Brugioni and Poirier, Holocaust Revisited

 

January 1979: the Month When the Holocaust Died

In January 1979, out of the blue and for reasons unknown, two CIA staffers published several aerial photographs of Auschwitz, taken on four different dates in 1944. For reasons unknown, the Allied aerial photography as a whole had remained hidden from view for forty-five years. These pictures were taken over a period from spring 1944 through January 1945, including the months from May through July when, according to the conformist historians, the Hungarian Jews were allegedly being slaughtered to the tune of 10,000 to 20,000 per day. The mendacity and cynicism of those who had been making this baseless claim since 1945 was shattered by this revelation.439 When this little book by two former CIA analysts, Dino A. Brugioni and Robert G. Poirier, appeared, several of these pictures became available to the public for the first time. In their general discussion, the authors talk about “external burning pits” (Holocaust Revisited, 10) at Birkenau, but are unable to identify even one such “pit” in their photography. With regard to the alleged smoke and flame that Wiesel has claimed to have seen, they are a bit more honest with their reader:

"Although survivors recalled that smoke and flame emanated continually from the crematoria and was visible for miles, the photography we examined gave no proof of this."

These pictures proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the vast open pits in which Wiesel had supposedly seen truckloads of children and adults being burned alive were completely imaginary. Nor did these pictures show the long lines of 10,000 to 20,000 Jews waiting patiently each day to be taken to the “gas chambers,” or the masses of dead bodies that would have had to be lying about waiting for disposal as successive groups waited to be “gassed.”

Mendacity of the New York Times and Washington Post about the Aerial Photos

It was one thing for the CIA to allow the publication of these pictures that destroyed, once and for all, the myth of Auschwitz as an “extermination camp” where “four million” people had died. But since we live in a Judeocentric “mediacracy,” in which the owners of the Zionist media, the Holocaust fundamentalists, actually control the everyday political reality of the world in which Americans live, it would be another thing to see what meaning the Zionist media would assign to this revelation. The answer did not take long in coming, for both the Washington Post and the New York Times, both owned by wealthy Jewish families who set the “mainstream” media parameters of what right-thinking and respectable people will be allowed to say about “the Holocaust,” published their official interpretations within days of each other. In each case, no mention was made of the glaring fact that the pictures revealed that the “eyewitnesses” who had spoken of 10,000 to 20,000 people a day being killed there and, like Wiesel, of massive open pits in which truckloads of Jewish babies were burned alive, were revealed to have been outrageous liars.

Also, in each case, the silent testimony of the pictures against the Holocaust was avoided by orienting the reports around the subject of the “failure to bomb” theme that the Zionists had introduced during 1978. In addition, both newspapers employed this theme in exactly the same way the “failure to mention the word Jew” trope is used when needed as a distraction. This was done even though the pictures showed clearly that there was in fact no reason to bomb!
On February 23, 1979, the Washington Post reported that the pictures clearly show the camp’s gas chambers and crematoria where victims’ bodies were burned. Several photos show prisoners undergoing disinfection and standing in line to be tattooed. One photo shows a line of 1500 prisoners being led into the camp from 85 railroad boxcars parked at the end of the rail line just outside the camp.

Of course, the pictures showed no such thing. What they did show, however, was that the allegation that up to 20,000 Jews a day were waiting in line, stolidly and without incident, to go into the “gas chamber” was a myth. There were no lines of people waiting to go into the “gas chambers,” nor was there any evidence of the huge industrial apparatus that would have been necessary to kill and dispose of thousands of people at a time. As for the massive pits that Wiesel claims to have seen, there was no pit, no flame and no smoke to be seen. Thus, Wiesel’s own personal myth went up in nonexistent smoke, as it were.

The New York Times article was more cautious, for the author of its article was not even identified. This fact offered an excellent example of what Pius XII had referred to in his Christmas message of 1951 as the mendacious “anonymous voice” (“voix anonyme”) of the Western media.441 In this case, that voice tells us that the two authors of the book, Brugioni and Poirier, had worked on the project on their own time starting in April 1978.

The analysts said that the television series Holocaust, which included several scenes on a set meant to simulate Auschwitz, had motivated their project.Just as in the Washington Post review of the book, the narrative voice of the New York Times completely avoided the fact that the photos gave no evidence of what the “eye-witnesses” – for years – had been telling us had been there. He wrote:

They said that they could identify camp officers marching a newly arrived group of prisoners to the open gates of the gas chamber-crematorium compound. The analysts also pointed to a second group that they said was waiting to be disinfected and tattooed.

Despite the claim by these two CIA analysts, recycled by the Washington Post and New York Times, to the effect that these pictures reinforced the Jewish holocaust narrative, both the revisionists and the Holocaust fundamentalists now knew who was right and who was wrong about the allegation that Auschwitz had been an extermination camp. In just a few short years, the revisionists had mortally wounded and, with the release of these pictures, slain the Holocaust beast. They were jubilant for the simple reason that their position on the Holocaust had been vindicated.

On the other side, the Holocaust fundamentalists, unhappy that their historical scam had been revealed as such, decided to redouble their efforts to increase pressure on their owned and/or controlled politicians in order to enshrine the Holocaust as the new revealed dogma of the U.S.. By elevating the Holocaust to the level of an article of civic faith, and by imposing it on the U.S. population as the state religion, the Holocaust fundamentalists would be able to contain the revisionists and silence the doubters within the Jewish community while also using their new religion to justify the unlawful wars for Israel’s security that were to come.

1979: British Code Breakers: Another Nail in the Coffin of the Holocaust

By coincidence, at about the same time as the aerial photography of Auschwitz was declassified by the CIA, the distinguished British historian F. H. Hinsley of Cambridge University published his monumental study of British intelligence operations during the war years. It included documentation on the work that British code breakers had done in intercepting and deciphering encrypted German military communications. Hinsley wrote, with reference to the legendary gas chambers that so many “survivors” later said they had seen:

'From the spring of 1942 until February 1943 […] the returns (reports) from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassing.Hinsley’s conclusions dovetail perfectly with the information provided in the Allied aerial photography: there was no “gassing.”'

from the book Elie Wiesel, Saint of the Holocaust: A Critical Biography
Warren B. Routledge