 2010 .16
As in all sex education, the WHO functions on the anthropological premise that humans have a need for sexual activity from birth on, and that they have a “right” to it. Adults allegedly should stimulate this need right from the beginning, speak to the child in detail at every age level about sexual acts, and give them the opportunity to live out their sexual needs free of “gender stereotypes.” A chart presents “age-appropriate” sex education:
• Age 0 –4 : The child has “the right to explore nakedness and the body and gender identities.” The child should learn “to differentiate between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ secrets and learn: ‘My body belongs to me.’”
• Age 4 –6 : The child learns to name each body part, and caregivers are to “wash every part of the body” and “talk about sexual matters in sexual language.” The child should be “given information” about “enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body in early childhood masturbation,” “friendship and love towards people of same sex,” “secret love and first love,” and “an awareness of rights.”
• Age 6 –9 : The child should be informed about “menstruation and ejaculation, choices about pregnancy, different methods of contraception, sex in the media, including the Internet, enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body (masturbation/self-stimulation), difference between friendship, love and lust, friendship and love towards people of same sex, diseases related to sexuality.” They should “examine their body, use sexual language and accept diversity.”
• Age 9 –12 : First sexual experience, variability of sexual behavior, contraceptives and their use, pleasure, masturbation, orgasm, differences between gender identity and biological sex, learn about STDs and HIV and sexual rights. The child is to acquire media competence using the Internet and mobile phones and deal with pornography. The child is to talk about sex and make conscious decisions to have sexual experiences or not.
• Age 12 –15 : The child learns the skill to obtain and use condoms; and obtains communication skills to have safe and enjoyable sex, and to deal with shame, fear, jealousy and disappointments. Child learns more modern media competence and deals with pornography.
• Age 15 and up: Time to learn about genital mutilation, circumcision, anorexia, bulimia, hymen and hymen repair, pregnancy in same-sex relationships, contraception services, designer babies, transactional sex [a euphemism for prostitution]—and acquire a critical view of different cultural/religious norms related to pregnancy and parenthood.
All right then, parents, teach your babies about masturbation, talk about sex to your children, push them into sexual activity, and let the school teach them about contraception, abortion and same-sex lust, love and parenthood before puberty. Teach them how to use condoms, immerse them in pornography, get them addicted to sex, let them know that all this is their “right”—drown their childhood in the abyss of sexual obsession, together with the dignity of man and the hope of your children for a happy family.
What school principal, teacher, father or mother can stand up to this international authoritarian pressure? When an organization responsible for the health of the world (the World Health Organization), together with a German government institution, draws up “Standards for Sexuality Education” and creates the impression that they are derived through scientific objectivity, then obviously this serves the welfare of the world population—or does it?
The document’s appendix contains comprehensive lists of literature, curricula, organizations, centers, foundations and youth organizations that drive “sex education” of children and teenagers in the United States. HOW IS IT POSSIBLE that a whole generation has fallen into the hands of a cultural revolutionary mafia that appears bent on turning future generations into amorphous, rootless masses of sex-addicted consumers?
Gabriele Kuby
The Global Sexual Revolution: The Destruction of Freedom in the Name of Freedom
To be is to be contingent: nothing of which it can be said that "it is" can be alone and independent. But being is a member of paticca-samuppada as arising which contains ignorance. Being is only invertible by ignorance.
Destruction of ignorance destroys the illusion of being. When ignorance is no more, than consciousness no longer can attribute being (pahoti) at all. But that is not all for when consciousness is predicated of one who has no ignorance than it is no more indicatable (as it was indicated in M Sutta 22)
Nanamoli Thera
Sunday, February 16, 2020
A whole generation has fallen into the hands of a cultural revolutionary mafia
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment