Why Not Use the Apollo Technology?

 Gravity of Falling Objects

 The one way to determine whether the astronauts are really on the Moon is to measure the gravity by observing the time it takes for objects to fall. NASAX made sure that there were many such possibilities to determine the gravity by having the astronauts needlessly throwing all manner of objects at every opportunity. Here are a few examples of objects being thrown taken from Apollo 16 on the first EVA (App 12.36).

In all other missions, we also see the same unnecessary throwing of all manner of objects. I say unnecessary but for NASA-X it was an important aspect of the hoax in order to falsely “prove” that the astronauts were really on the Moon. The exception is Apollo 11 in which we do not see anything being thrown. Perhaps it was a later idea of NASA-X.

The pro-NASA fan club has been eager to use these instances as absolute proof that the astronauts were really on the Moon. I find this quite bizarre, do they really imagine that NASA-X would have been so dumb as to forget that we could calculate the gravity from the videos? Or do they fail to properly understand what a hoax is all about? Of course, NASA-X took this into account and used counter-balanced wires on the astronauts and slow-motion photography as we have already discussed. As we have seen they provided ample opportunity to calculate the gravity from the numerous instances of objects being purposefully thrown around on the Moon. They also introduced pendulums to provide more opportunity for us to make the gravity calculation.

Although NASA-X were quite clever in this gravity deception, it was far from perfect and they made several glaring errors. There were other instances that NASA-X seemingly forgot or failed to imagine. For example, the swinging flag that we discussed in Chapter 8 “Defying Gravity” (see App 8.08).

Gravity of Falling Sand

 Although, NASA-X were able to manipulate the videos to respect the lesser gravity on the Moon for objects thrown and the jumps of astronauts. They were unable to accomplish this simultaneously for the falling sand. In Chapter 8 “Defying Gravity” we also examined the “Big Navy Salute” made by astronaut John Young on the Apollo 16 mission (see App 8.10) in which the astronaut falls according to the gravity of the Moon but the sand falls according to Earth's gravity. It was not possible with the techniques used to fake both these events at the same time.

Here we have a close look at some of the astronaut jumps all taken from Apollo 16 but you can observe numerous such instances in all the other Apollo Missions (App 12.37). In all cases, the sand clearly falls faster than the astronaut which according to the laws of physics is impossible. In manipulating the “observable” gravity of the astronaut they were unable to simultaneously do the same for the falling sand. So what we observe is the astronaut behaving as though he is on the Moon and the sand behaving as though it is on Earth. This is incontestable evidence of the NASA-X fakery. When the evidence is so clear and indisputable how can the pro-NASA fan club members be so blind? It is this blindness to the evidence shown by the pro-NASA group that leads one to consider whether they are simply NASA shills and are simply acting disingenuously.

*

Poor Safety Procedures

 Thomas Baron was a safety inspector during the construction of Apollo 1. After the fire in the Apollo 1 capsule, he testified before Congress on 21 April 1967 that the Apollo programme was in such disarray that NASA would never make it to the Moon. Note, that this was just 15 months before the launch of Apollo 8 which allegedly took the first astronauts into orbit around the Moon.

Baron had submitted a detailed 500-page report to Congress detailing his findings (App 4.04). He believed that his opinions made him a target and he reported that he and his family had been harassed. One week after he had testified his car mysteriously stalled on a level railway crossing and was struck by a train. He, his wife, and step-daughter died in the accident. The accident was officially judged to be suicide. Some Sceptics, the foremost being Bill Kaysing (App 4.05), believe that Baron was murdered to silence him. It is interesting to note that Baron's report on the failings of the NASA Project Apollo disappeared and has never been found.

The Clavius website has a more critical assessment of Thomas Baron and indicates that he was somewhat overzealous in his work (App 4.06). Note, that we should not be so surprised that the Clavius website portrays Thomas Baron in such a bad light given that the Webmaster Jay Windley is one of the leading NASA Fanboys. However, it does make the point that if NASA were going to silence him then why wait until after he had presented his evidence to Congress. It would have been more logical to have him silenced before, but then again the damming details of his investigation may not have been fully known beforehand. Although his original report has been lost, or purposefully disposed of, you can get some idea of his claims in this excerpt posted on the Clavius website (App 4.07). You can also read Baron's testimony to Congress on the Clavius website (App 4.08).

The outcome of this tragedy was that Project Apollo was suspended pending a thorough investigation which resulted in a further delay of one year following a complete redesign of the Command Module. In March 1967 the NASA Director James Webb testified in front of the House Committee on Science and Astronautics expressing doubts about the chances of fulfilling Kennedy's goal. He was the very man who just six years previously had confidently told President Kennedy that a man on the Moon could be achieved within the decade. One year later on 7 October 1968, James Webb suddenly left NASA just three months before the Apollo 8 flight to the Moon. This followed the sudden resignation of the NASA Assistant Director Robert Seamans in January that same year. We also had Mercury astronaut Walter Schirra announcing his departure from NASA just 4 days after James Webb had announced his departure.

One has to wonder why, when the Apollo Moon landing was less than a year away, did these people decide to leave NASA in such a hurry. It is at this juncture in 1967, or perhaps 1966, that some sceptics contend that the decision was made to fake the Moon landings.

*

Why Not Use the Apollo Technology

 NASA has shown terrible custodianship of significant noteworthy ancient rarities concerning the Apollo Missions and the complete dismissal for overseeing mechanical worth. Almost certainly our doubters would contend that this a not an issue of good custodianship, but rather to a greater degree a conscious and deliberate, endeavor to annihilate proof that might be decided to be implicating when inspected with present day strategies for investigation. Truly, the misfortunes of antiques are practically epic in scale and one needs to address why NASA has been so determinately careless.

The Apollo Moon arrivals have been proclaimed as probably the best accomplishment of humankind and one would expect that all the documentation and mechanical accomplishments would be painstakingly saved for posterity.

 Regrettably, and shockingly, this doesn't appear to have been the situation. Apparently NASA has been not exactly upright in protecting these significant ancient rarities. This is astounding for two reasons, as a matter of first importance, the memorable idea of the accomplishment, in this cutting edge period we will generally hold as valuable all that actions the advancement and accomplishments of humankind. Also, the data was without a doubt of significant value for future space projects.

Now NASA intends to return into space with the Orion Project and gives off an impression of being battling to construct the innovation with which to do this. Doubters would firmly contend, and they do vociferously, that we apparently had the innovation to leave low Earth circle and make due in space fifty years prior. They question how NASA might have been so absolutely thoughtless, or were there other affecting explanations behind this apparent incompetence. The doubt is there for the cynics to add to their contentions that NASA faked the Moon arrivals and is presently attempting to obliterate whatever might at last demonstrate the fakery, especially when analyzed with current techniques for analysis.

The Hoax of NASA ...
Cushawa Eduardo
.com