“You’d have to be a recent immigrant from Outer Mongolia not to know of the role that people with Jewish names play in the coarsening of our culture. Almost every American knows this. It is just that most gentiles are too polite to mention it … The sad fact is that through Jewish actors, playwrights, and producers, the Berlin stage of Weimar Germany linked Jews and deviant sexuality in all its sordid manifestations just as surely as Broadway does today. Much of the filth in American entertainment today parallels that of Germany between the wars”. — Rabbi Daniel Lapin, Toward Tradition, January 2005. 47
One thinks of a “hero” in terms of Thomas Carlyle’s study on the role of the heroic individual in shaping history,48 what has been called “heroic vitalism”. In former generations the hero was typically a saint, soldier, empire builder, someone who lived or died for a higher purpose than the self. The definition is that of transcendent self-sacrifice.
The state of cultural decay is indicated by the types who are elevated into the status of today’s “role models”, especially for the young. They are Anti-Heroes. The definition is the antithesis of the Hero. The Anti-Hero one of lives for him or herself alone. Hedonism is the lifestyle, narcissism the temperament. The outlook benefits consumer capitalism, as it translates economically into a never-ending thirst for acquisition. This situation is concomitant with the general degradation of social morality, where self-indulgence is elevated into virtue, and immediate gratification is expected.
Paradoxically, this heralding of selfishness as the path to “happiness” as the purpose of life has resulted in a contagion of drug addiction, alcoholism, suicide, and mass medication and therapy for psychiatric disturbances. The self-quest for happiness has resulted in nothing but dissatisfaction and unfulfilled searches for meaning. The most discontented, the drug, pill and alcohol ridden, neurotic and narcissistic, are heralded as role models who symbolise and epitomise “success” in the Late West: the movie and music “stars”. It is no coincidence that they also happen to be overwhelmingly “liberals”, eagerly jumping on the bandwagon of every transient “feel-good” cause, while Hollywood has from its founding been one of centres for the spread of global spiritual-syphilis.
Hollywood has for generations defined “American culture”, which through globalisation has long become synonymous with “Western culture”. However, “Western culture” has been deconstructed and redefined by a foreign culture-organism. Hollywood is what Jewish commentators have referred to as “their empire”, where Jewish movie moguls were from the start of the motion picture industry able to define the “American Dream”.49 In the realm of music Sumner Redstone’s Viacom and MTV are at the apex.
The character of the USA was redefined by Emma Lazarus, whose poem, “The New Colossus” (1883) adorns the Statue of Liberty, to greet “The wretched refuse of your teeming shore”, and by Israel Zangwill with his play “The Melting Pot” (1908). Both were ardent Zionists who did not endorse multiculturalism among Jews. That is for Western consumption.50
Such influence is not a “conspiracy”; it is a natural occurrence when one wilful, vital culture exists within another, whether it is the British in India or the Spanish in Peru. Whether such an influence is positive or negative, symbiotic and complementary or destructive, depends on the culture organisms involved. Gumilev regarded the Jewish culture-organism as a perennially foreign element51 whose influence causes the “zig-zagging”, or distortion, of a culture’s life-path.
The Jews as a nomadic people, albeit unified across the world by a traditional axis mundi (Jerusalem) and religion, have been a catalyst for the breakdown of national consciousness among other peoples. Their nomadism makes them natural agents for internationalist ideologies, whether of the capitalist or socialist varieties. Other nomads, such as the steppes peoples of Russia and central Asia, have an ecological niche and have the potentiality to form nations and empires. Jews do not have an ecological niche, and remain wanderers, which is not to say that Jews per se are innately incapable of being absorbed into Western culture. Such absorption however has been fanatically resisted by the rabbinate and more recently by Zionism, as explained by the heretical Jewish scholar Dr. Israel Shahak.52
Degenerative Culture
“You’d have to be a recent immigrant from Outer Mongolia not to know of the role that people with Jewish names play in the coarsening of our culture. Almost every American knows this. It is just that most gentiles are too polite to mention it … The sad fact is that through Jewish actors, playwrights, and producers, the Berlin stage of Weimar Germany linked Jews and deviant sexuality in all its sordid manifestations just as surely as Broadway does today. Much of the filth in American entertainment today parallels that of Germany between the wars”. — Rabbi Daniel Lapin, Toward Tradition, January 2005. 47
One thinks of a “hero” in terms of Thomas Carlyle’s study on the role of the heroic individual in shaping history, 48what has been called “heroic vitalism”. In former generations the hero was typically a saint, soldier, empire builder, someone who lived or died for a higher purpose than the self. The definition is that of transcendent self-sacrifice.
The state of cultural decay is indicated by the types who are elevated into the status of today’s “role models”, especially for the young. They are Anti-Heroes. The definition is the antithesis of the Hero. The Anti-Hero one of lives for him or herself alone. Hedonism is the lifestyle, narcissism the temperament. The outlook benefits consumer capitalism, as it translates economically into a never-ending thirst for acquisition. This situation is concomitant with the general degradation of social morality, where self-indulgence is elevated into virtue, and immediate gratification is expected.
Paradoxically, this heralding of selfishness as the path to “happiness” as the purpose of life has resulted in a contagion of drug addiction, alcoholism, suicide, and mass medication and therapy for psychiatric disturbances. The self-quest for happiness has resulted in nothing but dissatisfaction and unfulfilled searches for meaning. The most discontented, the drug, pill and alcohol ridden, neurotic and narcissistic, are heralded as role models who symbolise and epitomise “success” in the Late West: the movie and music “stars”. It is no coincidence that they also happen to be overwhelmingly “liberals”, eagerly jumping on the bandwagon of every transient “feel-good” cause, while Hollywood has from its founding been one of centres for the spread of global spiritual-syphilis.
Hollywood has for generations defined “American culture”, which through globalisation has long become synonymous with “Western culture”. However, “Western culture” has been deconstructed and redefined by a foreign culture-organism. Hollywood is what Jewish commentators have referred to as “their empire”, where Jewish movie moguls were from the start of the motion picture industry able to define the “American Dream”. 49In the realm of music Sumner Redstone’s Viacom and MTV are at the apex.
The character of the USA was redefined by Emma Lazarus, whose poem, “The New Colossus” (1883) adorns the Statue of Liberty, to greet “The wretched refuse of your teeming shore”, and by Israel Zangwill with his play “The Melting Pot” (1908). Both were ardent Zionists who did not endorse multiculturalism among Jews. That is for Western consumption. 50
Such influence is not a “conspiracy”; it is a natural occurrence when one wilful, vital culture exists within another, whether it is the British in India or the Spanish in Peru. Whether such an influence is positive or negative, symbiotic and complementary or destructive, depends on the culture organisms involved. Gumilev regarded the Jewish culture-organism as a perennially foreign element 51whose influence causes the “zig-zagging”, or distortion, of a culture’s life-path.
The Jews as a nomadic people, albeit unified across the world by a traditional axis mundi (Jerusalem) and religion, have been a catalyst for the breakdown of national consciousness among other peoples. Their nomadism makes them natural agents for internationalist ideologies, whether of the capitalist or socialist varieties. Other nomads, such as the steppes peoples of Russia and central Asia, have an ecological niche and have the potentiality to form nations and empires. Jews do not have an ecological niche, and remain wanderers, which is not to say that Jews per se are innately incapable of being absorbed into Western culture. Such absorption however has been fanatically resisted by the rabbinate and more recently by Zionism, as explained by the heretical Jewish scholar Dr. Israel Shahak.52
When traditional dynastic states were broken down and capitalism arose, eroding the authority of the landed aristocracy and the Church, Jews became “harbingers of political and economic change”. 53 The “court Jew” became a feature of the rulership of Europe. There were “several hundred”, who shaped the emerging capitalist economies, according to Mendes-Flohr and Reinharz,54. The Reformation and the English Revolution accelerated the process. Of the latter, Rabbi Menasseh ben Israel, leader of Jewish community in The Netherlands, addressed an appeal for the re-admission of the Jews to England to Oliver Cromwell, whose Puritans had established their tyranny in the name of “liberty”. England would gain by Jewish migration because of “Profit”. “It is a thing confirmed, that merchandizing is, as it were, the proper profession of the Nation of the Jews”. Because God had taken the Jews from Israel, as a “chastisement”, and they were a people without a land, their protection was in their “Riches and possessions”, which they could put at the disposal of a nation’s ruler. 55From Italy, Germany, Holland, Poland, Turkey, Egypt, etc., the Jews had profited those places through their international commerce. Hence the Jews are “a Plant worthy to be planted in the whole world, and received into Populous cities…” 56The Jewish people thrive during the Late civilisation epochs where Money and City have displaced Faith and Land. While Jews, despite allegations throughout history to the contrary, are not the cause of this culture-crisis, it is the Late epoch during which they are positioned to take advantage, which is why we see Jews in prominence especially in the USA, reshaping politics, economics and culture as a people of four thousand years duration amidst a state of 240 years duration.
That the Jewish culture-organism is foreign to the Western culture-organism should be axiomatic and stated without accusations of “anti-Semitism”. Theodor Herzl founded Zionism precisely on the assumption that Jews are unable, and indeed must not, assimilate into Western society, or any other. Although the Old Testament shows that foreign culture-organisms assimilated into the Hebrew this was undertaken entirely on Israelites terms, as conquerors. No “zig-zagging” of the Israelite culture-mission and identity was tolerated.
As an unassimilated foreign body the Jewish intelligentsia deconstructs Western culture. When Carl Jung broke with his mentor Sigmund Freud, this was a conflict between antithetical world-views: the Western and the Jewish. Laurens van der Post wrote of the breach:
“Sex, however important was only part of the story. From there arose his [Jung’s] first great and ineradicable difference with Freud. To illustrate it at its most immediate and simple level, he could no more see a great Gothic spire, soaring above the finest of medieval cathedral achievement’s, as merely a phallic symbol, than mistake a horse for a mule”. 57Eminent Jewish historian Dr. Howard Sachar, wrote that the primary motivation of pioneer Freudians was,
“the unconscious desire of Jews to unmask the respectability of the European society which closed them out. There was no more effective way of doing this than by dredging up from the human psyche… sordid and infantile sexual aberrations… Even Jews who were not psychiatrists must have taken pleasure in the feat of social equalisation performed by Freud’s ‘new thinking.’ The B’nai B’rith Lodge of Vienna, for example, delighted in listening to Freud air his theories …” 58
When the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory in Weimar Germany synthesised Freud with Marx into the “sex-pol” (“sexual politics”) ideology and were sponsored as Jewish refugees from Hitlerism to re-locate to Columbia University, and to the Institute of Social Research, New York, their doctrine under various permutations promptly became a primary method for the deconstruction of Western culture, and particularly of Western man. 59
47 Daniel Lapin, “Jews have Debased American and Jewish Culture”.
48 Thomas Carlyle, 1840.
49 Neal Gabler, 1988.
50 K. R. Bolton, Babel Inc. , 135-147.
51Lev Gumiliev, Dreviania Rus’ I veliaia step’, 2004. See Mark Bassin, The Gumilev Mystique, passim.
52 Israel Shahak, 1994.
53 Paul R. Mendes-Flohr and Jehuda Reinharz (ed.) 1980, 7.
54 Ibid.
55 Menasseh ben Israel “To His Highnesse the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland (1655)”; in Mendes-Flohr and Jehuda Reinharz, 9.
56 Menasseh ben Israel, Ibid., 10.
57 Laurens van der Post, Jung and the Story of our Time.
58 H. Sachar, 1991, 400-401.
59K. R. Bolton, “‘Sex Pol’ Ideology: The Influence of the Freudian-Marxist Synthesis on Politics and Society”, 329-355.
From The Decline and Fall of Civilisations
by
Dr Kerry R Bolton
No comments:
Post a Comment