To be is to be contingent: nothing of which it can be said that "it is" can be alone and independent. But being is a member of paticca-samuppada as arising which contains ignorance. Being is only invertible by ignorance.

Destruction of ignorance destroys the illusion of being. When ignorance is no more, than consciousness no longer can attribute being (pahoti) at all. But that is not all for when consciousness is predicated of one who has no ignorance than it is no more indicatable (as it was indicated in M Sutta 22)

Nanamoli Thera

Friday, September 27, 2024

Protestors Jailed, Paedophiles Walk Free


[In this video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, says:

“Anti-immigration protestors and those who posted their opinions on social media are currently being dragged from their homes and given the harshest possible sentences. Yet over the past two decades, over ten thousand paedophiles, rapists and sex offenders have walked free from court or escaped justice with a caution.”

– KATANA]

It has been a long-held belief in dissident circles that there is a conspiracy within the establishment to protect paedophiles. Well, actually it goes further; it is stated that there is a “conspiracy” to not only protect paedophiles, but to promote them, to allow them to operate in plain sight at the highest levels of state and media influence, and to ensure that the highest organs of the state provide shelter for these predators.

And this “conspiracy theory” is becoming harder and harder for the media and the government to dismiss. Mounting evidence which is now being collated on social media and even leaking out in the press all points to the fact that there is a genuine conspiracy afoot – a conspiracy to allow those who prey on the youngest and most vulnerable to walk free. But even worse, those in the very highest offices of the land, have been implicated in playing a central role in this conspiracy.

Over the last week this issue has become even more noticeable than ever before. The media has been enthusiastically reporting on the mass arrests of both those involved in anti-migrant protests, and those who have made statements on social media that go against the official state narrative on multiculturalism and mass immigration.

This draconian crackdown has led to the establishment of Soviet-style 24-hour courts where some of the harshest sentences I have ever seen are being handed down to people who merely shouted at police officers, or in some cases, were just present when others committed acts of disorder.

Those arrested have been immediately remanded in custody, and Judges have refused bail for nearly all of those accused. What’s more, even when suspects have entered guilty pleas and shown contrition, they have still been jailed immediately with sentences of 24 months or more.

A glaring example of this is the case of Steven Mailen from Hartlepool. Steven is a 54-year-old man who has no criminal record and previously served as a school governor. He is clearly a man of good character. He was sentenced to 26 months for “shouting” and “gesticulating” at police.

Now I want to make this clear, I don’t think anyone should be shouting at the police, but 26 months for someone who has never been in trouble with the law, for simply shouting and gesturing, is incredibly harsh!

And the case of Steven Mailen isn’t an outlier. Lee Joseph Dunn was jailed for eight weeks for sharing a picture of what the court described as “Asian men” with the caption, “coming to a town near you”. Memes like this have been shared far and wide by millions of people, but apparently, this is now a crime – and one that can only be dealt with by means of a custodial sentence.

Alongside these two cases, the media has enthusiastically reported that children as young as 12-years-of-age would face potential jail sentences for merely being present when disorder took place. Ask yourself this: When have you seen this response before?

How many young ethnic minority offenders have been given chance after chance when committing far more serious offences?

But whilst the press and the media were revelling in these harsh sentences, a Twitter user by the name Pagliacci the Hated was looking into the judges presiding over these hearings. And what she found was illuminating to say the least.

Many of the judges who have been enthusiastically handing down the maximum punishments possible, have previously allowed some of the most heinous sex offenders to walk free from court.

JUDGE ANDREW MENARY recently sentenced William Nelson Morgan, a 69-year-old pensioner, to 32 months in prison for refusing to move out of the way of police officers. However, Judge Menary previously let a paedophile, who collected baby rape videos, walk free from court with no jail time, because of what he cited as evidence of “good character”.

JUDGE NEIL RAFFERTY denied bail to those merely arrested for “viewing the riots remotely” – whatever that means. However, Judge Rafferty previously let a man convicted of raping his “vulnerable” niece walk free from court because the rapist was apparently “remorseful”.

JUDGE JEREMY RICHARDSON sentenced Kenzie Roughley, just 18-years-old, to 2 years in jail for kicking a CCTV van and goading police. Richardson had previously let a paedophile walk free from his court after he was found guilty of targeting a vulnerable 13-year-old girl for sexual abuse – the reason for this leniency was because Judge Richardson worried that the paedophile would “suffer comprehensibly in prison”.

This isn’t the whole thread; but I will put a link in the description below so you can see the thread in its entirety and follow the account.

But despite the great work done exposing these judges and their crooked rulings, I would wager that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and there are far more cases like this. In fact, if I made that wager, it would be the safest bet I could ever make – because it is now essentially government policy to let paedophiles walk free. And NO, this isn’t an over exaggeration.

I read this from the Daily Express, and I quote:

“Thousands of child molesters have been left roaming the streets after effectively being given a slap on the wrist for their heinous crimes. Analysis of Ministry of Justice figures shows that almost 4, 500 sex offenders have received either a community, or a suspended sentence since 2010.”

“New analysis, by Labour, shows 2,026 adults convicted were let off with community sentences and, 2,474 with suspended sentences.”

“This includes dozens who were convicted for sexual activity with a child under the age of 13.”

“Alarmingly, 291 suspended sentences were issued to sex offenders convicted of sexual assault on a child under the age of 16, or sexual activity with a child under the age of 16, in the first six months of last year.”

End quote. Sex offenders and paedophiles walking free from court in Britain is NOT an outlying oddity, it is the NORM!

And this has not only been going on for years, but there has also been an even more worrying trend of the government and the police covering up examples of serious sexual offences.

There is obviously and most notably the case of the grooming gangs. Gangs composed of largely Pakistani Muslim men who preyed mainly on young teenage White girls, many of whom were underage, and both the media, the government and the police covered up these crimes for decades, leading to over 100,000 British girls being groomed, sexually assaulted, raped, trafficked and even murdered.

I have covered this scandal numerous times before, however I will say this: In some cases, police officers were literally told to investigate other ethnic groups rather than pursue these sexual predators, in other cases, fathers of the victims were arrested when trying to free their daughters from the gangs that were abusing them.

But the cover-ups don’t stop at street level with migrant gangs – the state’s protection of paedophiles goes to the very top of our society. There are numerous examples of those in positions of influence in both the government and media, who have committed the most heinous of offences, yet the Crown Prosecution Service has refused to press charges against them.

A perfect example of this is former MP, member of the House of Lords and the founder of the Holocaust Educational Trust; Greville Janner. Janner was a prolific sex offender who sexually abused young boys in care homes over a period of five decades. 

The police and the Crown Prosecution Service repeatedly let Janner walk free and failed to prosecute him. In 2007 the CPS refused to press charges against Janner on the basis that he was suffering from “dementia”, when at the time he was still making official visits to both Parliament and the House of Lords.

And it would be impossible to discuss an issue such as this without mentioning the case of arguably Britain’s most famous and prolific sex offender; “SIR” Jimmy Savile. A man who sexually abused hundreds of people throughout his life, mostly children but some as old as 75, with most of his victims being female. Savile spent decades in the media spotlight, was a presenter of numerous BBC children’s television shows, was lauded for his charitable work and had unprecedented access to both politicians and the Monarchy.

The CPS repeatedly refused to press charges against Savile, despite mounting evidence presented by thirteen police forces which documented crimes against 450 victims. And who was the man in charge of the CPS when they refused to press charges? Well, it was none-other than our Prime Minister, “SIR” Keir Starmer, a man who earned a knight Hood from the Queen for his role as Director of Public Prosecutions.

Yes, Keir Starmer, the man now directing judges to hand down the harshest possible sentences to those who shouted at police officers, posted memes and in some cases, simply stood and watched disorder take place, is the same man who was in charge of the CPS when they refused to charge Britain’s most prolific sex offender.

Now I can’t prove that Starmer personally allowed “SIR” Jimmy Savile to escape justice, but equally, I find it hard to believe that the man in charge of the CPS would not have personally had knowledge of a case involving one of Britain’s most famous men, a case that involved thirteen separate police forces, and one where the victims numbered in the hundreds. OF COURSE HE KNEW! And I will go further, his involvement in covering up crimes like this is exactly why he received his knighthood, because he is central to the establishment’s conspiracy to protect sex offenders.

Justice in Britain no longer exists!

We live in a time when speaking out against mass immigration and multiculturalism is officially a greater crime than sexually abusing children – and this approach to so-called “justice” goes right the way up through the police force, the judiciary, the Crown Prosecution Service and reaches to the very highest tiers of government – right the way to the Prime Minister himself.

This is not a conspiracy theory! It’s a conspiracy to silence normal people, whilst at the same time ensuring protection for paedophiles.

***
Comments

All Govs are Zionist Occupied
1 month ago(edited)

Its impossible to fight an enemy who you don't even know is your enemy which is what is happening in all White nations by design. White homelands have been zionist (jewish supremacist) occupied nations for generations and 99% of the populations is clueless to this fact.

The brown invaders forced into White homelands are merely a tool for White genocide used by anti White jews. Frighteningly, a large portion of Whites dont even see the brown invaders as a threat due to the “diversity” propaganda propagated by the jews. Whites must become fiercely tribal and jew wise very soon in order to survive.

(...)

Source

Katana


No comments:

Post a Comment